• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2411 Bodies of Aborted Children Found at Abortion Doctor's Residence. Hideous and Ghoulish


The same lord that has aborted many more fetuses than abortionists by the means of a miscarriage?
 

Anybody who calls God a murderer when people die has just eliminated themselves from consideration as a serious debater.
 


I was going to answer but Peter already did and it is great., Thanks Pete.
 
Anybody who calls God a murderer when people die has just eliminated themselves from consideration as a serious debater.

God is not a murderer but God is an asshole if he exists... allowing women to be raped, the slaughter of innocent people around the world, etc. Even abortion, by your logic. The idea of free will is a stupid concept that people came up with the help with the con job that is God and religion. Free will allows the concept of God to not be challenged because it is us doing all the wrong... well, he allowed it to come to fruition and the idea that we fell out of Eden because is another stupid concept that I can not believe that any thinking adult actually believes. Children? Yes. Adults? What the **** is wrong with those people?
 
You're all alone out there. Your fellow atheists are embarrassed for you. Decent people are horrified that 2411 little children's bodies are stored at this ghoul's home. I hope you will rethink your comments. Goodnight.

Sadly not so , a couple of individuals think his comment was worthy of a like of laughter. I'm an atheist and I find his commentary appalling so don't judge us all by the inhuman nonsense on display by some atheists
 

Who are you to say what is good or bad when you do not know the whole picture? Five years ago, I went to a daily mass, then within an hour, I missed a step, fell down steps and tore my quadriceps tendon off my kneecap. I said "This is the reward I get for going to mass". But it turns out, i had had knee and back pain for 25 years. Once I had the surgery, spent six weeks in a cast, and went through rehab, my knee and resulting back pain were completely gone. I started eating healthy and have lifted weights and done cardio ever since. The accident turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to me. But I wasn't seeing the big picture right after the accident. I didn't know there was a big picture. Just like you don't knwo when you say God is mean for letting all these apparently bad things to happen.
 
Sadly not so , a couple of individuals think his comment was worthy of a like of laughter. I'm an atheist and I find his commentary appalling so don't judge us all by the inhuman nonsense on display by some atheists

Haters gonna hate.
 
Your comments don't reflect well on you imo

I can make any food jokes I want because I have superior food ethics.

Lighten up, Francis.
 
The law will change in my lifetime. Praise God for that.

Not a chance... :lol: It is in the Constitution.


Or you could have just decided to eat healthy 25 years earlier...

Just like you don't knwo when you say God is mean for letting all these apparently bad things to happen.

Sure... because a 12 year old girl being kidnapped by ISIS and raped could ever be a good thing...
 
Not a chance... :lol: It is in the Constitution.



Or you could have just decided to eat healthy 25 years earlier...



Sure... because a 12 year old girl being kidnapped by ISIS and raped could ever be a good thing...

No, it's not. lol. You foreign people should stick to your own backward country, and stop trying to tell us about our great country.
 
No, it's not. lol. You foreign people should stick to your own backward country, and stop trying to tell us about our great country.

You're holding up moronic nationalism as a shield for your idiotic crap. He's American. Better switch from dumbass nationalism to victim mode quick.
 
The law will change in my lifetime. Praise God for that.

That is highly unlikely since overturning Roe v Wade would most likely dismantle all the Precedents that came before Roe including the right of a parent to choose a private or religious school instead of a state school to send their child to.

These precedents most likely would become dismantled if Roe v Wade were overturned.

Weems v. United States (1910)
In a case from the Philippines, the Supreme Court finds that the definition of "cruel and unusual punishment" is not limited to what the authors of the Constitution understood under that concept.

Meyer v. Nebraska (1923)
A case ruling that parents may decide for themselves if and when their children may learn a foreign language, based upon a fundamental liberty interest individuals have in the family unit.

Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)

A case deciding that parents may not be forced to send their children to public rather than private schools, based on the idea that, once again, parents have a fundamental liberty in deciding what happens to their children.

Olmstead v. United States (1928)

The court decides that wire tapping is legal, no matter what the reason or motivation, because it is not expressly prohibited in the Constitution. Justice Brandeis' dissent, however, lays the groundwork for future understandings of privacy.

Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)
An Oklahoma law providing for the sterilization of people found to be "habitual criminals" is struck down, based on idea that all people have a fundamental right to make their own choices about marriage and procreation.

Tileston v. Ullman (1943) & Poe v. Ullman (1961)

The Court refuses to hear a case on Connecticut laws prohibiting the sale of contraceptives because no one can demonstrate they have been harmed. Harlan's dissent in Poe, however, explains why the case should be reviewed and why fundamental privacy interests are at stake.

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Connecticut's laws against distribution of contraceptives and contraceptive information to married couples are struck down, with the Court relying on earlier precedent involving the rights of people to make decisions about their families and procreation as a legitimate sphere of privacy.

Loving v. Virginia (1967)
Virginia law against interracial marriages is struck down, with the Court once again declaring that marriage is a "fundamental civil right" and that decisions in this arena are not those with which the State can interefere unless they have good cause.

Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972)

The right of people to have and know about contraceptives is expanded to unmarried couples, because the right of people to make such decisions exists due not simply to the nature of the marriage relationship. Instead, it is also due to the fact that it is individuals making these decisions, and as such the government has no business making it for them, regardless of their marital status.

Roe v. Wade (1973)
The landmark decision which established that women have a basic right to have an abortion, this was based in many ways upon the earlier decisions above. Through the above cases, the Supreme Court developed the idea that the Constitution protects a person's to privacy, particularly when it comes to matters involving children and procreation.
 
Last edited:
I am honestly bewildered at how this man could sleep nights with all this carnage at his own home all around him. Some people, very few, have no conscience. Hillary Clinton is another of those.

How many aborted fetuses did she have in her house?
 
No, it's not. lol. You foreign people should stick to your own backward country, and stop trying to tell us about our great country.

How many female uterus do you plan on invading to stop abortion? Any last minute catch-o-sperm to keep sperm from dying?
 
No, it's not. lol. You foreign people should stick to your own backward country, and stop trying to tell us about our great country.

New Zealand rules... and I am an American.
 

Well then if it is it's own body, it can be detached at any time to be it's own person.

Until then, it is using the woman's own life force - possibly against her will.
 
The legitimate question is what is wrong with you? Because many of us support a woman’s right to choose what happens with her own body does not mean we approve of what Klopfer did.
 

As blunt as your points are they hold truth and accuracy and the flaws of religion in informing rational explanations or decisions on this issue.
 

This is the very crux of the problem. For those of whom are not religious the lines don't match up.

On one hand everyone informs me of how God is a divine spirit of kindness and love etc... and when it comes to abortion link the divine and religious beliefs to their view on abortion. Yet you then expect no comments to be made that questions God and his involvement or guidance in acts and debates such as these.

You cannot use religion to inform your decision, with a certain theology underpinning your belief and not get criticism when debating the matter.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…