I guarantee you that NONE of the weapons used were assault rifles.You are a liar. It is being reported that 2 of the weapons were assault rifles. You are a liar. LIAR!!
I guarantee you that NONE of the weapons used were assault rifles.
Therefore, you have lied.
Dont agree?
Specify what assault rifles were used.
Isnt amazing how those that are most against guns are those that know the least about them?Probably too dim to understand that an assault rifle is a machine gun
Isnt amazing how those that are most against guns are those that know the least about them?
It is an unfortunate situation for sure. If one of those people had chosen to responsibly carry, it could have been prevented. Instead they relied on the cops for protection; and cops can't instantaneously beam themselves to the troubled spots (not sure I'd like them to have that ability either), plus they don't have to help you out. I feel bad for the victims, but I hope this doesn't fuel another "let's ban all guns" crap thing because being unarmed is well more dangerous than the occasional psycho.
Isnt amazing how those that are most against guns are those that know the least about them?
Not at all...in fact its quite logical. Gun fanatics would obviously know the most about guns because it is their hobby. They are also the ones most likely to oppose any kind of restriction, reasonable or otherwise.
I believe everyone should own a handgun and know how to use it. I think anything bigger and not single-shot shouldn't be in the hands of the public. Does that make me a gun-nut or an anti-gun nut?
Anti-gun nut.
You're saying everyone should be required to own a dueling pistol, and not allowed anything else, if I'm interpreting your "in the hands of the public" correctly.
Not at all...in fact its quite logical. Gun fanatics would obviously know the most about guns because it is their hobby. They are also the ones most likely to oppose any kind of restriction, reasonable or otherwise.
Whch is quite natural, given that they understand the subject far better than those that look to impose restrictions on the law abiding.Not at all...in fact its quite logical. Gun fanatics would obviously know the most about guns because it is their hobby. They are also the ones most likely to oppose any kind of restriction, reasonable or otherwise.
On the surface, it makes you irrational.I believe everyone should own a handgun and know how to use it. I think anything bigger and not single-shot shouldn't be in the hands of the public. Does that make me a gun-nut or an anti-gun nut?
I believe everyone should own a handgun and know how to use it. I think anything bigger and not single-shot shouldn't be in the hands of the public. Does that make me a gun-nut or an anti-gun nut?
Anti-gun nut.
You're saying everyone should be required to own a dueling pistol, and not allowed anything else, if I'm interpreting your "in the hands of the public" correctly.
the anti-gun crowd argues from a position of ignorance.
What the hell is going on in this country?
Is it just me or is there an awful lot of gun play going on in this country?
....
What arguments sound like ignorance?From what I see, the "gun crowd" does everything from a position of ignorance.
"Should" doesn't equal "required". I'm cool with handguns, shotguns, sniper rifles, bb guns, and Super Soakers, but I don't see what anyone who isn't actively fighting a war in another country needs to be firing a semi-automatic weapon for. Same with machine guns and grenades. You don't hunt deer with an AK-47, you don't scare off muggers with a weapon too large to conceal, and generally a clipfrom a pistol should be enough to deal with an assailant; that is, unless you're a really terrible shot. My greatest terrorism-related fear involves someone purchasing a semi-automatic or full automatic weapon, carrying it into a major city in an instrument case or something, and opening fire in the middle of Times Square/a crowded theater/a sporting stadium.
If there's even been a more meaninlgess assertion that yours, above, I've not seen it.From what I see, the "gun crowd" does everything from a position of ignorance.
If there's even been a more meaninlgess assertion that yours, above, I've not seen it.
There's no doubt, whatosever, that virtually ALL of the pro-gun people on this board know more about the subject than YOU.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?