- Joined
- Jan 20, 2020
- Messages
- 20,325
- Reaction score
- 4,175
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
American Airlines plans to follow suit, according to Nate Gatten, American's chief government affairs officer.
American will also allow most passengers barred from flying for mask noncompliance "to resume travel at some point in time," Gatten said in an earnings call on Thursday.
IMO it depends what they did. If they just wouldn't wear a mask, then they should probably be allowed back at some point in the not too distant future, now that masks aren't required. If they were disruptive, abusive, or physically violent with staff, then I have much less sympathy.3 US airlines will let some passengers banned for mask violations back on their flights
Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines said they would now allow some passengers who were banned from their planes because of mask violations to return to their flight rosters -- determined on a case-by-case basis.www.cnn.com
Interesting. First they call for a ban on all unruly people, but when given the chance welcome them back? Confusing.
Screw em. Don’t let them back. Maybe if more had said NO things would have been different.IMO it depends what they did. If they just wouldn't wear a mask, then they should probably be allowed back at some point in the not too distant future, now that masks aren't required. If they were disruptive, abusive, or physically violent with staff, then I have much less sympathy.
IMO it depends what they did. If they just wouldn't wear a mask, then they should probably be allowed back at some point in the not too distant future, now that masks aren't required. If they were disruptive, abusive, or physically violent with staff, then I have much less sympathy.
Maybe not. Depends on how you wear that Speedo.Screw em. Don’t let them back. Maybe if more had said NO things would have been different.
I’m glad I never played the mask game. It doesn’t matter if one doesn’t want to wear one but did anyway. Ok, I’ll do what the man says so I can still fly down to the Keys.
I stood my ground and sacrificed recreation and seeing our new grandson. My dignity is more valuable than 7 days on the beach.
They always had the power to ban people who didn’t wear masks. What they wanted was for the government to ban their competitors from doing business with the people they banned.3 US airlines will let some passengers banned for mask violations back on their flights
Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines said they would now allow some passengers who were banned from their planes because of mask violations to return to their flight rosters -- determined on a case-by-case basis.www.cnn.com
Interesting. First they call for a ban on all unruly people, but when given the chance welcome them back? Confusing.
Hot take. That makes a certain amount of sense, considering how quickly they ditched masks and brought banned passengers back.They always had the power to ban people who didn’t wear masks. What they wanted was for the government to ban their competitors from doing business with the people they banned.
I don’t get it. Is that some kind of gay joke?Maybe not. Depends on how you wear that Speedo.
Your dignity is more valuable than seeing your grandson?Screw em. Don’t let them back. Maybe if more had said NO things would have been different.
I’m glad I never played the mask game. It doesn’t matter if one doesn’t want to wear one but did anyway. Ok, I’ll do what the man says so I can still fly down to the Keys.
I stood my ground and sacrificed recreation and seeing our new grandson. My dignity is more valuable than 7 days on the beach.
I don’t know any gay jokes. Typically no one has dignity in a Speedo.I don’t get it. Is that some kind of gay joke?
I’ll look it up lol.I don’t know any gay jokes. Typically no one has dignity in a Speedo.
3 US airlines will let some passengers banned for mask violations back on their flights
Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines said they would now allow some passengers who were banned from their planes because of mask violations to return to their flight rosters -- determined on a case-by-case basis.www.cnn.com
Interesting. First they call for a ban on all unruly people, but when given the chance welcome them back? Confusing.
Exactly. It's a case-by-case thing that will be the determination.IMO it depends what they did. If they just wouldn't wear a mask, then they should probably be allowed back at some point in the not too distant future, now that masks aren't required. If they were disruptive, abusive, or physically violent with staff, then I have much less sympathy.
I work in the industry. Dunno how unruly they were in each case but most bans are temporary. The more aggressive their behavior the longer the ban (up to permanent) but also depends on the airline.3 US airlines will let some passengers banned for mask violations back on their flights
Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines said they would now allow some passengers who were banned from their planes because of mask violations to return to their flight rosters -- determined on a case-by-case basis.www.cnn.com
Interesting. First they call for a ban on all unruly people, but when given the chance welcome them back? Confusing.
I never once saw this proposed. Link?They always had the power to ban people who didn’t wear masks. What they wanted was for the government to ban their competitors from doing business with the people they banned.
If only you had replied to this thread and therefore uncontrovertibly had seen this proposed.I never once saw this proposed. Link?
‘That makes it illegal for all airlines to do business with them, including the airline that put them there. That’s not the same as banning competitors from serving them.
I'm sorry you got caught in a lie. Just a tip, but it's better to plead forgetfulness than try to rationalize. Anyone would believe that you simply forgot that thread after seven months.‘That makes it illegal for all airlines to do business with them, including the airline that put them there. That’s not the same as banning competitors from serving them.
Your wording was ambiguous, no need to be so mad about itI'm sorry you got caught in a lie. Just a tip, but it's better to plead forgetfulness than try to rationalize. Anyone would believe that you simply forgot that thread after seven months.
Anything for money, for sure. I'm sure airlines are afraid to ban most people because they fear that person will just fly on another carrier. Literally putting profits ahead of the lives of passengers and crew.I work in the industry. Dunno how unruly they were in each case but most bans are temporary. The more aggressive their behavior the longer the ban (up to permanent) but also depends on the airline.
Anything for money, for sure. I'm sure airlines are afraid to ban most people because they fear that person will just fly on another carrier. Literally putting profits ahead of the lives of passengers and crew.
Don't believe in 2nd chances??3 US airlines will let some passengers banned for mask violations back on their flights
Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines said they would now allow some passengers who were banned from their planes because of mask violations to return to their flight rosters -- determined on a case-by-case basis.www.cnn.com
Interesting. First they call for a ban on all unruly people, but when given the chance welcome them back? Confusing.
Airlines don't care. As long as massive corporate profits can be made and they can continue to destroy the planet without interference, they are happy.I would have not allowed it.
These scumbags deserved their banning. They clearly don’t give a shit about others. Typical MAGAts, selfish. Me, me, me
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?