• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

“I’ve Delivered”: New Disclosures Demolish President Biden’s Denials on Hunter Dealings

VySky

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
49,307
Reaction score
19,593
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
The drip drip drip here is stating to drown Jose. I feel sorry for him.
—////

disclosures are demolishing the continued denials of President Biden that he had no knowledge and nothing to do with his son’s business interests. The emails (reviewed by Fox and The Daily Mail) include exchanges with at least 14 of Hunter Biden’s business associates while Joe Biden was vice president. They cast further doubt on the president’s repeated claims that he had no knowledge of his son’s foreign business dealings. In one almost plaintive email, Hunter actually complains to an associate that he had delivered on everything that was demanded of him in getting access to his father and the White House.

President Biden and the White House continue to repeat his denial from the campaign trial in 2019: “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” These denials have continued even after an audiotape surfaced showing President Biden leaving a message for Hunter specifically discussing coverage of those dealings.

Some of us have written for two years that Biden’s denial of knowledge is patently false. Indeed, it is baffling how Attorney General Garland can ignore the myriad of references to Joe Biden in refusing to appoint a special counsel.

“I’ve Delivered”: New Disclosures Demolish President Biden’s Denials on Hunter Dealings

New disclosures are demolishing the continued denials of President Biden that he had no knowledge and nothing to do with his son’s business interests. The emails (reviewed by Fox and The Daily Mail…
jonathanturley.org
 
That is all ya' got?
 
Yup. It was 2019 for me.
That firing of the Ukraine prosecutor was to protect Hunter and Joe.
 
jnug said:
That is all ya' got?
Click to expand...
It’s a slow going like that 1/6 Dog & Pony Show.. Biden will hopefully see justice. Trump too, except vindictive justice will not find its way to Trump. There’s no there there.
 
VySky said:
It’s a slow going like that 1/6 Dog & Pony Show.. Biden will hopefully see justice. Trump too, except vindictive justice will not find its way to Trump. There’s no there there.
Click to expand...
lol keep pretending your guy isn't a criminal, it always amuses.
 
VySky said:
“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” These denials have continued even after an audiotape surfaced showing President Biden leaving a message for Hunter specifically discussing coverage of those dealings.
Click to expand...
I guess English is not your first language. The fact that Biden left a message referencing a NYTimes article on the subject does NOT mean that he has ever spoken to his "son about his overseas business dealings". Feel free to try again - or perhaps just read your own links a little more thoroughly next time.

And when was the last time any AG empowered a special counsel to investigate any American's foreign business dealings? I've never heard of anything so ridiculous. You must have very vivid dreams.
 
Let's tell it as it is.

He is never going to be prosecuted for anything.

The Dems have a good thing going.

He will sign whatever is placed in front of him.

Even if the GOP wins back the White House in 2024, it would never, ever prosecute him.

By that time, he will be really, really mentally frail.

To prosecute him would be elder abuse.
 
Read your attached source and it really says not much.
Maybe Biden meet with some of his sons business partners.
That alone is a big nothing burger.
Nothing has ever been shown or proven that Biden used his office as VP to provide 'favors' to any of those business partners.
 
IF the democrats say it about someone who is a republican you know they are just talking about what someone in their own party has done.
The Trump Collusion, now we see the Biden family heavily involved with pay for play with foreign governments and businesses. The corrupt Trump administration? NOw we see the Biden DOJ/FBI has been hiding the facts on the Bidens for several years.
Dems claim Trump called a world leader to ask about corrupt government officials in the US, and now we see recordings of Joe and Hunter discussing corruption, we also see numerous records from the Obama/Biden administration documenting Joes' meeting with Hunter's business partners.
 

So how come he didn't cite the code of the law broken? Is there a law that says a father can't communicate - ever - with his son's business associates? I never knew that.

And when will they be indicted?
 
Johnathan Turley. One of the most radical RW lawyers in the country. His opinion means nothing to rational thinking people.

Got news for ya. Jose is not drowning. Nobody cares about these hit pieces.
 
