• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2008 liberal media awards

is your name a play on the advertising agency?

1984........
At the age of three Comrade Ogilvy had refused all toys except a drum, a sub-machine gun, and a model helicopter. At six - a year early, by a special relaxation of the rules - he had joined the Spies, at nine he had been a troop leader. At eleven he had denounced his uncle to the Thought Police after overhearing a conversation which appeared to him to have criminal tendencies. At seventeen he had been a district organizer of the Junior Anti-Sex League. At nine teen he had designed a hand-grenade which had been adopted by the Ministry of Peace and which, at its first trial, had killed thirty-one Eurasian prisoners in one burst. At twenty-three he had perished in action. Pursued by enemy jet planes while flying over the Indian Ocean with important despatches, he had weighted his body with his machine gun and leapt out of the helicopter into deep water, despatches and all - an end, said Big Brother, which it was impossible to contemplate without feelings of envy. Big Brother added a few remarks on the purity and single-mindedness of Comrade Ogilvy's life. He was a total abstainer and a nonsmoker, had no recreations except a daily hour in the gymnasium, and had taken a vow of celibacy, believing marriage and the care of a family to be incompatible with a twenty-four-hour-a-day devotion to duty. He had no subjects of conversation except the principles of Ingsoc, and no aim in life except the defeat of the Eurasian enemy and the hunting-down of spies, saboteurs, thoughtcriminals, and traitors generally.
 
This is the same media that repeatedly and catagorically denied a BJ was sex when Monica did Bubba in the White House. Those are interviews I will never forget as my wife and I watched this ship of fools desperately try to defend ol' Billy-Bob Clinton. It was as funny as any Laurel & Hardy. I once had a literature professor at Norhtern Il. U. tell the class if anyone was anti-communist their chance of passing his class was at best remote. I believe he watched alot of Tee-Vee!
 
My biggest disappointment with Clinton was his choice of pork. He represents America and the best he could do is Monica Lewinsky? We ought to have impeached him for that.

I would have felt better had he been caught with a good looking man.
 
Nah...there is no liberal bias in the MSM!

...
There's always been bias, but now its all out nuts. This is reflected in their ratings and subscriptions, which are likely an all time low. The brands that try to be fair and balanced, though, are doing very well. That tells me that the American people aren't all stupid.
 
There's always been bias, but now its all out nuts. This is reflected in their ratings and subscriptions, which are likely an all time low. The brands that try to be fair and balanced, though, are doing very well. That tells me that the American people aren't all stupid.

:rofl - This has already proven to be nothing more then the 8 - 1oz glasses vs. 1 8oz glass argument. Fox News being the ONLY conservative news outlet out there has more viewers then MSNBC, CNN, ABC etc etc because FOX Viewers consider all those other News Outlets to be 'liberal'.
 
It isn't actual sex.

It certainly didn't mean you lost your virginity if you got one at my school.
It is sex, oral sex that is. Diseases can still spread and everything.

Anyway, if anyone was thinking that there is no liberal bias in the media, they are only fooling themselves.Think about it, in a media that is privately owned and in the free-market, it is blatantly IMPOSSIBLE for there NOT to be biased when it comes to news. Which means if there is a news anchor, and he is a liberal, he is going to biased or the liberal side. Bias can come even when one does not know it, so for anyone to say they are unbiased, is a lie. And the people on here who say "there is no liberal bias" are biased themselves.
 
:rofl - This has already proven to be nothing more then the 8 - 1oz glasses vs. 1 8oz glass argument. Fox News being the ONLY conservative news outlet out there has more viewers then MSNBC, CNN, ABC etc etc because FOX Viewers consider all those other News Outlets to be 'liberal'.
I'm afraid human nature disagree with you. Tell me, is it possible to be unbiased 100% of the time?
 
I'm afraid human nature disagree with you. Tell me, is it possible to be unbiased 100% of the time?

What does this even have to do with what I said? Fox News being the only conservatively biased news channel out there has more viewers then the news channels considered liberally biased. It's a matter of concentration. Not 'fairness'.
 
The term fair and balanced i dont quite understand i thought journalists objective was to find out the truth what do you balance the truth with?

Having said that i would guess its likely there are more liberals than conservatives in the mainstream media based on their backgrounds and who their peers are likely to be.
 
The term fair and balanced i dont quite understand i thought journalists objective was to find out the truth what do you balance the truth with?...
Everything is political and the truth depends on your perspective. Perception is reality.
 
