- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Any excuse to freak out over a nonexistent threat.
No one is freaking out....that's just the lefts grey matter having trouble decipherin' reality.
Still broken.
It's working for me, Kobie.
Lol I know man. It's fully intentional.
No right-winger here will ever admit they listen to Rush.
Blacklistednews...
Are you ****ing serious?
Listen MMC, if this thing was airborne, we'd already be absolutely ****ed, most of Africa would have gotten it by now and the rest of the World would be ****ting themselves, there'd have been multiple cases all across the US by now with 100's more on the way.
This insane notion that the only virus in history that we know of that's going to magically transform into an airborne virus is absolutely insane, fearmongering and ultimately irresponsible.
No one is freaking out? Are you paying ANY attention?
There have been plenty of Right leaning people that said they listen to Rush that were here and long before you ever came around. I am sure there are some threads up on it. We wouldn't want you to just use that double wide trailer paint brush.....knowwhatImean.
The "OMG WHAT IF IT BECOMES AIRBORNE" nonsense is stunningly ignorant.
Weird.
It hasn't become airborne since we discovered it in 1976. And it existed long before that.
The funny thing is all the people who refuse to accept the fact of evolution are the ones most hysterical about it evolving...:shocked2:
Blacklistednews...
Are you ****ing serious?
Listen MMC, if this thing was airborne, we'd already be absolutely ****ed, most of Africa would have gotten it by now and the rest of the World would be ****ting themselves, there'd have been multiple cases all across the US by now with 100's more on the way.
This insane notion that the only virus in history that we know of that's going to magically transform into an airborne virus is absolutely insane, fearmongering and ultimately irresponsible.
This is our military you are talking about. Whom without you would probably not exist.
Almost every conservative I know denies listening to him, maybe one or two admit it. But yea, i am sure in the volumes of materials in this fourm you could find a few.
Yeah that was a teaser to get those on the left to break out with their usual excuses.....and to help them with their thought processes. Since they like to imagine weakness.....where none exists. Their usual!
What you got to say about the CIDRAP or the 2 from Chicago. I notice you aren't saying much about those test cases either.
Just how did the animals get infected without contact? That's in the Canadian case and with the other strain of Ebola too? How are people being infected without any contact with those being infected?
Yeah that was a teaser to get those on the left to break out with their usual excuses.....and to help them with their thought processes. Since they like to imagine weakness.....where none exists. Their usual!
What you got to say about the CIDRAP or the 2 from Chicago. I notice you aren't saying much about those test cases either.
Just how did the animals get infected without contact? That's in the Canadian case and with the other strain of Ebola too? How are people being infected without any contact with those being infected?
I think it has been common knowlege ebola can be transmitted in droplet form. And that is NOT a step in the evolutionary chain to becoming airborne. This article is desinged simply to cause hysteria.
On the equivelant map of the USA, Texas would be red too. I stand by my statements.October.....
They're not properly equipped to operate in a disease hot zone.
That's why those Doctors and Specialists from Chicago and Minnesota recommend changing the terminology.....Which as we know the left does like to play with terminology. I would agree with them.....this way those on the left. Can't go PC over the term.....aerosol transmissible. How much do you think they will lobby to fight the label?
We recommend using "aerosol transmissible" rather than the outmoded terms "droplet" or "airborne" to describe pathogens that can transmit disease via infectious particles suspended in air......snip~
I pointed out the evolution thing in a different thread a couple days ago. The reaction was what you'd expect.
Pitchforks...kill the scientists, praise jeebus..yeah, I'm used to the gross ignorance from the creationist rabble.
Why is it that the only evidence for Ebola going airborne is a completely unconfirmed transmission between pigs and dogs ****ing somewhere.
Listen... again MMC, if you're gonna be this obtuse than don't play the game because honestly, you're material is absolutely laughable.
I will repeat this again.
Ebola is not an airborne virus.
Ebola has never been confirmed to be an airborne virus.
No virus, in the last 100 years of serious virology study has EVER CHANGED TRANSMISSION METHOD.
If Ebola was an airborne virus ALOT MORE people would be sick by now and we'd be looking at an Earth changing catastrophe.
Right now we're looking at a regional outbreak with limited cases abroad.
Your fearmongering nonsense is just that MMC
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?