Libertarian
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2005
- Messages
- 220
- Reaction score
- 0
That's an interesting thought.Libertarian said:since our government is controlled by women via their superior electoral power ...
flip2 said:Not to mention anti-woman.
Don't you love being labeled a male, shovanistic pig?
Libertarian said:Oh, how I used to tweak the vaginal supremacists at the RadFems boards when I would premempt their scripted leftist lexicon
He/she would be DOA with that, it's all about tactics. A politician would do much better on a "equal rights platform".Libertarian said:naugthynurse, do you deny that a poltiican stumping on a male equality rights platform would be deasd on arrival?
Yes or no?
shuamort said:He/she would be DOA with that, it's all about tactics. A politician would do much better on a "equal rights platform".
Libertarian said:Well, I could take a script right out of their playbook and say; "If the shoe fits" but that would be too "camp".....
shuamort said:He/she would be DOA with that, it's all about tactics. A politician would do much better on a "equal rights platform".
It's already been done before actually (by a woman).Libertarian said:Agreed, BUT........for clarifications sake, surely you aren't suggesting that a male politician could run a sucessful election campaign on an equal rights platform and never mention gender.....
Or better yet, if they suggested equal rights for woman AND men......do you agree that liberal reporters and the RadFems would crawl all up in their nut and demolish them on that? I think that would still be utter and complete suicide...
.Shirley Anita St. Hill Chisholm: "For the Equal Rights Amendment"
delivered 10 Aug 1970, Washington, DC
Mr. Speaker, House Joint Resolution 264, before us today, which provides for equality under the law for both men and women, represents one of the most clear-cut opportunities we are likely to have to declare our faith in the principles that shaped our Constitution. It provides a legal basis for attack on the most subtle, most pervasive, and most institutionalized form of prejudice that exists. Discrimination against women, solely on the basis of their sex, is so widespread that is seems to many persons normal, natural and right.
_____________________________________________
Sex prejudice cuts both ways. Men are oppressed by the requirements of the Selective Service Act, by enforced legal guardianship of minors, and by alimony laws. Each sex, I believe, should be liable when necessary to serve and defend this country. Each has a responsibility for the support of children
Newsflash....men, overall, do not get custody because they do not seek it...Those who do seek it, today, have a far, far better chance of getting it than anytime in our history.Libertarian said:If a male politician stumped for male equality, for fathers custody equality,
What does this mean? You seriously believe that anyone, no less a man has a right to tell a woman what she can do with her body? The flipside would be that a woman then gets to tell a man that he must have a vasectomy?Libertarian said:for male reproductive choice equality
Uhmm....maybe you missed this, but the draft ended in 1973...so what are you talking about? What's really funny about your argument is that you also believe that women do not have the right to certain jobs based on physical ability, yet you're now asking for women to be front line soldiers? Therefore, based on your crazy logic women are cool to be soldiers but not cool to be construction workers? Is that what you're saying?Libertarian said:for equality in the draft
So, praytell Mr. Science, how does one achieve this medical miracle? Do you kill people after they reach 73? Can't you come up with something better than this one, for it is too, too absurd.Libertarian said:for male lifespan equality
What does this mean? Are you afraid of women? Do you feel threatened by them? I sure don't, nor does my son or my 6 nephews who are as old as 25 and as young as 4. Maybe it's YOU whose causing a crisis in your home, for I sure don't see it anywhere else? You really sound like a *****, though I don't think that is your intention. :2bigcry:Libertarian said:to stop the crisis in self esteem in boys
I'm really slow, but what do you mean? My son and daughter go to the same high school, and neither is short-changed. Gender it seems is in the eye of the beholder, and you seem to be saying that if women are treated equally in things that really matter (not the bullshit stuff you just listed) men will be turned into what? What are you afraid of?Libertarian said:for solving the issue of "boys-shortchanged in schools"
Newsflash....men, overall, do not get custody because they do not seek it...Those who do seek it, today, have a far, far better chance of getting it than anytime in our history.
Uhmm....maybe you missed this, but the draft ended in 1973...so what are you talking about?
What's really funny about your argument is that you also believe that women do not have the right to certain jobs based on physical ability
yet you're now asking for women to be front line soldiers?
Therefore, based on your crazy logic women are cool to be soldiers but not cool to be construction workers? Is that what you're saying?
So, praytell Mr. Science, how does one achieve this medical miracle? Do you kill people after they reach 73? Can't you come up with something better than this one, for it is too, too absurd.
What does this mean?
Are you afraid of women? Do you feel threatened by them? I sure don't, nor does my son or my 6 nephews who are as old as 25 and as young as 4. Maybe it's YOU whose causing a crisis in your home, for I sure don't see it anywhere else?
It's truly amazing that you're comparing Rosa Parks to men being treated unequally to women. You, my friend, are the STRAW MAN!Libertarian said:Bus driver to Rosa Parks after telling her to sit in the back of the bus and she complains about the inequality: Are you afraid of whites? Do you feel threatened by them? I sure don't, nor does my son or my 6 nephews who are as old as 25 and as young as 4. Maybe it's YOU hose causing negroes to have to sit in the back of the bus with your demands. I sure don't see a a problem with coloreds sitting in the back."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?