9/11: The Israeli involvement

[Eko Ren]

Really, then how am I posting in it? Or you for that matter?

That wasn't personal. I was using the statement as a figure if speech meant to refer to my exaggerated agreement with what the guy I quoted said.

Oh I agree. It's also about when these absurd conspiracy theories insult our intelligence. They aren't just an insult, they're an all out assault.

Tranquilo. It'll be okay. You don't have to believe that what occurred on September 11th of 2001 was dubious. There is just overwhelming evidence that it was.

So, how exactly does vitamin c or alcohol in conditioner actually kill your hair and create a dependency?

Well, what it does is it strips your hair of it's cuticle. You know, that outer layer much like the dermis. Okay, and speaking of skin, it's like getting a facial, using conditioner with such components. A facial takes off your very first layer of skin (considered mostly dead anyway), so that your skin feels fresh and new and baby-like. But when you use conditioner all the time, though, it begins to strip off layer after layer until your hair feels like ****. The dependency comes from the other components often found in conditioners like oils and petroleum and such, which will make your hair feel "moisturized"

So...you read that vitamin C is a common ingredient in vitamin c, your girlfriend buys conditioner and it has vitamin C in it, and this proves what exactly? Hell, I'll settle for what it simply suggests.

Huh?

 

[Bodi]

And the thread has been shut down.

There is a difference between conspiracy theory and refusing to allow our intelligence to be insulted. Let me tell you a story.

I read up on Vitamin C (citric acid) for one reason or another and found out that they put it in conditioner, interchangibly and alongside alcohol and the like, to destroy your hair and create a dependency. I told my girlfriend this in a store the other day. She proceeded to buy a conditioner that advertised fruit extracts and one of the top ingredients was vitamin C.

Go fig.

Vitamin C and Hair Loss

Vitamin C improves the absorption of iron, glucosamin and many other nutrients critical to healthy hair growth. Vitamin C aids in improving scalp circulation. It is important to maintain capillaries that carry blood to the follicles

Vitamin C and Hair Loss



Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is essential for the formation, growth, and repair of bone, skin, and connective tissue (which binds other tissues and organs together and includes tendons, ligaments, and blood vessels). Vitamin C helps maintain healthy teeth and gums. It helps the body absorb iron, which is needed to make red blood cells. Vitamin C also helps burns and wounds heal. Like vitamin E, vitamin C is an antioxidant: It protects cells against damage by free radicals, which are by-products of normal cell activity that participate in chemical reactions. Some of these reactions can be harmful.

Vitamin C Deficiency

Not eating enough fresh fruits and vegetables can cause the deficiency.
People feel tired, weak, and irritable.
Severe deficiency, called scurvy, causes bruising, gum and dental problems, dry hair and skin, and anemia.
The diagnosis is based on symptoms and sometimes blood tests.
Increasing consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables or taking supplements by mouth usually corrects the deficiency.

The hair becomes dry and brittle, and the skin becomes dry, rough, and scaly.

Vitamin C: Vitamins: Merck Manual Home Edition


Tell us another story please...

 

[Eko Ren]

Vitamin C and Hair Loss

Vitamin C improves the absorption of iron, glucosamin and many other nutrients critical to healthy hair growth. Vitamin C aids in improving scalp circulation. It is important to maintain capillaries that carry blood to the follicles

Vitamin C and Hair Loss

This is an advertisement for a dietary supplement.

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is essential for the formation, growth, and repair of bone, skin, and connective tissue (which binds other tissues and organs together and includes tendons, ligaments, and blood vessels). Vitamin C helps maintain healthy teeth and gums. It helps the body absorb iron, which is needed to make red blood cells. Vitamin C also helps burns and wounds heal. Like vitamin E, vitamin C is an antioxidant: It protects cells against damage by free radicals, which are by-products of normal cell activity that participate in chemical reactions. Some of these reactions can be harmful.

Vitamin C Deficiency

Not eating enough fresh fruits and vegetables can cause the deficiency.
People feel tired, weak, and irritable.
Severe deficiency, called scurvy, causes bruising, gum and dental problems, dry hair and skin, and anemia.
The diagnosis is based on symptoms and sometimes blood tests.
Increasing consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables or taking supplements by mouth usually corrects the deficiency.

