So your case essentially is I think this one document says X because I found some web site that claims is says X but I really couldn't be bothered to verify it for myself. Is there another document you haven't bothered to actually read or comprehend whose contents you are just going to assume support your claim that you would like us to consider?
I see. Thank you.
So your case essentially is I think this one document says X because I found some web site that claims is says X but I really couldn't be bothered to verify it for myself. Is there another document you haven't bothered to actually read or comprehend whose contents you are just going to assume support your claim that you would like us to consider?
So your case essentially is I think this one document says X because I found some web site that claims is says X but I really couldn't be bothered to verify it for myself. Is there another document you haven't bothered to actually read or comprehend whose contents you are just going to assume support your claim that you would like us to consider?
So your case essentially is I think this one document says X because I found some web site that claims is says X but I really couldn't be bothered to verify it for myself. Is there another document you haven't bothered to actually read or comprehend whose contents you are just going to assume support your claim that you would like us to consider?
Shall I continue.
Shall I continue.
Only if you can be concise, state the case in your own words using video or audio sources as backup AND can do it in a manner that isn't a Gish-Gallopy spam fest.
Crap like the above is not likely to get a favorable response from me.
The 911 "truth" movement peaked in 2006.
Since then it is on a decline.
A decade a still no intelligent counter theory.
A decade and still no real.smoking gun.
no I have not. I'm not a lawyer & this is not a courtroom either though.
DRAKE: That's right. I was never actually interviewed for the 9/11 Commission.
JAY: Why?
DRAKE: Because I think my testimony was so explosive. It was smoking gun evidence of NSA's culpability.
JAY: Yeah. Just to remind people, we talked about this in an earlier segment, that the NSA actually had eavesdropping hard evidence of the connection between these guys, two guys that end up on the American Airlines flight in San Diego and what was known as a Yemeni switchboard for al-Qaeda, and I'm sure much more than that.
DRAKE: Oh, actually, far more. That was just one part of it. There was actually an entire intelligence report that they had done prior--months and months. It was actually in early 2001 that NSA refused to allow it to go out for distribution to the rest of the community. And the analysts were beside themselves. I didn't find out about it until shortly after 9/11, when it was brought to me.
JAY: What was in it?
DRAKE: The entire network that we knew at that time, based on signals intelligence.
JAY: The entire network that winds up doing 9/11.
DRAKE: The entire al-Qaeda and associated movement. Yes. Not every single hijacker, but most of them were known. Yes.
JAY: Well, I've got to return to something we talked about earlier. There's a back channel to Cheney. You can't sit on this stuff.
DRAKE: Of course not.
“I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed, without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today – my own government.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.
I don't really think we know how long the prep was. I know that it sounds screwy, but there's just some element of truth hiding in there that gives me pause.
As for your versions of 911, you really have to back and look at the beginning of the first X Files movie...
Why is not being a lawyer relevant?
It is written in layman's term.
If you need help, ask.
Ha you want to help me. Something tells me your not being sincere.
Relevance?
Just because you found a phrase is irrelevant.
Relevance to who did 911?
Well, you have gotten the.intent and content of the PNAC wrong.
Add to that you refuse to read the.document.
Someone has to save.you from your intentional ignorance.
You do realize the OPINION PIECE you wrote really didn't say what YOU wanted it to say... Right?
Well, you have gotten the.intent and content of the PNAC wrong.
Add to that you refuse to read the.document.
Someone has to save.you from your intentional ignorance.
You do realize the OPINION PIECE you wrote really didn't say what YOU wanted it to say... Right?
Drake was left out of the 9/11 Commission, because he knew to much & would not lie.
NSA knew about most of the hijackers before 9/11. Back channel intelligence to Cheney sat on it. They let it happen on purpose.
Big Picture. Were not the nice guys you think we are.
It said enough, plus I posted other sources.
Also I said I would read it. You watch the interview & read A Peoples History of the United States. Then I will read it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?