Trump spent more than $70,000 to style his hair when he was on 'The Apprentice' and wrote it off as a business expense: NYT
The Times found that Trump avoided paying federal income taxes for 10 of the past 15 years and paid just $750 in taxes in both 2016 and 2017.
Nancy's hair looks much better though...$70K for Trump's hair is less than what it cost taxpayers for Pelosi's hair salon stunt.
20% of those polled say it will, that is not good news for trump.Another dud.
No secret Russia deals. No Michael Cohen stuff. Nothing illegal.
And he was under audit.
Won't change any minds.
Yes, Trump is definitely "another dud". In fact, a whole lot of duds.Another dud.
No secret Russia deals. No Michael Cohen stuff. Nothing illegal.
And he was under audit.
Won't change any minds.
Another dud.
No secret Russia deals. No Michael Cohen stuff. Nothing illegal.
And he was under audit.
Won't change any minds.
Trump is going to have a major problem with all of his bank loan documents.Another dud.
No secret Russia deals. No Michael Cohen stuff. Nothing illegal.
And he was under audit.
Won't change any minds.
Hes been under audit for 10 years.... Plus there is no law saying you cant share your tax return while under audit Trump just made that up.Another dud.
No secret Russia deals. No Michael Cohen stuff. Nothing illegal.
And he was under audit.
Won't change any minds.
$70K for Trump's hair is less than what it cost taxpayers for Pelosi's hair salon stunt.
Trump is going to have a major problem with all of his bank loan documents.
Won't change any minds.
Latest Trump bid to shield taxes meets skeptical judges
Lawyers for Donald Trump were met with skepticism from federal appeals court judges as they made their latest attempt to block New York prosecutors from getting their hands on his tax filings and other financial documents through a grand jury subpoena.
“Are you asking us to change the way grand juries have done their work from time immemorial just because we’re dealing with somebody who’s president of the United States?” U.S. Circuit Judge Robert Katzmann asked Trump lawyer William Consovoy at a hearing on Friday. The case is being heard by a three-judge panel of the court.
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. is seeking eight years of the president’s taxes and other financial records as part of a grand jury investigation looking into matters including payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.
Great example of how the "reight wing 'judges rule according to law and not desired results.One might come to believe that Trump is becoming a bit worried about his tax obligations and the multiple business loans soon coming due.
found this article on a website where the next headline is -- Accountants favor Trump in election by large margin
For those curious about how the Trump v. Vance case has not been shot down by the SCOTUS, I offer the following from ScotusBlog.com
"On July 9, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Trump v. Vance. By a vote of 7-2, the justices rejected the president’s claim that he is always immune from state grand jury proceedings while he is in office."
The decision by the Supreme Court does look to have some sweeping indicators for other potential cases involving DJT.
did she claim her hair as a deductible expense, when in fact, you cannot deduct hair expenses?$70K for Trump's hair is less than what it cost taxpayers for Pelosi's hair salon stunt.
If you are going by what the law says, show us where it requires anyone to share their tax returns with the public.Hes been under audit for 10 years.... Plus there is no law saying you cant share your tax return while under audit Trump just made that up.
Great example of how the "reight wing 'judges rule according to law and not desired results.
is it? He was claiming it for a haircut. He can claim their salary, but not his actual haircut or hair coloring or hair implants...why? Because you wear those in non business environments....like at home. He wouldn't list their salary under hair care either.If the show had hair stylists and makeup artistis, etc, which presumably they would have, that would seem to be normal course for the entertainment industry, the cost is obviously a legitimate business expense.
start being investigated for tax evasion and see how quickly the court and investigators get access to your tax returns.If you are going by what the law says, show us where it requires anyone to share their tax returns with the public.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Have documentation for your comment? Of course not but it sounds great.$70K for Trump's hair is less than what it cost taxpayers for Pelosi's hair salon stunt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?