$100,000 Entry to the USA Card.

[P_T]

Creating a way to enter the USA with a bag full of $$$. Is it criminal? Does it prove Criminality?

 

[Mycroft]

Creating a way to enter the USA with a bag full of $$$. Is it criminal? Does it prove Criminality?

Nope. Not criminal. It's legal.

 

[Juin]

Nope. Not criminal. It's legal.

I hope so Why quarrel with money coming in?

 

[multivita-man]

China will gladly take the Indians we're rejecting. They'll use them to help pay for their retirees.

 

[Mr Person]

Crass as anything could be.

Trump is ****ing America with dreams of confused grandeur.

 

[P_T]

So 10 come in + a $ Million a week. The Donald flies to play golf and watch NFL games for $!0 million a week.
Ask one Selves, what's ruining the USA!

There are no grandeur thing coming for the majority of the USA population, just more lies.

 

[aociswundumho]

It's not criminal, it's stupid. If you have a highly skilled immigrant, who is going to benefit the country, why would you want to charge him to come here? Even if you hate the idea of foreigners coming to the US, you should still want the gates wide open for highly skilled immigrants.

 

[Pyrite]

Creating a way to enter the USA with a bag full of $$$. Is it criminal? Does it prove Criminality?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/09/26/trump-ignore-rules-visas/

The Trump administration’s announcement last week about the new regulations for H-1B visas, including that most will now require a $100,000 fee, made headlines. But few pointed out that, as usual, the president played fast and loose with the rules, which in this case require a prior period of public notice and comment, while invoking national security to levy the fee.
r
This pattern has been followed since President Donald Trump’s inauguration. One of his early actions was to fire more than a dozen inspectors general, disregarding the law that required citing specific reasons for each firing, as well as granting 30 days’ notice.

The administration seems to be ignoring and flouting laws and rules purposefully, to erode the checks on its authority. It could have pushed Congress to pass legislation raising tariffs to whatever Trump wanted — the Republican majorities there have denied him practically nothing. Similarly, it could have asked Congress to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development, because foreign aid has rarely been popular. Instead, Trump took unilateral executive action. The administration is deliberately refusing to play by the rules, in ways that look to most observers like usurpations of authority and accumulation of power. Some are deeply troubled by this; others brush it off. But the question I want to ask is this: Why has America’s vaunted system of checks and balances proved so weak?

When you look at Western democracies today, the United States stands out. Amid the widespread rise of populism, discontent with various establishments and angry political rhetoric, the U.S. appears to have moved further than any other down the path of illiberal democracy, where constitutionalism and the rule of law are being steadily undermined. Hungary is the obvious other example, but Hungary is a very young and fragile democracy, scarred by decades of communism. The United States is the oldest constitutional democracy in the world. And yet, Sweden’s V-Dem Institute, which measures the condition of democracies around the world, has described the erosion of American democracy as “unprecedented” in scale....

 

[Pyrite]

Creating a way to enter the USA with a bag full of $$$. Is it criminal? Does it prove Criminality?

https://www.cato.org/blog/trump-shouldnt-impose-100000-fee-h-1b-visas

President Trump is imposing a $100,000 fee to obtain an H‑1B visa, the primary visa for skilled foreign workers. To be clear, this $100,000 fee is in addition to the salary, lawyer fees, and other costs of hiring an H‑1B worker. This fee would effectively end the H‑1B visa category by making it prohibitive for most businesses to hire H‑1B workers. This would force leading technology companies out of the United States, reduce demand for US workers, reduce innovation, have severe second-order economic effects, and lower the supply of goods and services in everything from IT and education to manufacturing and medicine.

President Trump also banned new H‑1B workers in a similar presidential proclamation in June 2020, claiming that they hurt US workers during the pandemic-induced economic crisis. Fortunately, a court found in October 2020 that the action was illegal, and the statutory authority did not exist for the president to rewrite US immigration law to micromanage the US labor market. This helped businesses retain jobs during the pandemic as IT workers aided the shift to remote work.

Adjusting the H‑1B visa fee, which is established by regulation, would require a notice and comment rulemaking, not a presidential proclamation. Even so, except for specific statutory fees, the only basis for the government to issue fees is to recover costs of adjudicating applications. Trump’s $100,000 fee has no statutory basis for fees. Given the vague authorities in immigration law, however, there is some reason for concern that the courts would uphold this action....

 

[P_T]

They have no clue how to fix $40 trillion in debt. I think Digital Currency.
Ya just pay the debt off in one swoop with Digital Currency. Whats in the past
is 20 years ago and counting down to 0 owed. Digital fixes it all.