• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A Good Guy With A Gun

I know. If only the criminal had been allowed to stab his victim to death in peace, then all would be right with the world.
Best scenario, he deescalates the situation but then again, he was reckless and unprofessional.
 
Best scenario, he deescalates the situation but then again, he was reckless and unprofessional.
He tried several times and when that didn't work he used necessary force and it was over.
 
Best scenario, he deescalates the situation but then again, he was reckless and unprofessional.
Sorry that you missed out on an innocent person being murdered.
 
Sorry that you missed out on an innocent person being murdered.
Had the hostage been killed, the same people would be complaining about the police not doing their job.
 
Have you ever been to Albuquerque? I was offered a job there once. Turned it down when I realized that "Breaking Bad" is pretty much a documentary about ABQ.

Oddly enough no

"...from 2010 through 2014, there were 4 fatal police shootings in England, which has a population of about 52 million. By contrast, Albuquerque, NM, with a population 1 percent the size of England''s, had 26 fatal police shootings in that same time period..."

So a town with 1% of the population of England, had 650% more fatal police shootings 2010-2014 ?????

Either English police are just way better or Albuquerque police are just homicidal maniacs.
 
Oddly enough no

"...from 2010 through 2014, there were 4 fatal police shootings in England, which has a population of about 52 million. By contrast, Albuquerque, NM, with a population 1 percent the size of England''s, had 26 fatal police shootings in that same time period..."

So a town with 1% of the population of England, had 650% more fatal police shootings 2010-2014 ?????

Either English police are just way better or Albuquerque police are just homicidal maniacs.
Or, Albuquerque is a Democrat run shithole like most of the large cities in the US.

Of course, you might not realize that since Norcross has a much higher crime rate than GA or the rest of the US.

 
Or, Albuquerque is a Democrat run shithole like most of the large cities in the US.

Of course, you might not realize that since Norcross has a much higher crime rate than GA or the rest of the US.


OK, can you point to a Republican run "shithole" where the cops don't kill hundreds of times more people than UK police do ?

How about Dallas, Texas ?
 
OK, can you point to a Republican run "shithole" where the cops don't kill hundreds of times more people than UK police do ?

How about Dallas, Texas ?

How about support your implied claim?
 
Back
Top Bottom