Yesterday I criticised Israel's handling of the protests at the Gaza border. I should not have been so quick to judge. We now learn that the 50 of those killed were Hamas terrorists. Israel had an absolute right to defend itself against such attacks.
"They control the Gaza Strip, and everything that happens there goes through them," the man explains.
"Hamas organizes these riots so that the people won't revolt. Hamas tell themselves, instead of having people revolt and turn against us, we'll send them to the fence and let them 'revolt' there freely," he continued.
The man further explained that while Gaza has electricity, Hamas streams orders to go to the fence and riot, and while some do not go, Hamas organizes transportation for those that do. He also explained Hamas instructs women and children to move closest to the fence under the pretense that the IDF does not shoot women and children.
"They [Hamas] have established a committee that is responsible for the march, and for telling people to go," he said, but, "people wear out and get fed up, and I am one of these people," he concluded.
The Hamas terrorist group on Wednesday refused to accept two shipments of medical supplies for Gaza hospitals, which are struggling with shortages, after seeing they were sent by Israel, Israel’s military liaison to the Palestinians said.
Yesterday he critisized Israel over the clshes in Gaza for not being restraint, when actually the IDF target 50 Hamas terrorists.Nick Boles is a Conservative MP, his wife is Jewish, and he put his Hebrew lessons on his MP expenses. He proposes that 50 of the 54 protesters killed were Hamas. (as if that were justification )
Or (more accurate ) he should condem Hamas for forcing men, women and children to participate in violence against Israel.Perhaps he could condemn Israel for shooting a Canadian doctor twice in the legs.
I can’t find what he actually said about the Israeli response in the first place, only references to the apology. Do you know what he actually said in the first place?Good for Nick Boles for admitting his mistake, not many people can do that (like some posters here).
Here -https://twitter.com/NickBoles/status/996379924461219841I can’t find what he actually said about the Israeli response in the first place, only references to the apology. Do you know what he actually said in the first place?
Isn’t it at least possible that his initial response was actually reasonable and he was forced in to a false retraction by political pressure?
Yesterday he critisized Israel over the clshes in Gaza for not being restraint, when actually the IDF target 50 Hamas terrorists.
Nick Boles is a Conservative MP, his wife is Jewish, and he put his Hebrew lessons on his MP expenses. He proposes that 50 of the 54 protesters killed were Hamas. (as if that were justification )
You should look up the word "terror".Hamas are terrorists, but so is the IDF- they have killed more unarmed civilians than Hamas has over the years.
Hamas are terrorists, but so is the IDF- they have killed more unarmed civilians than Hamas has over the years.
It is over 100 killed... funny how people forget to mention this. The killing started over a month ago. And yea Nick Boles probably got an ass kicking by May or others in the party to fall in line. It taints the conservative attacks on Labour for their supposed issues with anti-semitism.
Yesterday he critisized Israel over the clshes in Gaza for not being restraint, when actually the IDF target 50 Hamas terrorists.
Nick Boles is a Conservative MP, his wife is Jewish, and he put his Hebrew lessons on his MP expenses. He proposes that 50 of the 54 protesters killed were Hamas. (as if that were justification )
Didn't you read the op?So 50 others killed, and a thousand non-Hamas wounded is acceptable to you. How many IDF were harmed in this bloodly exchange? None. Not a scratch.
They fence people into a toxic cage for generations, then shoot them if they object.
How would you even know that? Hamas has a habit of killing their own people ...
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...-killed-by-hamas-forces-during-2014-conflict/
You should look up the word "terror".
An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying he would have killed her even if she was three years old.
Thanks. That’s pretty much what I’d expected. The point he made, echoing the article he linked, seems perfectly reasonable, presented in a calm and measured manner. The claim from Hamas that many (though not all) of the people killed were members doesn’t change that (it’s effectively presumed by the article in the first place).
It is over 100 killed... funny how people forget to mention this. The killing started over a month ago. And yea Nick Boles probably got an ass kicking by May or others in the party to fall in line. It taints the conservative attacks on Labour for their supposed issues with anti-semitism.
Hamas are terrorists, but so is the IDF- they have killed more unarmed civilians than Hamas has over the years.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...estinians-2014-than-any-other-year-since-1967
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/nov/24/israel
This is both terrorism and an atrocity, not to mention pure murder.
So 50 others killed, and a thousand non-Hamas wounded is acceptable to you. How many IDF were harmed in this bloodly exchange? None. Not a scratch.
They fence people into a toxic cage for generations, then shoot them if they object.
:lamo :lamohttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/nov/24/israel
This is both terrorism and an atrocity, not to mention pure murder.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...estinians-2014-than-any-other-year-since-1967
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/nov/24/israel
This is both terrorism and an atrocity, not to mention pure murder.
I can’t find what he actually said about the Israeli response in the first place, only references to the apology. Do you know what he actually said in the first place?
Isn’t it at least possible that his initial response was actually reasonable and he was forced in to a false retraction by political pressure?
Hamas are terrorists, but so is the IDF- they have killed more unarmed civilians than Hamas has over the years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?