• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A good trend

Already a thread on this:

Along Came Jones

Thread 'The Democratic Party is hemorrhaging Democrats'

The Democratic party is hemorrhaging registered Democrats, that is. The really bad news for Democrats is the Republican party is gaining more registered Republicans. The source for this claim is an analysis published today by the New York Times. I found the analysis so startling that at the end of the following quote the link is gifted to make it accessible for those interested. I hope you read, reflect, comment and debate its merits.

The Democratic Party is hemorrhaging voters long before they even go to the polls.

Of the 30 states that track voter registration by political party...
  • Like
 
Lycanthrope said:
Already a thread on this:

Along Came Jones

Thread 'The Democratic Party is hemorrhaging Democrats'

The Democratic party is hemorrhaging registered Democrats, that is. The really bad news for Democrats is the Republican party is gaining more registered Republicans. The source for this claim is an analysis published today by the New York Times. I found the analysis so startling that at the end of the following quote the link is gifted to make it accessible for those interested. I hope you read, reflect, comment and debate its merits.

The Democratic Party is hemorrhaging voters long before they even go to the polls.

Of the 30 states that track voter registration by political party...
  • Like
Click to expand...
Using the search feature is apparently too hard for some folks. 🤷‍♀️
 
Hari Seldon said:
The cons see an article in the Times which they bash constantly and they are all over it. Too funny!!!
Click to expand...
The NY Times is particularly evil while most here give it high esteem. When it is available for free to wave in your faces pardon my taking a moment of shadenfreude ;)
 
Eriech said:
The NY Times is particularly evil while most here give it high esteem. When it is available for free to wave in your faces pardon my taking a moment of shadenfreude ;)
Click to expand...
Thats all you have. You worship a fascist scumbag with dementia.
 
Eriech said:
The NY Times is particularly evil while most here give it high esteem. When it is available for free to wave in your faces pardon my taking a moment of shadenfreude ;)
Click to expand...
🤷‍♀️

Republican voter registration is still way behind democratic and independent/unaffiliated.
 
Eriech said:
I am not a big fan of the NY Times but many of all you all are. Makes it especially sweet for me to read.

www.nytimes.com

The Democratic Party’s Voter Registration Crisis

The party is bleeding support beyond the ballot box, a new analysis shows.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
Click to expand...
What i love about the article is it clearly states: "There are still more Democrats registered nationwide than Republicans".
Leaves a bad taste in your mouth, huh....
 
Eriech said:
The NY Times is particularly evil while most here give it high esteem. When it is available for free to wave in your faces pardon my taking a moment of shadenfreude ;)
Click to expand...
So, the credible New York Times is "particularly evil" to you, @Eriech, except when it says something with which you agree.

No surprise.

Btw, it's schadenfreude.
 
Eriech said:
The NY Times is particularly evil while most here give it high esteem. When it is available for free to wave in your faces pardon my taking a moment of shadenfreude ;)
Click to expand...
LOL, The NY Times is the paper of record, and the fact that it prints facts that Trump doesn't like to hear doesn't make it "evil". But do fall in line with the master.
 
Eriech said:
I am not a big fan of the NY Times but many of all you all are. Makes it especially sweet for me to read.

www.nytimes.com

The Democratic Party’s Voter Registration Crisis

The party is bleeding support beyond the ballot box, a new analysis shows.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
Click to expand...
The funny thing is that I and many people I know are registered Republicans despite despising a large swath of their positions, and candidates (not all and not universally for the record)

Why you may ask? Closed primaries.
 
Pyrite said:
So, the credible New York Times is "particularly evil" to you, @Eriech, except when it says something with which you agree.

No surprise.

Btw, it's schadenfreude.
Click to expand...
No, I post the NYTimes because it is a source that you agree.
This source does not have the long history of evil but will get poo -pooed here.

hotair.com

'Death Cycle': Dem Bleedout Is Real -- And Spectacular

Explore the ongoing voter shift from Democrats to Republicans and its implications for future elections.
hotair.com hotair.com
 
Crakhobarbie said:
What i love about the article is it clearly states: "There are still more Democrats registered nationwide than Republicans".
Leaves a bad taste in your mouth, huh....
Click to expand...
There are still more Democrats registered nationwide than Republicans, partly because of big blue states like California allow people to register by party, while red states like Texas do not. But the trajectory is troublesome for Democrats, and there are growing tensions over what to do about it.

Reads a little differently inside the full statement, doesn't it? And then to really add to the confusion, only 30 states, a territory and D.C. report information about party registration.
 
JMR said:
LOL, The NY Times is the paper of record, and the fact that it prints facts that Trump doesn't like to hear doesn't make it "evil". But do fall in line with the master.
Click to expand...
With respect to this voter registration analysis the NY Times prints information some of Trump's opponents find to be not quite digestible.
 
Along Came Jones said:
With respect to this voter registration analysis the NY Times prints information some of Trump's opponents find to be not quite digestible.
Click to expand...
I find it a sad situation, but certainly "digestible" and since the source has excellent credentials also believable. It is just amusing that Trump's Fake News Chorus suddenly finds the NYTs trustworthy.
 
Along Came Jones said:
There are still more Democrats registered nationwide than Republicans, partly because of big blue states like California allow people to register by party, while red states like Texas do not. But the trajectory is troublesome for Democrats, and there are growing tensions over what to do about it.

Reads a little differently inside the full statement, doesn't it? And then to really add to the confusion, only 30 states, a territory and D.C. report information about party registration.
Click to expand...
Sure.
Nevertheless, there are still more registered democrats than Republicans.
And the more your demigod keeps killing Americans through his policies, the less folks are gunna be voting Republican.
Screenshot_20250716_153226_Facebook.webp
 
Crakhobarbie said:
Isn't donald your demigod?
Our countries "savior", in your mind?
Click to expand...
When you have something sensible and hopefully interesting to post to me I'll respond. This is neither sensible nor interesting.
 
Along Came Jones said:
When you have something sensible and hopefully interesting to post to me I'll respond. This is neither sensible nor interesting.
Click to expand...
I asked you a question.
If you'd prefer to run away with your tail between your legs, I can understand why.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom