No Kings Protest Leads to Confrontation, Threats

[Cosmo]

I'm glad that she is safe, was protected by police, and that the MAGA whom @Integrityrespec and @Cosmo cheer on with every fiber of their being weren't able to do any harm to her.

Why would we want to harm the crazy left? We want the mentally ill to keep blaring their insanity for all to see. I hope they keep it going and bring a few friends with megaphones!

 

[CrakHoBarbie]

Why would we want to harm the crazy left? We want the mentally ill to keep blaring their insanity for all to see. I hope they keep it going and bring a few friends with megaphones!

Yes.
The insanity of abiding by Constitutional law.
How crazy!

 

[Cosmo]

They were local police nit federal goons.

You do understand what a stereotypical "king" is, right? Hint: they don't care about local jurisdiction or States' rights.

 

[phoenix2020]

Why would we want to harm the crazy left? We want the mentally ill to keep blaring their insanity for all to see. I hope they keep it going and bring a few friends with megaphones!

Look, I'd love to take you at your word, but before you can be considered credible in assessing somebody else's mental health, we're going to first need to confirm whether you are among Donald's 2% or a member of his 98%. If the former and you can share proof, then we can discuss your claims. Otherwise we'll sadly have to conclude that per Donald Trump himself, you are unqualified to assess someone's sanity.

And hey, don't blame me. Donald's the one who set the rules for you. If you have issues with it, you'll have to direct them to the Big Guy.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

[Cosmo]

Yes.
The insanity of abiding by Constitutional law.
How crazy!

It's not insane to follow the Constitution. That's why Trump's Supreme Court justices have taken steps to restore the 2nd amendment.

 

[Cosmo]

The local cops don't work for the President.

And stereotypical kings don't give a shit about that jurisdiction and States' rights stuff. Thanks for making my point for me!

People like this do:

 

[Cosmo]

Your post means that trump is the government.

You're talking about independent LOCAL government. Do you think a stereotypical king would give a shit about that concept? The very fact that you brought them up as an independent organization undoes the left's "king" argument.

 

[SCrider]

And stereotypical kings don't give a shit about that jurisdiction and States' rights stuff. Thanks for making my point for me!

which is why he is sending in federal troops into cities for no real reason.

 

[CrakHoBarbie]

It's not insane to follow the Constitution.

Yet donald isnt even sure he needs to abide by the Constitution.
Even after he took an oath to abide by it in January.

Trump, asked if he has to 'uphold the Constitution,' says, 'I don't know'

In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, President Donald Trump says he’s following the Supreme Court but wouldn’t say if he’s compelled to uphold the ...

www.google.com

 

[Cosmo]

Look, I'd love to take you at your word, but before you can be considered credible in assessing somebody else's mental health, we're going to first need to confirm whether you are among Donald's 2% or a member of his 98%. If the former and you can share proof, then we can discuss your claims. Otherwise we'll sadly have to conclude that per Donald Trump himself, you are unqualified to assess someone's sanity.

And hey, don't blame me.

You must be confusing me with someone who gives a shit about your assessment of my qualifications.

Donald's the one who set the rules for you. If you have issues with it, you'll have to direct them to the Big Guy.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

[Cosmo]

Yet donald isnt even sure he needs to abide by the Constitution.
Even after he took an oath to abide by it in January.

Trump, asked if he has to 'uphold the Constitution,' says, 'I don't know'

In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, President Donald Trump says he’s following the Supreme Court but wouldn’t say if he’s compelled to uphold the ...

www.google.com

I noticed you excluded the part about the 2nd amendment, the substance behind my post! Of course that's because your side just likes to throw the word Constitution around; you don't actually support its content!

 

[phoenix2020]

You must be confusing me with someone who gives a shit about your assessment of my qualifications.

Got it, you're in Donald's 98%.

Therefore all posters can ignore your claims on mental acuity.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

[CrakHoBarbie]

I noticed you excluded the part about the 2nd amendment, the substance behind my post! Of course that's because your side just likes to throw the word Constitution around; you don't actually support its content!

I support the 2nd amendment.
I've been an avid firearm collector and reloader for nearly half a century.
Thus, once again, your talking about things you know nothing about.

 

[The AntiDonald]

It's not insane to follow the Constitution. That's why Trump's Supreme Court justices have taken steps to restore the 2nd amendment.

Proof right here that only thing that matters to MAGA is the 2nd A. Praise the almighty gun.

 

[soap box]

You're talking about independent LOCAL government. Do you think a stereotypical king would give a shit about that concept? The very fact that you brought them up as an independent organization undoes the left's "king" argument.

Wait so the servants of the government/the "king" protected the No Kings protester?

That can be seen in the contrast that a lone protester was guarded by local police, but trump bombs dissenters with more BS. His specious claim that he can't do the job with local government means he's justified by sending NG to Chicago? Nope.

That's ironic. The local police want to respect her and Trump wants to sh*t on her.

That's the tip of the iceberg so that makes this very symbolic. He'll interfere in any level of government if there's more power in it for him. Ask Greg Abott.

So if our dear leader can't control the local police, it's because he's just getting started. You haven't already seen enough?

 

[devildavid]

It's not insane to follow the Constitution. That's why Trump's Supreme Court justices have taken steps to restore the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd Amendment is not in need of restoration. They should focus on all the other ones that Trump is trying to trample on. Of course Trump once suggested that they could take the guns first and go through due process second. The man has no clue about the constitution or the bill of rights at all and he doesn’t really care.

 

[Koala]

King is a stupid word to use, I think authoritarian populist, or dictator is closer. King neither claims nor cares about backing of population. There is no even hope or expectation of populism or democratic mandates with a KIng. A monarch is. There are lots of so called Democratically elected leaders that are very authoritarian and seek to erase any sort of real political opposition. I.e. rather than win the battle of ideas, they look to just eliminate the opposition.

Understanding that Trump is simply an authorian populist would help Democrats tremendously in understanidn how to beat him. They have to win at the voting booth, by a large margin. This robs authoritarian leaders of the ability to claim backing of the population, which is important for them.

Wherreas for Kimgs, the only way to beat them is to threaten them with chop chop of their heads, ala the French revolution. We are not at the state where the only way to beat Trump is to kill him or chase him into exile. He can be removed at the voting booth, but they need a landslide victory, and those victories have to come not only in Presidential election, but at state and local elections by beating the Republican Party in every major legislative body.

 

[Cosmo]

Got it, you're in Donald's 98%.

Therefore all posters can ignore your claims

...and yet here you are replying, unable to stay away!

on mental acuity.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

I support the 2nd amendment.

You don't, and I'll prove it to you right now:

Post in thread 'New Mexico governor temporarily suspends open, concealed carry across Albuquerque: 'Violence at every turn''

Sep 9, 2023

Yes how dare we expect our government to follow the document that forms the basis of our country.

You are absolutely right.
We should allow single shot blackpowder muskets to be carried by everyone.
After all, those are the "arms" that the second amendment refered to.

• CrakHoBarbie

In that post, you revised history to imply that only single-shot weapons were around at the time, but that's not true. Repeating arms were already around.

I've been an avid firearm collector and reloader for nearly half a century.
Thus, once again, your talking about things you know nothing about.

That can be seen in the contrast that a lone protester was guarded by local police, but trump bombs dissenters with more BS.

You're talking about the AI video with pilot Trump? Imagine that: a "king" whose greatest recourse against protesters is speech.

His specious claim that he can't do the job with local government means he's justified by sending NG to Chicago? Nope.

That's ironic. The local police want to respect her and Trump wants to sh*t on her.

That's the tip of the iceberg so that makes this very symbolic. He'll interfere in any level of government if there's more power in it for him. Ask Greg Abott.

So if our dear leader can't control the local police, it's because he's just getting started. You haven't already seen enough?

 

[Cosmo]

The 2nd Amendment is not in need of restoration. They should focus on all the other ones that Trump is trying to trample on. Of course Trump once suggested that they could take the guns first and go through due process second. The man has no clue about the constitution or the bill of rights at all and he doesn’t really care.

I care about the result. The result is the Supreme Court decision.

 

[Fearandloathing]

Are you butthurt that the left is the unpopular side and your popular uprising against the big bad dictator fantasy will remain just that?

