- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 12,099
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Here is a case of a man who used an axe to kill four people, including an infant. Fortunately he was shot dead by the police and an 8 year old girl's life was saved who otherwise would've been another one of his victims. So that just goes to show that people don't need guns to kill, its not the tool but rather what its being used for, and that guns save lives such as in this case where the 8 year old girl's life was saved.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/oregon-g...ing-her-from-man-with-ax-who-killed-4-in-home
OK, those poor people go on to the axe homicide list and not on the 10,000+ strong gun homicide list.
If 10,000+ people were being killed by axes, you may have a point.
Do you think Stephen Paddock would have killed 58 people + himself if he'd had an axe collection ?
Always referring to the most extreme....
How many people could we save with axe registration. I call for common sense axe control. Start with registering any axe. Especially those with black handles. Those are assault axes.
Here was a mass murder using an axe.
He probably got it without registering.
Maybe even from a swap meet.
Gun control will always be half measures until the 2nd amendment is repealed and guns are banned.
Make it near impossible for people to buy guns and ammunition and seize existing guns and destroy them.
Then watch gun crime fall. Yes people wanting to kill will still want to, but less will attempt it and less still will achieve it.
Today is January 21st. Number of mass shootings so far this year: EIGHTEEN
https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting
What does any of that have to do with this heinous mass murder by axe?
Are you trying to minimize the damage done by an axe welding madman?
Nothing, this whole thread is pointless.
The OP wanted to say that removing guns won't change the number of people killed because they'd just use axes or something similar.
I call BS on that.
Homicides would dramatically reduce if guns were banned.
Relevance to this heinous attack?
Zero.
Please fail again.
Here is a case of a man who used an axe to kill four people, including an infant. Fortunately he was shot dead by the police and an 8 year old girl's life was saved who otherwise would've been another one of his victims. So that just goes to show that people don't need guns to kill, its not the tool but rather what its being used for, and that guns save lives such as in this case where the 8 year old girl's life was saved.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/oregon-g...ing-her-from-man-with-ax-who-killed-4-in-home
By all means direct your fail comments to the OP.
What exactly is incorrect in the OP?
Maybe you should read it and give everyone the benefit of your reasoning ?
Do you think Stephen Paddock would have killed 58 people + himself if he'd had an axe collection ?
That is your prerogative.I don't own a firearm
Good, you respect my choices I respect yours.feel free to own a hundred if it makes ya' feel better.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?