• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

23 Nobel Prize-winning economists slam Trump agenda, endorse Harris

Thanks for showing me what you are. I choose not to engage.
 
And if Trump's tariffs ARE inflationary, guess who he'll blame.
 
I find this post quite ironic. The poster is calling out "left wingers" for "rarely ever comment on the subject at hand" for not commenting on a post he made about the Hunter Biden laptop....

Good sir, the subject at hand is NOT the Hunter Biden laptop, its:

"23 Nobel Prize-winning economists slam Trump agenda, endorse Harris" ​


What on earth does Hunter Biden's laptop have to do with Kamala Harris's economic plan? Let me help you: absolutely nothing. Stick to the subject, please.



I live in Colorado and I have the same questions and concerns...

verrip1 said:
Wow!! Twenty-three economists? That must be at least 99.96% of all economists.
Click to expand...
Its the subject here is not 23 economists, its "23 Nobel Prize-winning economists, that have slamed Trump agenda, endorse Harris.

Now I don't know how many living economists have won the Nobel Prize, a very, very elite accomplishment, but my guess is the 23 economist comprise almost ALL of the US economists that have achieved such stature.

verrip1 said:
Yeah, Krugman was one. That says it all. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!
Click to expand...
...and what does it say? ...... do you have the professional credentials to take Krugman's arguments apart? Let's start with the fact that 22 other Nobel prize winning economists agree with him, so your credentials better be really, really impressive. Where did you do your PhD again?




Seems to be a lot of ADD among posters in this thread. Please slow down, read, think (maybe research), then post....

​

​

 
Last edited:
Ha! Nice rebuttal. You tore them a new one.
Look who also supports Kamala:

https://apple.news/AGzxKH6mbTCaPsN0elSKU2whttps://apple.news/AGzxKH6mbTCaPsN0elSKU2w

apple.news

82 Nobel-Prize recipients in science fields endorse Harris

More than 80 Nobel Prize winners from a variety of scientific fields endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president, lauding her commitment to technology and research.

Why it matters: Scientific advancements and climate change responses would be undermined by former President Trump, the scientists warned during the final days of the razor-thin campaign.
The signatories are Nobel Prize recipients in chemistry, economics, medicine and physics from the 1970s to this year.

What they're saying: "The enormous increases in living standards and life expectancies over the past two centuries are largely the result of advances in science and technology," the letter said.

"Kamala Harris recognizes this and understands that maintaining America's leadership in these fields requires budgetary support from the federal government, independent universities, and international collaboration."
 
Thanks..... the state of current American politics has been well summed up by Neil deGrasse Tyson. It well reflects the settlements of those that still think.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…