• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

400,000 flee violence in Kyrgyzstan; US base threatened

Phantom

John Schnatter 2012
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
638
Reaction score
184
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive

 
It's bad enough to cite Russia Today when we're talking about American or European issues, but it's downright ridiculous to listen to anything it has to say when it's talking about a situation where its patron is so deeply involved. It's like reading Xinhua to find out what's going on with Tibet.
 

So do you just listen to American News ? maybe you need to broaden your horizons !
 
So do you just listen to American News ? maybe you need to broaden your horizons !

I listen to reliable news wherever it comes from. I don't listen to state-run propaganda enterprises.
 
Ethnic Fissures Imperil Stability of Kyrgyzstan - NYTimes.com
 
I listen to reliable news wherever it comes from. I don't listen to state-run propaganda enterprises.

Gave up on CNN, ABC, NBC, etc. did you? :mrgreen:
 

So what in the article do you take exception to?

In other words what is not true?
 

Is RT state controlled? Also how is Russia directly involved in whats going on in Kyrgyzstan?
 
Sigh! I am really sad about what is happening in Kyrgyzstan. I was there a couple of years ago. It is the only country in Central Asia where it is easy to get a tourist visa. The nature is so pure and unspoiled there, because it is the wild west of travelling, which has prevented tourists from going there and spoiling it. As well that, the governments have been so unstable there, that investors dont want to touch it, which has prevented most of the spoiling, because I doubt any Kyrgyzstani government would have made rules to protect the environment and Kygyzstani people from being exploited by foreign industry. The current violence is likely to not only prevent the nature being spoiled, but to also deprive a lot of families of the summer income they get from the few tourist like me, who come alone, during the short period every year when the weather there allows it.
 
So what in the article do you take exception to?

In other words what is not true?

If I claimed that Obama hated America and cited an Alex Jones youtube as proof, no one would expect you to sit through 10 minutes of it and make a bullet point list of the things you found objectionable. The fact that the source is overwhelmingly biased renders its entire content untrustworthy.

Similarly, I'm not sitting through a 10 minute video from Russia Today so that I can provide you with a list of points that I think it embellished or over/underemphasized in order to reflect the Russian government's viewpoint. There are thousands of reliable sources out there with information on the situation in Kyrgyzstan, so there's no reason not to use those as a platform for discussion.

Is RT state controlled?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/a...p/News/World/Countries and Territories/Russia


Russian News, English Accent - Up To The Minute - CBS News



SE102 said:
Also how is Russia directly involved in whats going on in Kyrgyzstan?

The Russian government considers Kyrgyzstan to be within its sphere of influence. Russia gets very testy when other countries interfere in the affairs of its "near abroad," particularly where the country affected has strong ethnic ties to Russia or was a former Soviet republic. It threw a ****fit when the west got involved in Kosovo, but turned around and did the exact same thing in Georgia. It has apparently decided that its interests in Krygyzstan will be best served by allowing the situation there to play out for the moment, which means that nobody else is going to get involved either. I don't know that I necessarily blame them, but they, more than anyone else, have the ability to put an end to this.
 
Let's hope this does not have a major impact on the Transit Center at Manas since this is the best way to move troops into Afghanistan. Also, it is important for supplies into the area, and also for projecting power in Eastern Europe.
 
Ty RNYC I did not know that it was a state channel. Interesting.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…