• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford

"In a brief interview at her home in Silver Spring, Keyser said that she did not recall the party, but that she was close friends with Ford and that she believes Ford’s allegation."
(Source)

She's lying. She should be charged and if convicted, sent to prison. You people are all about upholding the law, start upholding it.
 

Red:
"We" do not have Keyser declaring she was NOT at the party. What Keyser said, through her attorney, declaring she doesn't recall being at the party. Those are two very different statements.
 

Love your sig-line.
Obviously, it's true.

Thanks for the information. As it stands now, I would say Ford is full of :bs
 

Why would they even need to tarnish Garland? Refusing him a hearing was sufficient. Also, your post contains the inherent assumption that Republicans could find something dirty on Garland if they really wanted to.
 
Why would they even need to tarnish Garland? Refusing him a hearing was sufficient. Also, your post contains the inherent assumption that Republicans could find something dirty on Garland if they really wanted to.

They could do like the Democrats and just make something up.
 
Well I'll admit, this is not supporting Ford's story.

It will be interesting if Ford's testimony jogs and memories, or brings others out into the open?
 
OK...so which part of "The three people she claimed were present, one of them being a female, ALL have denied any knowledge of such a gathering or the attack?" is it that YOU are failing to grasp?

Do you remember every person at a party, 36 years ago when to your knowledge nothing you know of happened?
 
Well I'll admit, this is not supporting Ford's story.

It will be interesting if Ford's testimony jogs and memories, or brings others out into the open?

Wonder if someone new comes out during their testimony & supports her claim. Or even another claim
Would scuttle the nomination?
If so, would the FBI investigate?
If the FBI corroborated these events would he be impeached or resign or remain on the bench?

We have already seen from since she was outed that those on the Committee, excepting Flake attack her and confirm the nomination will go thru
Then we have Whelan outing another as the alleged perpertatror. He a friend of Judge K and other Conservatives

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1042908203804188672

https://jonathanturley.org/2018/09/...w-chris-garrett-into-the-fray/comment-page-2/

 
The point is: To push this through without a proper (FBI) investigation, is dereliction of duty.

I expect nothing less from Trump and the GOP. I find them repulsive.
 
The point is: To push this through without a proper (FBI) investigation, is dereliction of duty.

I expect nothing less from Trump and the GOP. I find them repulsive.

I have been saying this for quite some time
Now we see Graham on the loose regarding playing party politics.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/23/kavanaugh-ford-lindsey-graham-837391
 
Do you remember every person at a party, 36 years ago when to your knowledge nothing you know of happened?

Especially the ones I wasn’t at?

I can tell you that if someone from pretty much every party I went to said “hey...remember that party over at Tillman’s moms house where Joanie took off her top and dance on the table to The Wall”? I would remember it. And if I was one of just 4-5 people at a party where one of those attending just up and vanished...yeah...I think I would recall that as well.

So no one else can answer it...maybe you can. WHY do you believe her? None of the participants she has claimed were in attendance have any recollection of the party, let alone the incident. Whatever may or may not have happened happened 4 decades ago. The woman in question has a history of liberal activism and an axe to grind against Trump.

So why do you believe her? A REASONABLE position would be to believe it possible. But to BELIEVE it happened with nothing more than he said she said? You have to be invested in THAT it happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Not only is Kavanaugh being defamed, but the people who she's named like Mark Judge, etc are being defamed by being declared as witnesses to an act which they say didn't happen in front of them.

If it was me, I'd feel like I'd been declared an accessory to a crime - I'd be suing for damages from the DNC, Washington Post, CNN, and whoever else helped to feed this hysteria. And yes, I'd be suing the accuser herself.

The media are circulating a Scarlet Letter.
 

I give her the benefit of the doubt pending an FBI investigation.
 
I have been saying this for quite some time
Now we see Graham on the loose regarding playing party politics.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/23/kavanaugh-ford-lindsey-graham-837391

May be it's time to retire Graham from politics. He's starting to get as daffy as the man at the top. For God's sake. Kavanaugh's life isn't going to be "ruined" should he be denied a seat on the Supreme Court. I'm pretty sure that if that happens that he would not then feel compelled to move far away and seek therapy.
 
Do you remember every person at a party, 36 years ago when to your knowledge nothing you know of happened?

And actually the fact that this was 36 years ago makes it quite easy for anyone who doesn't want to get caught up in this controversy to claim that they don't recall or don't remember and thus avoid making any kind of definitive statement one way or the other for which they might later be on the hook for.
 

This absolutely proves that Ms. Ford is lying since I have total recall of every party that I attended in High School, or even back in the 1970s if you want to stick with a 40 year time limit.

I'm sure that you can recall every party that you attended 40 years ago as well.

Right?
 

And it's usually always the wild ones that you don't remember.
 

Annnnnnd the story keeps on a-crumblin'.
 
Should the FBI investigate?
You are kidding...right? Should the FBI investigate an allegation of a possible sexual assault between a 17 and a 15 YEAR OLD FROM 4 DECADES AGO THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE HAPPENED AT A HOUSE WHERE THE VICTIM DOESNT REMEMBER WHERE IT WAS, WITH WITNESSES SHE SAYS WERE THERE THAT ALL DENY BEING THERE INCLUDING THE FEMALE WITNESS, AT A TIME WHEN SHE CANT REMEMBER WHEN IT ACTUALLY WAS....

and you want the FBI to investigate.

Dear sweet baby hay Zeus.






zus.
 

Nope I certainly don’t. But I wouldn’t go try to destroy someone for something I could not really substantiate or prove.
 
Given there were only five people at the party, and two of those weren't in the room when it happened, that's an overfilled witness box.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…