The hair becomes dry and brittle, and the skin becomes dry, rough, and scaly.

Vitamin C: Vitamins: Merck Manual Home Edition

Clearly, this is a medical article that discusses the necessity of ingesting Vitamin C.

Tell us another story please...

Once upon a time, little Jimmy grew pubes and a couple of feet, developed bass, got laid, and realized that one is not to eat hair conditioner.

 

[Eko Ren]

I noticed none of the non-questioners made any kind of comment on this graphic.

Can an ‘authority as truther’ please explain what that graphic means to them? Try to take science into account.

Thanks.

Peace

Is this a more provocative question than one about hair conditioner and Vitamin C?

Hahahahahhaha. "Trolls."

 

[dirtpoorchris]

Once upon a time, little Jimmy grew pubes and a couple of feet, developed bass, got laid, and realized that one is not to eat hair conditioner.

How do you know me and who gave you permission to publish my autobiography?

 

[Khayembii Communique]

It doesn't take a scientist to understand this concept:

I noticed none of the non-questioners made any kind of comment on this graphic.

I already refuted this.

 

[Eko Ren]

I already refuted this.

That was a very interesting mathematical illustration.

I have but one question regarding that.

How did they determine the point at which t = 0?

 

[Khayembii Communique]

How did they determine the point at which t = 0?

The videos are in the post. Contained in the videos are the counts. t=0 began at the beginning of collapse.

 

[Eko Ren]

The videos are in the post. Contained in the videos are the counts. t=0 began at the beginning of collapse.

Oh, man, thanks for making me watch that.

Here, let me give it to you:

Indeed, when the penthouse's interior collapsed, it fell accelerating at a rate of g, but the rest of the structure hadn't collapsed. That doesn't necessarily mean that the clock continues from when it's internal structure fell. Gravity is only acting on the interior, so the clock only runs for the interior. Indeed, it fell for about 6 seconds, which is what I'd imagine something of that capacity to fall at when weighed with the WTC building itself. Then the penthouse itself fell, taking about 7 seconds. Then the entire WTC building fell, taking 7-9 seconds. They all fell at freefall rate, respectively. Why is it relevant to take that into account?

The fact that each structure fell at a free-fall rate of acceleration respectively even further solidifies the controlled demolition case, in that they all fell at a rate that coincides with the assumption that their structures were individually targeted and dismantled. As opposed to, say, hit by a plane, where one would figure that the energy transferred as a result of the small object hitting the large object somewhere above halfway up the structure would tip it over, especially when said projectile is made of aluminum and the stationary object had a steel infrastructure.

I mean, really.

 

[BmanMcfly]

Obviously not, since it did happen.

That it did happen, and the explanation for how it happened defies physics means that the the explanaition is inadequatewrong.

I noticed none of the non-questioners made any kind of comment on this graphic.

Can an ‘authority as truther’ please explain what that graphic means to them? Try to take science into account.

Thanks.

Peace

It's to say that air resistance < concrete/steel resistance to a falling object.

Unless you really think that the 'mass' of the structure offered only an average of 0.05 seconds of resistance per floor against the collapsing structure. It'd be about the resistance of dropping an 8 ball through 110 sheets of paper towel... hell, the paper towel might even slow the 8 ball down MORE than the steel and concrete structure slowed down the collapse of the WTC buildings.

 

[dirtpoorchris]

That it did happen, and the explanation for how it happened defies physics means that the the explanaition is inadequatewrong.



It's to say that air resistance < concrete/steel resistance to a falling object.

Unless you really think that the 'mass' of the structure offered only an average of 0.05 seconds of resistance per floor against the collapsing structure. It'd be about the resistance of dropping an 8 ball through 110 sheets of paper towel... hell, the paper towel might even slow the 8 ball down MORE than the steel and concrete structure slowed down the collapse of the WTC buildings.

I think it would stop after 110 sheets of resistance. If the fall wasn't that great and the sheets where close enough to each other one to let the 8-ball gain momentum.

Unless we are talking about an 8-ball of crack.

 

[BmanMcfly]

I think it would stop after 110 sheets of resistance. If the fall wasn't that great and the sheets where close enough to each other one to let the 8-ball gain momentum.

Unless we are talking about an 8-ball of crack.

I was meaning at about the distance between the concrete floors... um 10-12 ft.