Hi Polgara :2wave:
The original historical phrase is "One riot, one Texas ranger."
Historically before recent liberal revisionist history. it was about an illegal boxing prize fight match and the local Mexicans going from being lazy pinto beans to becoming Mexican jumping beans on the streets of El Paso and the surrounding area.
The local authorties telegraphed the Governor of Texas requesting help. A couple of days later the train rolled into El Paso and one Texas Ranger got off the train. The local officials asked where are the other Rangers ? The Texas Ranger said "One riot, one Texas Ranger."
In the past twenty or so years the liberal historians (revisionist) have been attacking the Texas Rangers history because they never have been politically correct. No other American law enforcement agency has shot and killed so many Mexicans than the Texas Rangers. The Texas Rangers is one of the oldest law enforcement agencies in America. Before the creation of the U.S. Border Patrol, it was the Texas Rangers who protected the border along the Rio Grande. And they did a better job than the federal government ever has.
The Texas Rangers were the elite "peace officers" and Indian fighters of America. They are Americana.
It's a disgrace that the liberal revisionist are targeting the Texas Rangers.
But isn't that what liberal revisionit do, attack Americana ?
That article is from 28 August.
Dude is basically proud that they shoot Mexicans.
Simpleχity;1062289358 said:Point 1) IIRC, in mid-June the USS Kearsarge and the USS San Antonio docked in the Jordanian port of Aqaba as part of Exercise Eager Lion 2013 which is an annual exercise with allies in the region. Before the warships departed for Eilat, Israel however, around 300 US Marines from the 26th MEU remained in Jordan. Their task was to assist in training Syrian rebels in Jordan. The first unit of these US trained rebels entered Syria from Jordan only a few days before the gas attack on August 21.
Point 2) Granting overflight rights to US cruise-missiles is technically not launching an attack from Jordanian soil.
Now unlike the warmongering, bloodthirsty chickenhawk neo-cons of the Iraqi War, I never said invade.
Back when Clinton launched a few missiles in retaliation no self respecting Con called that blood thirsty did they?
So you seem to be making crap up.... but then again that seems to be a Con tactic....eace
No just bomb them from afar and assist Al Qaeda as they murder Christians. You're the neocon and you're not even aware of it. I never supported the Iraq War. I hate all wars. You're the phony who wants to bomb innocent brown people while at the same time helping Al Qaeda. Have you seen the videos of the "rebels" murdering Christians. Why are you and Obama supporting these bloodthirsty monsters?
Satellites cost money. Satellites can only cover a fraction of the world's oceans. That's why the Soviets/ Russians, Chinese spent billions on satellites to keep track of where our ships were. Lets keep them spending billions. We're still spending tens of billions on spy satellites.
Do you know why U-2's are still flying today ?
Or do nothing and allow Iranian terrorists to do the same once the rebellion is put down. Somehow I don't see Assad in a live and let live mood once the fighting dies down- note I don't say ceases all together.
WTF do you mean by bringing color of skin into this?
You fixate on Sunni terrorists while ignoring Shiite ones? Seriously?
This isn't a missile strike to topple Assad, but to punish the use of Chemical weapons.
I am not a neo-con. I didn't support regime change in Iraq nor planting the seeds of democracy in a desert. I'm more the guy who sweeps up after the crap fest that was neo-con penis waving.
Face it- Neo con hubris has set in motion a series of events that are not all that positive. Ending our mission in Iraq didn't end the trouble. the Con debacle in Iraq has created a new vietnam syndrome causing the once puffing and strutting American citizen is fear any military action- even one the Cons decry as an empty gesture- while other cons claim it will kill thousands... :roll:
I understand the fixation some have on christians, but thousands of other folks are being killed as well. Might want to use a telescope and not a microscope.
I suppose we could fall back on Ouija Boards and goat entrails.:roll:
For the benifit of the History Chanel? (We have more advanced types today).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?