• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

‘Intoxicated’ Colorado man shot after stealing squad car, responding to emergency call: cops

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,776
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive

An “intoxicated,” knife-wielding Colorado man was shot by cops after stealing a marked patrol car — and then trying to respond to a domestic-violence call, according to officials.

Jeremiah James Taylor, 33 — who was already on probation for menacing, theft and DUI — broke into a Park County Sheriff’s Office substation and stole a squad car in the early hours of Monday, according to an affidavit.

He then drove to neighboring Teller County on a call about domestic violence, where “the reporting party” said he “appeared intoxicated” and had “damaged” the squad car, the affidavit said.
=============================================
I'll drink to that!
 
Yeah, stealing police cars really isn't a sensible thing to do as they tend to frown on that sort of behaviour.
 
Al least, part of the story shows the the guy was trying to do the right thing.

I suppose this is kind of like what would happen if superheroes actually apeared.

They'd end up having to pay billions in damages as they seem to completely devastate cities they're supposedly saving.

Good going Spiderman you managed to defeat the supervillian and all it took was the complete destruction of 7 skyscrapers and 2 entire boroughs of London.
It's a shame the damage costs ended up about 400 times what the villian actually demanded but hey, he's in prison now where he's almost certain to escape within a month.
 
Good going Spiderman you managed to defeat the supervillian and all it took was the complete destruction of 7 skyscrapers and 2 entire boroughs of London.
It's a shame the damage costs ended up about 400 times what the villian actually demanded but hey, he's in prison now where he's almost certain to escape within a month.
Actually, Webs didn't do too much in collateral damage. That was usually done by his super-powered Rogues.

Now the Avengers and the Fantastic Four on the other hand...
 
He wasn't shot for stealing the police car. He was shot because he was wielding a knife and threatening.
 
He wasn't shot for stealing the police car. He was shot because he was wielding a knife and threatening.

Stealing a police car doesn't help his cause though.
It would have to be a pretty damn amazing explanation to convince the police that stealing a police car was a good idea.
 
Stealing a police car doesn't help his cause though.
It would have to be a pretty damn amazing explanation to convince the police that stealing a police car was a good idea.
The man died under Darwin's law. He could have likely died under Newton's Law too, as he was driving over 100mph at one point.

Thank God he didn't kill anyone else in his idiotic drunken misadventure.
 
I suppose this is kind of like what would happen if superheroes actually apeared.

They'd end up having to pay billions in damages as they seem to completely devastate cities they're supposedly saving.

Good going Spiderman you managed to defeat the supervillian and all it took was the complete destruction of 7 skyscrapers and 2 entire boroughs of London.
It's a shame the damage costs ended up about 400 times what the villian actually demanded but hey, he's in prison now where he's almost certain to escape within a month.
I hope you understand I was being extremely sarcastic.
 
The man died under Darwin's law. He could have likely died under Newton's Law too, as he was driving over 100mph at one point.

Thank God he didn't kill anyone else in his idiotic drunken misadventure.

I don't mean to sound harsh but US car chases always seem really slow and rubbish.
I suppose it's because your roads are mostly straight but the top speeds don't seem very high at all and they crash as soon as they hit a corner.

I did a rewatch of X-Files recently and honestly, all the cars they drove were total garbage with any high speed chase topping out at about 70mph and even they they were all over the place as if that was edge of the seat super speed.
The FBI may indeed have all the money in the world but they inevitably choose total shitboxes that look like they would conk-out if they had to just drive at standard UK motorway speeds let alone have a high speed chase with some kid in his souped-up Honda civic with 10 grands worth of mods.

Sorry, that was a bit all over the place bit it just makes me smile when a US car chase is shown and the reporters talk about 60mph being a high speed thrillride chase.
 
I don't mean to sound harsh but US car chases always seem really slow and rubbish.
I suppose it's because your roads are mostly straight but the top speeds don't seem very high at all and they crash as soon as they hit a corner.
US is a huge place, and I live in Southern California which by the "statistics" has fewer accidents than other states. And to use a term by my dear cousins across the pond, that statistic is PURE rubbish. California has a very large population which offsets the statistics. We also have wonderful mild Mediterranean climate in most of the state, which basically means a ton of drivers not accustomed to driving in inclement or challenging conditions. When it rains here, the roads are mess of idiotic accidents. Add to that this modern preoccupation with social media and texting while driving, and many more unnecessary accidents. I can't expect to travel 25 miles on a local freeway in clear, dry, sparse traffic without having to deal with a back up from some accident, often a "solo spin out" which I assume was some moron not paying attention.