I suspect the only one butthurt is you.

Trump's getting his asked kicked from every angle, including the moderate GOP.

He's below Biden's lowest rating....and falling.


And, there's a growing health issue along with his questionable mental fitness. This is not the time to be smug

 

[soap box]

You're talking about the AI video with pilot Trump? Imagine that: a "king" whose greatest recourse against protesters is speech.

I would consider her resistance by physically standing more meaningful than his imagination.

And you agree with him about the video, you think it's funny, is that what you voted for?

 

[devildavid]

King is a stupid word to use, I think authoritarian populist, or dictator is closer. King neither claims nor cares about backing of population. There is no even hope or expectation of populism or democratic mandates with a KIng. A monarch is. There are lots of so called Democratically elected leaders that are very authoritarian and seek to erase any sort of real political opposition. I.e. rather than win the battle of ideas, they look to just eliminate the opposition.

Understanding that Trump is simply an authorian populist would help Democrats tremendously in understanidn how to beat him. They have to win at the voting booth, by a large margin. This robs authoritarian leaders of the ability to claim backing of the population, which is important for them.

Wherreas for Kimgs, the only way to beat them is to threaten them with chop chop of their heads, ala the French revolution. We are not at the state where the only way to beat Trump is to kill him or chase him into exile. He can be removed at the voting booth, but they need a landslide victory, and those victories have to come not only in Presidential election, but at state and local elections by beating the Republican Party in every major legislative body.

King is perfect because it gets to the core of the opposition against what Trump is doing. He is breaking his constitutional oath of office as if he is above it, not defending it. This is why our country came to be. To create a country where the people govern themselves under the constitution and rule of law and represented by the congress. It was tooreject the arbitrary rulings of a king who didn’t respect their rights. Much like what Trump is doing.

 

[Koala]

King is perfect because it gets to the core of the opposition against what Trump is doing. He is breaking his constitutional oath of office as if he is above it, not defending it. This is why our country came to be. To create a country where the people govern themselves under the constitution and rule of law and represented by the congress. It was tooreject the arbitrary rulings of a king who didn’t respect their rights. Much like what Trump is doing.

Again, authotarian populist is better. He's closer to being like Putin than he is to being like MBS of Saudi Arabia. There's no real chance that Trump is trying to instill his progeny as the leaders of U.S. -- he just wants as much power as possible, and he gets that exxagerating or abusing his support in the population (which does really exist, at least 30-40% of country likes this guy apparenty) gives him an excuse to take away personal freedoms and constitutional rights. Just like Putin, a large part of the challenge with these guys is that they DO have some support in the population.

Kings dont care about their support in the population. Its completely irrelevant to them. You ever seen a protest movement against a King? Yeah, exactly nobody bothers, unless those protesters come with a guillotine

Which again, is important distinction because, with Kings, really nothing but violent revolution is gonna work. Whereas for authoritarian populists like Putin and Trump, if you can manage to undermine and decrease their support in the population, you have a good chance of removing them without violence or civil war or anyhting like that.

 

[CrakHoBarbie]

You don't, and I'll prove it to you right now:

Post in thread 'New Mexico governor temporarily suspends open, concealed carry across Albuquerque: 'Violence at every turn''

Sep 9, 2023

Yes how dare we expect our government to follow the document that forms the basis of our country.

You are absolutely right.
We should allow single shot blackpowder muskets to be carried by everyone.
After all, those are the "arms" that the second amendment refered to.

• CrakHoBarbie

In that post, you revised history to imply that only single-shot weapons were around at the time, but that's not true. Repeating arms were already around.

What does this have to do with anything?
Your statements display the most bizarre pretzel logic.
I'd love to be allowed to carry my Black powder Remington 1858 revolver around in California. But I must also acknowledge that because of the sheer number of illiterate, halfwitted, machismo troglodytes running around the city, that may not be prudent.
I appreciate that you just do what the propaganda tells you. But, this World deserves better.
Comprede amigo?

 

[Cosmo]

I would consider her resistance by physically standing more meaningful than his imagination.

And you agree with him about the video, you think it's funny, is that what you voted for?

I'd say it's one of those I didn't know I wanted it until after he did it things.