- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,938
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
"In a brief interview at her home in Silver Spring, Keyser said that she did not recall the party, but that she was close friends with Ford and that she believes Ford’s allegation."
(Source)
She's lying. She should be charged and if convicted, sent to prison. You people are all about upholding the law, start upholding it.
"In a brief interview at her home in Silver Spring, Keyser said that she did not recall the party, but that she was close friends with Ford and that she believes Ford’s allegation."
(Source)
So, we have Ford who says Keyser was at the party and we have Keyser saying she was NOT at the party and yet we have Keyser saying that she believes Ford. Got it. I'd hate to have to go to the jury with that.
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford | Fox News
" Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News."
When this is all over, I really hope Kavanaugh files defamation suites against anyone and everyone responsible for attacking his character.
I totally understand the left's wanting revenge for the Merrick Garland thing. I really do, even though these are two completely different situations. The right obviously played partisan politics to stop Garland from making it to the Court. But, the right never once tarnished the character of Garland or falsely accused him of any crimes in order to stop his nomination. What the left is doing to Kavanaugh is totally disgusting. In fact, this whole MeToo movement has begun a new era in which you can destroy political or other opponents or further your agenda by mere accusations alone with no proof.
Why would they even need to tarnish Garland? Refusing him a hearing was sufficient. Also, your post contains the inherent assumption that Republicans could find something dirty on Garland if they really wanted to.
OK...so which part of "The three people she claimed were present, one of them being a female, ALL have denied any knowledge of such a gathering or the attack?" is it that YOU are failing to grasp?
Well I'll admit, this is not supporting Ford's story.
It will be interesting if Ford's testimony jogs and memories, or brings others out into the open?
The unfolding drama over the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford just got even more bizarre as Ed Whelan, president of the conservative Ethics and Public Center (EPPC) released the picture of a remarkably similar looking teenager who could have been the culprit in the alleged attempted rape. While Ford insists that she could not be mistaken, the release of the photo adds a new element to the hearing . . . and could raise some interesting legal issues after suggesting Chris Garrett (right) could be responsible for the attack. The problem is that there is not a single scintilla of evidence that has been offered to link Garrett to the alleged assault. He has simply been drop into these boiling cauldron and the only explanation is his similar looks and home in the area (which is hardly surprising for schoolmates who attended the same school).
Update: Whelan has now issued a statement that “I made an appalling and inexcusable mistake of judgment in posting the tweet thread in a way that identified Kavanaugh’s Georgetown Prep classmate. I take full responsibility for that mistake, and I deeply apologize for it. I realize that does not undo the mistake
The point is: To push this through without a proper (FBI) investigation, is dereliction of duty.Wonder if someone new comes out during their testimony & supports her claim. Or even another claim
Would scuttle the nomination?
If so, would the FBI investigate?
If the FBI corroborated these events would he be impeached or resign or remain on the bench?
We have already seen from since she was outed that those on the Committee, excepting Flake attack her and confirm the nomination will go thru
Then we have Whelan outing another as the alleged perpertatror. He a friend of Judge K and other Conservatives
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1042908203804188672
https://jonathanturley.org/2018/09/...w-chris-garrett-into-the-fray/comment-page-2/
The point is: To push this through without a proper (FBI) investigation, is dereliction of duty.
I expect nothing less from Trump and the GOP. I find them repulsive.
Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday the testimony of Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser won’t change his mind, no matter what she says.
“You can’t bring it in a criminal court, you would never sue civilly, you couldn’t even get a warrant,” Graham said on “Fox News Sunday” with Chris Wallace. “What am I supposed to do? Go ahead and ruin this guy’s life based on an accusation? I don’t know when it happened, I don’t know where it happened, and everybody named in regard to being there said it didn’t happen.”
Do you remember every person at a party, 36 years ago when to your knowledge nothing you know of happened?
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News."
When this is all over, I really hope Kavanaugh files defamation suites against anyone and everyone responsible for attacking his character.
Especially the ones I wasn’t at?
I can tell you that if someone from pretty much every party I went to said “hey...remember that party over at Tillman’s moms house where Joanie took off her top and dance on the table to The Wall”? I would remember it. And if I was one of just 4-5 people at a party where one of those attending just up and vanished...yeah...I think I would recall that as well.
So no one else can answer it...maybe you can. WHY do you believe her? None of the participants she has claimed were in attendance have any recollection of the party, let alone the incident. Whatever may or may not have happened happened 4 decades ago. The woman in question has a history of liberal activism and an axe to grind against Trump.
So why do you believe her? A REASONABLE position would be to believe it possible. But to BELIEVE it happened with nothing more than he said she said? You have to be invested in THAT it happened.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have been saying this for quite some time
Now we see Graham on the loose regarding playing party politics.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/23/kavanaugh-ford-lindsey-graham-837391
Do you remember every person at a party, 36 years ago when to your knowledge nothing you know of happened?
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford | Fox News
" Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News."
When this is all over, I really hope Kavanaugh files defamation suites against anyone and everyone responsible for attacking his character.
But do you give HIM the benefit of doubt?I give her the benefit of the doubt pending an FBI investigation.
This absolutely proves that Ms. Ford is lying since I have total recall of every party that I attended in High School, or even back in the 1970s if you want to stick with a 40 year time limit.
I'm sure that you can recall every party that you attended 40 years ago as well.
Right?
But do you give HIM the benefit of doubt?
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford
4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford | Fox News
" Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News."
When this is all over, I really hope Kavanaugh files defamation suites against anyone and everyone responsible for attacking his character.
You are kidding...right? Should the FBI investigate an allegation of a possible sexual assault between a 17 and a 15 YEAR OLD FROM 4 DECADES AGO THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE HAPPENED AT A HOUSE WHERE THE VICTIM DOESNT REMEMBER WHERE IT WAS, WITH WITNESSES SHE SAYS WERE THERE THAT ALL DENY BEING THERE INCLUDING THE FEMALE WITNESS, AT A TIME WHEN SHE CANT REMEMBER WHEN IT ACTUALLY WAS....Should the FBI investigate?
This absolutely proves that Ms. Ford is lying since I have total recall of every party that I attended in High School, or even back in the 1970s if you want to stick with a 40 year time limit.
I'm sure that you can recall every party that you attended 40 years ago as well.
Right?
The point is: To push this through without a proper (FBI) investigation, is dereliction of duty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?