"Once it starts it's not going to stop."
Said by Charles Krauthammer, not exactly an enthusiastic Trump supporter. Of Trump Krauthammer has said, "He'll be terrible for the country." Trump has responded in kind, calling Krauthammer "terrible" and "a dummy". But Krauthammer thinks that elites have been hanging back on Trump. As people come out in support of him then more and more will be willing to back him. Krauthammer thinks that Trump releasing the names of potential SCOTUS nominees will galvanize the base for Trump.
Trump is ahead of Hillary in Fox News and Rasmussen polls.
Sanders appears to be dedicated to keeping the Democrats roiling in division all the way to to the DNC and beyond, and Hillary is getting weaker and weaker.
I bookmarked your OP so I can remind you of it this coming November. Better start working on your excuses now - a couple of which, I'm sure, will be "voter fraud" and "Hillary got it by giving free stuff away!"
"Once it starts it's not going to stop."
Said by Charles Krauthammer, not exactly an enthusiastic Trump supporter. Of Trump Krauthammer has said, "He'll be terrible for the country." Trump has responded in kind, calling Krauthammer "terrible" and "a dummy". But Krauthammer thinks that elites have been hanging back on Trump. As people come out in support of him then more and more will be willing to back him. Krauthammer thinks that Trump releasing the names of potential SCOTUS nominees will galvanize the base for Trump.
Trump is ahead of Hillary in Fox News and Rasmussen polls.
Sanders appears to be dedicated to keeping the Democrats roiling in division all the way to to the DNC and beyond, and Hillary is getting weaker and weaker.
I bookmarked your OP so I can remind you of it this coming November. Better start working on your excuses now - a couple of which, I'm sure, will be "voter fraud" and "Hillary got it by giving free stuff away!"
"Once it starts it's not going to stop."
Said by Charles Krauthammer, not exactly an enthusiastic Trump supporter. Of Trump Krauthammer has said, "He'll be terrible for the country." Trump has responded in kind, calling Krauthammer "terrible" and "a dummy". But Krauthammer thinks that elites have been hanging back on Trump. As people come out in support of him then more and more will be willing to back him. Krauthammer thinks that Trump releasing the names of potential SCOTUS nominees will galvanize the base for Trump.
Trump is ahead of Hillary in Fox News and Rasmussen polls.
Sanders appears to be dedicated to keeping the Democrats roiling in division all the way to to the DNC and beyond, and Hillary is getting weaker and weaker.
Whether she wins, or not, she will do both those things.
"Once it starts it's not going to stop."
Said by Charles Krauthammer, not exactly an enthusiastic Trump supporter. Of Trump Krauthammer has said, "He'll be terrible for the country." Trump has responded in kind, calling Krauthammer "terrible" and "a dummy". But Krauthammer thinks that elites have been hanging back on Trump. As people come out in support of him then more and more will be willing to back him. Krauthammer thinks that Trump releasing the names of potential SCOTUS nominees will galvanize the base for Trump.
Trump is ahead of Hillary in Fox News and Rasmussen polls.
Sanders appears to be dedicated to keeping the Democrats roiling in division all the way to to the DNC and beyond, and Hillary is getting weaker and weaker.
I hate to say it but I think Trump could win
There are plenty of people who wont vote for a democrat
Another group that wont vote for a women Democrat or republican
And Trump learned from the WWE on how to pander to people, to get them energized and engaged. I think he will turn the election into Wrestle Mania 2016. Turn out for Hillary could be low, while for Trump I expect it will be high from his supporters
I bookmarked your OP so I can remind you of it this coming November. Better start working on your excuses now - a couple of which, I'm sure, will be "voter fraud" and "Hillary got it by giving free stuff away!"
The difference is the GOP has already looked into the abyss. we have all psychologically prepared ourselves for a Hilllary win if Trump goes down in flames.
Your ilk, however, have so convinced yourselves that Trump can't win, that if he does you will blow a vein in your collective liberal foreheads.
I still think Hillary has the inside track to win. but pretending it will a cake walk isn't fooling anybody.
The difference is the GOP has already looked into the abyss. we have all psychologically prepared ourselves for a Hilllary win if Trump goes down in flames.
Your ilk, however, have so convinced yourselves that Trump can't win, that if he does you will blow a vein in your collective liberal foreheads.
I LMAO every time I think of some New York a-hole beating Comrade BS and the Queen of Corruption. I mean, hell's bells, Trump can't do any worse than BO has over the last 7 yrs. lol
Of course, of course! Never mind that that there's an almost total absence of actual voter fraud since the turn of the century, y'all will still blame it. And never mind that it was her husband who passed welfare reform in the 90's, y'all will still claim she's giving free stuff away.
Besides, when did y'all ever need something like, you know, ACTUAL EVIDENCE before y'all start making accusations? Heck, look at Benghazi - the lead military lawyer working for Trey Gowdy (the Republican heading up the Benghazi Committee) just came out and said that the military did everything it could have done to try to respond to Benghazi...but NOOooooo, you've still got to find something, ANYthing to blame her for!
Two progressive narratives in one post. Be still my heart.
He sees the almost total absence of actual voter fraud...and dismisses it by calling it a "narrative".
He sees the fact that the three-star general serving as the Republicans' chief lawyer on the Benghazi committee said that the military acted properly and did all it could to respond to Benghazi...and dismisses it by calling it a "narrative".
But I'm not surprised anymore - these days, actual things like "evidence" and "facts" mean nothing to the Right.
I LMAO every time I think of some New York a-hole beating Comrade BS and the Queen of Corruption. I mean, hell's bells, Trump can't do any worse than BO has over the last 7 yrs. lol
Sure he can.
While Obama had limited experience with government which showed in his interactions with Congress, Trump has ZERO experience. Congress won't like him passing down decrees from on high even more than they did with Obama.
As bad as Obama is....yes he can do worse. I didn't think we could do worse than Clinton, then we got Bush. Then I didn't think that we could do worse than Bush and we got Obama
There's always a "worse" option.
Trump? Worse than BO? LMAO. I seriously doubt that. The only way we can suffer a worse fate than BO would be to elect The Queen of Corruption, or Comrade BS, then I would agree, we could do worse.
Trump is a spoiled, loudmouth braggart with no understanding of government, diplomacy, or international politics.
It's easy for him to be much worse than Obama and to drag us all down with him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?