However, in our mountain states, and other places with snow, rain, unpaved roads, and rural highways we have many excellent drivers. And even as I am born and raised in Southern California, being a hunter, fisherman, outdoorsman, and into water and snow sports, I can drive just about any vehicle anywhere under all conditions. I always say that the true manhood test is being able to back your boat down a boat-ramp into the lake driving a standard (manual/stick transmission) while holding a beer between your knees in the dark with snow/ice on the ground, and do so successfully on the first attempt.;)
I did a rewatch of X-Files recently and honestly, all the cars they drove were total garbage with any high speed chase topping out at about 70mph and even they they were all over the place as if that was edge of the seat super speed.
Hollywood is not a good representation of much over here. Knowing how to drive a car aggressively is like the skills needed in Formula 1 racing. Stunt drivers make a lot of practice runs before getting the perfect film shot/take. Noticed by all the other tire/rubber marks already on the road for that scene.



The FBI may indeed have all the money in the world but they inevitably choose total shitboxes that look like they would conk-out if they had to just drive at standard UK motorway speeds let alone have a high speed chase with some kid in his souped-up Honda civic with 10 grands worth of mods.
Not sure about the big FBI SUVs, but for your standard police vehicle today, agencies eventually had to shift from your old style rear wheel drive sedans with large V8 engines and beefed up suspensions as American automakers have been pressured to discontinue those good old vehicles. And then with all of the modern police communication equipment, onboard computers, cameras, and more. A modern police vehicle is very heavy from all of that, and why the default now are those big stupid SUVs, normally designed for large overweight families to use to pull boats and trailers on long holiday trips.

Sorry, that was a bit all over the place bit it just makes me smile when a US car chase is shown and the reporters talk about 60mph being a high speed thrillride chase.
Well, 60mph on a residential street or a school zone would of course you agree be very high speed in that location. Also, when there is a suspect fleeing in a car and going 70-80, but all other cars nearby are stopped or going 35-40. Any collision at 80 vs 35 would be 45 miles of speed, times the mass, and distance for all that energy to decelerate in a collision, and that means if you are rear ended by say a SUV going 45mph into the rear of your Honda Civic or your 'Mini Cooper'.... an almost certain death sentence.

But I get your point.
 
In the UK the police have dedicated pursuit drivers and reasonably fast cars.
They're very well trained and have to be as we don't have anything like police immunity so if they do injure someone they will get charged.
They also can't use the same pit style manuevers your police use although they do have stinger tyre traps to burst tyres but they're strictly only used when it's deemed safe.

UK police are not allowed to use many US tactics and whether you think that's a good or bad thing is entirely up to you.

The lack of police immunity is a huge factor though.
 
In the UK the police have dedicated pursuit drivers and reasonably fast cars.
They're very well trained and have to be as we don't have anything like police immunity so if they do injure someone they will get charged.
They also can't use the same pit style manuevers your police use although they do have stinger tyre traps to burst tyres but they're strictly only used when it's deemed safe.

UK police are not allowed to use many US tactics and whether you think that's a good or bad thing is entirely up to you.

The lack of police immunity is a huge factor though.
I often waiver on the issue of qualified immunity for peace officers. On one hand I recognize the unique challenges of law enforcement when dealing with criminals, especially felons. And then at other times I can only shake my head when I see video of a police officer for example shooting through the windscreen of his cruiser at a fleeing car ahead down a residential street just because the car refused to pull over when ordered to do so. Unless that fleeing subject has a nuclear warhead he has stolen, then an officer MUST use common sense reason before something so potentially dangerous. And in a case like that where an innocent bystander is killed, I would like to see a court after determining the police officer's actions were grossly unreasonable, for that officer to be subject to individual civil liability like anyone else would be.

Problem in this country is that police, fire, and teachers unions are more powerful than atomic bombs, especially with one party in politics assured their votes.
 
I often waiver on the issue of qualified immunity for peace officers. On one hand I recognize the unique challenges of law enforcement when dealing with criminals, especially felons. And then at other times I can only shake my head when I see video of a police officer for example shooting through the windscreen of his cruiser at a fleeing car ahead down a residential street just because the car refused to pull over when ordered to do so. Unless that fleeing subject has a nuclear warhead he has stolen, then an officer MUST use common sense reason before something so potentially dangerous. And in a case like that where an innocent bystander is killed, I would like to see a court after determining the police officer's actions were grossly unreasonable, for that officer to be subject to individual civil liability like anyone else would be.

Problem in this country is that police, fire, and teachers unions are more powerful than atomic bombs, especially with one party in politics assured their votes.

The way I see it is pretty simple.
All qualified immunity does is make the police above the laws they're supposed to uphold.
The police in the US are able to use way more force than the general public and feel no obligation to calm down because they do face zero consequences.
Even if they do face consequences and they are fired they can just get another job at another police department it's utterly crazy.

The police should be held to the same standards as everyone else but US police certainly are not and they should certainly not have what amounts to get out of jail free cards for entire segments of the law.
If an officer kills someone in a car chase in the UK for example they're instantly taken off duty and an investigation started into why and if found to have been negligent they will be charged as such.
We still have plenty of people wanting to be police officers who conduct high speed persuit officers.

Qualified immunity should be abolished.
 
Back
Top Bottom