RussiaToday said:The UN says that up to 400 thousand people have fled from the ethnic violence in Kyrgyzstan. It also warns that many are facing shortages of food, water and medical supplies. Meanwhile, Kyrgyzstan's interim government says it could close the U.S. Manas air base in the country if the UK doesn't extradite Maksim Bakiev, the son of the ousted President.
It's bad enough to cite Russia Today when we're talking about American or European issues, but it's downright ridiculous to listen to anything it has to say when it's talking about a situation where its patron is so deeply involved. It's like reading Xinhua to find out what's going on with Tibet.
So do you just listen to American News ? maybe you need to broaden your horizons !
...The provisional Kyrgyz government has lost control of large areas in the southern part of the country because of its failure to quell attacks that have killed at least several hundred ethnic Uzbeks, and possibly many more. ... Moreover, as many as 400,000 have fled their homes. Barricading themselves in their cities and neighborhoods, Uzbeks have essentially set up autonomous zones and are refusing to recognize the authorities in the capital. ... the government has charged that the deposed president, Kurmanbek S. Bakiyev, incited the violence as a way to return to office.
I listen to reliable news wherever it comes from. I don't listen to state-run propaganda enterprises.
It's bad enough to cite Russia Today when we're talking about American or European issues, but it's downright ridiculous to listen to anything it has to say when it's talking about a situation where its patron is so deeply involved. It's like reading Xinhua to find out what's going on with Tibet.
So what in the article do you take exception to?
In other words what is not true?
It's bad enough to cite Russia Today when we're talking about American or European issues, but it's downright ridiculous to listen to anything it has to say when it's talking about a situation where its patron is so deeply involved. It's like reading Xinhua to find out what's going on with Tibet.
So what in the article do you take exception to?
In other words what is not true?
Is RT state controlled?
But on Russia Today, an English-language news channel begun in 2005 and financed by the Russian government, a more generous picture emerges. In this Russia, corruption is not quite a scourge but a symptom of a developing economy. And concerns about street thugs, poverty and Ukraine’s aspirations for European Union membership trump fears over Vladimir V. Putin’s grip on power.
This Moscow-based channel’s view of Russia is available to 120 million television viewers worldwide. That includes 20 million in the United States since last summer, when Russia Today was added to Time Warner Cable’s digital package in the New York City region.
The Russian government has already poured more than $100 million into Russia Today, prompting charges that Kremlin sponsorship affects its coverage. Andrei N. Illarionov, a former adviser to Mr. Putin and now one of his critics, last year called the channel Russia’s “best propaganda machine for the outside world.” The station is part of the state-owned news conglomerate RIA Novosti, and news organizations routinely refer to it as “state-run,” including The New York Times, which has said it was created to promote “pro-Kremlin views.”
Interesting stories like the Russian art scene reported by John Kluver, one of the few Americans working for "Russia Today." A former CNN cameraman-turned-correspondent, he's still trying to learn the ropes.
And he has no illusions about his employer.
"When I talk to friends and they say, 'Hey John, what are you doing there? What's with the new project?' I usually describe it in English or in Russian as a propaganda tool for the Russian government," he says.
SE102 said:Also how is Russia directly involved in whats going on in Kyrgyzstan?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?