:rofl - This has already proven to be nothing more then the 8 - 1oz glasses vs. 1 8oz glass argument. Fox News being the ONLY conservative news outlet out there has more viewers then MSNBC, CNN, ABC etc etc because FOX Viewers consider all those other News Outlets to be 'liberal'.
I've never seen a liberal admit that all the others are liberal and since you parrot that its no surprise.
 
I've never seen a liberal admit that all the others are liberal and since you parrot that its no surprise.

So ad hom when your argumentum ad populum regarding Fox News being popular because it's 'fair and balanced' and not because it's only one of it's kind who panders to conservatives/Republicans? Your concession is accepted.
 
So ad hom when your argumentum ad populum regarding Fox News being popular because more people watch it and not because it's only one of it's kind who panders to conservatives/Republicans? Your concession is accepted.
Fox News is Biased toward, not conservativism, but neoconservativism. I will admit that. They are nothing but yes-men for GWB with the exception of O'reilly and Van Susteran.

As for you, i've rarely seen, if at all, any liberal admit that the media has ANY liberal bias at all.
 
Fox News is Biased toward, not conservativism, but neoconservativism. I will admit that. They are nothing but yes-men for GWB with the exception of O'reilly and Van Susteran.

Isn't this the same O'Reilly who told people to shut up once the war got started even if they didn't support it? Are you kidding me? Seriously?

As for you, i've rarely seen, if at all, any liberal admit that the media has ANY liberal bias at all.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/bias-...urdoch-s-war-journalism-3.html#post1057560852

Of course NP wouldn't factor in the fact that with all the "liberal bias" he claims going on every network but FOX that liberals would obviously have more choice and thus each network would get a smaller number of viewers then FOX. Add all the liberal news together and put them up against FOX. FOX loses out big time. It's kind of like filling a single glass with nothing but sh!t and 4 other glasses with a mix of sh!t and water then wondering why the first glass is sh!ttier then the rest. Never mind...it's exactly like that. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Now you have.
 
I've never seen a liberal admit that all the others are liberal and since you parrot that its no surprise.

Well, let me be the first. All the others are Liberal.

That makes me happy. In fact, I would like for them to be even more Liberal.

Welcome to the channel 69 news team.... Brian Moore, the news anchor... Bob Avakian is our international correspondent... Michael Moore at the Sports Desk... and the weather team is the actual Weathermen.
 
So ad hom when your argumentum ad populum regarding Fox News being popular because it's 'fair and balanced' and not because it's only one of it's kind who panders to conservatives/Republicans? Your concession is accepted.

I see a hidden liberal agenda so vast in FOX NEWS that I can`t even stand to watch anymore...,well OK ,I do still watch. About 10 seconds at a time,a couple times a month. Fox News is a clown act,put on for YOUR entertainment...( not you,The generic yous). My news comes from Y`ALL ,and CNN, and the local tv news programming ,never the garbage wrap called ,"The Tennessean",(Nashvilles own newsless paper). News is entertainment and seldom reported as such ,to be useful ,in us makeing decisions/changes as need be in our worlds,our lives. I am becomeing attached to the DPers for news and views.
 
The term fair and balanced i dont quite understand i thought journalists objective was to find out the truth what do you balance the truth with?

Having said that i would guess its likely there are more liberals than conservatives in the mainstream media based on their backgrounds and who their peers are likely to be.

I am most often happy when I am thinking( 1st rate...? You make the call). Fox News is only selling their brand of,
"Fair and Balanced",to those that would be taken in by the notion of those clowns being either. You are correct...,news should have a vast element of truth. Liberals do outnumber conservs too.
 
So ad hom when your argumentum ad populum regarding Fox News being popular because it's 'fair and balanced' and not because it's only one of it's kind who panders to conservatives/Republicans? Your concession is accepted.
When the parrot squawks louder it still sounds the same.
 
It is sex, oral sex that is. Diseases can still spread and everything.
Oral sex is just a phrase. It doesn't count as sexual intercourse technically and certainly not socially. You could have done it a thousand times and you'd still be a virgin if you hadn't had sexual intercourse.
 
The media is more centrist, social liberally and corporate than just liberal. The mass media puts forward this sort of general front. It isn't some cabal though, it is a generally tendency. It actually it perhaps more potent in none News/current affairs/documentaries than it is in them because it goes so undetected and under the radar in these. The amount of entertainment TV shows that put out a traditionalist and/or emphatically Christian message in the UK and what I've seen from the US is very low.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom