- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 6,665
- Reaction score
- 6,278
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
If you say so.
But she is that entitled.
If you say so.
Well cmon now. :lol:
Hillary Camp to Media: 'Her Speech Will Be Her Interview'......
As I said on Monday, there's no reason to glom onto phony alleged manifestations of Hillary's tone-deaf insularity. She and her team will mint those all on her own. Here's a genuine memo to the press from Queen Pro Quo's campaign, regarding her upcoming remarks on voting rights:
According to the Washington Post's running clock -- which exists because of her extraordinary inaccessibility to the news media, despite being an active candidate for the presidency -- Hillary Clinton hasn't entertained a single question from a reporter since the early afternoon of May 22. Twelve days and counting. Based on the missive above, "NO opportunities" for questions at today's Texas event, where journalists are to remain behind the barricades and use only their designated rest room.
Two public opinion surveys released this week show Hillary Clinton's favorability underwater among Americans, a dramatic downturn from the high marks she garnered while at the State Department.....snip~
Hillary Camp to Media: 'Her Speech Will Be Her Interview' - Guy Benson
rest rooms located down the hall to the left of the media area.
Hillary knows answering questions will hurt her campaign. But she will kick children off a playground to help it.
It really brings up some questions about her.
Well we already knew that, when her people were in Benghazi and she didn't even check back to see if they made out alive. That's all any needed to know.
No one wants any kind of person like that thinking they have power.
So why do the dems want to give her the Presidency?
Because she will still carry BO's special packaging. Help keep him relevant.
So why do the dems want to give her the Presidency?
Yup. Check this out...
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...-rules-fund-raise-clinton.html#post1064688257
The dems can't even stick to their own self imposed rules. The DNC finance chair is doing whatever he feels like to help ole cankles.
Because otherwise:
1) People will starve
2) Health care will be non-existent, except for the wealthy
3) The wealthy will get wealthier at the expense of the poor (because that's where the real money is)
4) Endless war
5) Unaffordable higher education
6) Illegal immigrants won't get a fair shake
7) The air, water and ground will be poisoned and we'll all cook
8) Corporatism will trump everything
9) Social programs will be gutted
10) Women will be trampled
11) Blacks will be trampled
12) Hispanics will be trampled
13) Gays will be trampled
14) A theocracy will be established
15) The military-industrial complex will absorb most of the budget
16) Bush!
17) Children will suffer
18) Cheney!
19) Iraq!
20) Everything else will be vewwy, vewwy bad.
Naturally, this is just a partial list.
Because otherwise:
1) People will starve
2) Health care will be non-existent, except for the wealthy
3) The wealthy will get wealthier at the expense of the poor (because that's where the real money is)
4) Endless war
5) Unaffordable higher education
6) Illegal immigrants won't get a fair shake
7) The air, water and ground will be poisoned and we'll all cook
8) Corporatism will trump everything
9) Social programs will be gutted
10) Women will be trampled
11) Blacks will be trampled
12) Hispanics will be trampled
13) Gays will be trampled
14) A theocracy will be established
15) The military-industrial complex will absorb most of the budget
16) Bush!
17) Children will suffer
18) Cheney!
19) Iraq!
20) Everything else will be vewwy, vewwy bad.
Naturally, this is just a partial list.
:lamo Check out what they are telling themselves... 10 Reasons Why Progressives Need to Vote for Hillary
That was quite an entertaining Kos piece and comments after.
Our only hope is that we can keep Democrats together long enough for the Republicans to implode sometime next year. They cannot hold together the forces unleashed by Goldwater, Nixon and Reagan, the three ideological dystopian giants who are still the bedrock of Republican thought and rhetoric.
The Democrats are hardly in better shape; the two main wings of the party distrust and hate each other so deeply, and no leader seems willing or able to try to speak sincerely to both factions. A schism here is not out of the question as well. We have the Corporate Toadies who trot out classical Democrat speak when they want to run, then rule to the hard right to keep the Plutocrats happy, who think that being all socially liberal is an excuse to rape and ravage the poor and disadvantaged. They use social and civil rights as a cloak to hide among the people, and to hide their dealings with the people who outsource, bust unions, offshore, tax shelter and overrun earth. Then we have the economic populists who somehow cannot sustain a street action because they are so tolerant they let Anarchists and Libertarians represent them and outrage the people. Not much better. We are so tolerant we let people call us racist simply because we are white, (this happened to me this weekend at a Union Convention) forgive and forget, despite the fact that we have been working hard for the rights of all people of color and gender for 60 years. Democrats like this love to maim each other when they are not getting enough attention.
:lamo Check out what they are telling themselves... 10 Reasons Why Progressives Need to Vote for Hillary
They actually believe that stuff. Amazing. This stuff should be highlighted by the MSM rather than just the inspiration behind parts of it.
Yes a bit foul mouthed but entertaining, I liked this one...
As we all know, ALL liberals take their orders from Daily Kos :roll:
Partisan blog stumps for mediocre candidate. Stop the presses. Only libs would do THAT!
I wonder why your initial thought isn't why can't Hillary change her schedule? I guess the machine has too much momentum eh?
Still, it goes to show how she's completely missing the "optics" of this. Does she really need this headline out there right now? Have you seen her polling numbers recently?
When you read some gavon saying stuff like Hillary's not Progressive enough do you wonder if they're trying to cagily establish her as some kind of moderate for readers who don't know better, or are they themselves really that far out in the stratosphere?
Granted, she may be a bigger crook than, say, Bernie Sanders who would redistribute what he stole (lord knows she's a bigger crook than most), but fercrissake she wouldn't govern like Reagan.
Same here. I don't understand why they need to close down a park for a weekend so a politician can beg for votes. But I don't know how anyone can act like this stuff is unique for Hillary or any other politician. And I think it's funny if anyone thinks that Hillary had anything to do with scheduling an event like this.
She misses the optics because she is surrounded by people who think like TheDemSocialist.
Failures fall up. Whether or not she had direct control of the day to day scheduling of her campaignshe manages the people who make the mistakes.
right ... and they're on a mission so if that means screw the kids (metaphorically) then so be it.
and ... her team are the ones who told her to spew that hate about vote suppression to a black crowd and she went out and did it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?