• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A black off-duty cop tried to help stop a crime. Another officer shot him.

Slingshot Bob has no idea that the first two officers had already stopped considering him a threat BECAUSE THEY RECOGNIZED HIM and asked him to walk towards them.
 

"I was afraid so I get to murder."
 
Definitely would cause concern if you are in civilian clothes and come up with a visible gun. But it does sound like the off duty officer did everything ordered to him.

This is going to be tough case.

the cops on scene did nothing wrong. it was the guy late to the party.
however the cops on scene should have called and let people know that there was a PC on site.
 
As the events played out. Officers responded to a stolen vehicle call.
Occupants of the stolen vehicle attempt to run and shot at law enforcement.
Cops finally stopped the occupants of the vehicle.
Armed 'citizen' appears trying to help, is ordered to the ground (with a firearm).
Cops recognize 'citizen' as a cop, tell him to get up and to assist.
Newly arriving officer, aware only that the cops were arresting suspects that had shot at them, sees an armed 'suspect' get up and approach with a gun'
Newly arriving officer fires, thinking it is a suspect, approaching cops with a gun.

Does that sound like the scenario as it played out?
 
All of the above?

My first thought was about hos the arriving/shooting officer should have assessed the situation and concluded that the other officers had it in hand.

Yep, arrives see a person with a gun, obviously the Officers on site are just plain stupid.
 
The stuff some people will bend over backwards to defend is nuts. We can now have cops be shot simply because they are seen as a threat by somebody who apparently didn't have all of the facts.


This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
 

No, as he was shot in the arm.
No mention he was on the ground when the Officer arrived.
I think you may have missed this???

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-top-stories_pn-offduty-1255pm:homepage/story

 
No, as he was shot in the arm.
No mention he was on the ground when the Officer arrived.
I think you may have missed this???

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-top-stories_pn-offduty-1255pm:homepage/story
I included all of that in the scenario I posted. Is it possible the officer that shot him LEGITIMATELY thought the suspect that was on the ground with a gun got up and started approaching the cops or did he just shoot because he was black, and hey...any chance to shoot a black guy.

I'm not excusing anything...I am just trying to see the scenario in an unbiased manner. I think its rather reasonable to see this is as piss poor communication by officers on the site and a really big (inexcusable) mistake.
 
You arent suggesting I am defending or excusing the shooting are you?
 

I read it differently, thus my reply.
 
You arent suggesting I am defending or excusing the shooting are you?

You're desperately trying to ignore what I actually said. Was this cop a threat?


This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
 
Fox News:

Black off-duty St. Louis officer shot by white officer | Fox News


Officer is cleared by two other officers, fourth officer arrives, no idea what is going on, shoots black officer. What did he use to determine that this guy was a threat that the other two people didn't have? Why did he determine him to be a threat when two other officers did not? We have a precise statistic on how many officers thought this guy was a threat, and proof that the fourth officer did not have all of the facts when making his decision, but there are people here still defending him.

Let the pretzel logic begin.

:lol:
 

That is because the shooter believed that all blacks are bad criminals and it is OK to shoot them.

That belief is absolutely shared by all the defenders of the shooter cop on DP.
 
That is because the shooter believed that all blacks are bad criminals and it is OK to shoot them.

That belief is absolutely shared by all the defenders of the shooter cop on DP.

People have been saying for a century that cops are often too rough when it comes to black suspects. Folks have been concern trolling about inner city violence like that excuses the failures of police departments around the US. Now we have an incident where even a law abiding black cop can be thought of as a suspect, and it will be justified by certain folks. The whole thing is absurdly self defeating. They've tried for so long to claim that black persons shot by cops deserved it because they were thugs, or because they had convictions for selling hand cigarettes and were too big.

Now, they are in a situation where it's PRETTY clear that the black person shot posed NO THREAT to the other officers or even the 4th who shot him and they don't know what to do but continue defending and hope nobody will smell the bull****.
 
You're desperately trying to ignore what I actually said. Was this cop a threat?


This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
Im not desperately trying to do anything. Certainly not avoiding anything. I are you suggesting I am defending or excusing the shooting?
 
Im not desperately trying to do anything. Certainly not avoiding anything. I are you suggesting I am defending or excusing the shooting?

Find a post where I've addressed such a post?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…