VySky said:
It’s a slow going like that 1/6 Dog & Pony Show.. Biden will hopefully see justice. Trump too, except vindictive justice will not find its way to Trump. There’s no there there.
Click to expand...
So where does a term like "demolish" in the thread title come from. I saw NOTHING that demolished ANYTHING in the linked piece. I barely saw anything that was even news. In fact there was no news in the linked piece.
 
My gawd, Vy. Once again you have outdone yourself in spreading incorrect information while not infusing any common sense into your OP'/posts.

Let me explain and show how all you are trying to do is degrade Biden no matter what the facts are.

To begin with, Hunter is Biden's son and anything Biden has done to defend his son is understandable. Family is always of tantamount importance to a caring person. Simply stated, if he has to give a white lie to protect his son, it cannot be prosecuted.

"Can your parents be forced to testify against you?

Parent-Child Privilege Act of 2003 - Amends the Federal Rules of Evidence to provide that, in a civil or criminal proceeding, a parent shall not be compelled to testify against his or her child, and a child shall not be compelled to testify against his or her parent, unless the parent or child who is the witness"

Now to the important part of your misinformation campaign. From your OWN LINK (from the Daily Mail)
  • Joe Biden called Hunter in December 2018 saying he wanted to talk to him after reading a New York Times story about Hunter's dealings with the Chinese oil giant CEFC
  • Files on Hunter's abandoned laptop previously disclosed by DailyMail.com show that he struck a deal with the Chinese company worth millions of dollars
  • The Times' 2018 story pointed out CEFC's chairman Ye Jianming had been arrested in China and his lieutenant Patrick Ho had been convicted of bribery
  • Hunter accidentally recorded himself referring to Ho as the 'spy chief of China'
  • After seeing the story online, Joe called Hunter and left a voicemail
  • 'I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good. I think you're clear,' Joe said in the voicemail
  • The message flies in the face of the president's repeated denials that he ever discussed Hunter's overseas business dealings with his son
This clearly shows that Joe was NOT aware of what his son was doing while he was doing it (was not a participant). Hunter called his father AFTER he found out what was going to be published. All Joe said is "I think you are clear"

This is all a "fine print" situation. Joe found out about Hunters problem and stated that he had never discussed Hunter's overseas business dealings with his son (true statement). The reality is that he did NOT DISCUSS his business dealings with his son, he just heard about them and gave his opinion "I think you are clear". That is not considered "discussing". It is called "listening" and giving his opinion.

It is a "fine print" issue and yet you have now produced at least 4 OP's debasing Joe for simply doing his job as a father. He was not in on what Hunter did but you continue to insinuate otherwise.

To finish it off, you continue to use extreme right media bias (FOX and Daily Mail) and never produce any non-partisan articles that support these views. Evidently, only the right is going after Joe on this issue and doing it with misinformation.

You continue to dig a deeper hold for yourself. You are now deep into the garbage dump, which is where the smell is the worst.
 

 
What amuses me is that people think government people are incapable of this type of thing when THAT is what they do. Steal, connive and corrupt every freaking one of them.
 
bubbabgone said:
Yup. It was 2019 for me.
That firing of the Ukraine prosecutor was to protect Hunter and Joe.
Click to expand...
bubbabgone said:
It's sadly funny that the less a person knows about it the more eager they are to deny it but not learn about it.
Click to expand...

This 2016 letter proves that GOP attacks on Biden over Ukraine are nonsense

It wasn’t just Biden who wanted reform in the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office. Republican senators did, too.
www.vox.com

Bet you didn't know Ron Johnson was a secret Biden loving commie, did you? Not sad. Not funny. Typical.
 
 
bubbabgone said:
Yup. It was 2019 for me.
That firing of the Ukraine prosecutor was to protect Hunter and Joe.
Click to expand...
You've been believing a lie since 2019? Sad.
 
Hunter is not the president ....... why your obsession with Hunter? You must be bored, have nothing to do
or are in need of supplements. You spam Hunter day in and day out yet still have never produced any hard
evidence neither have your several FAKE news sources.
 
My god get an indictment already


You can't



Dismissed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…