This isn't about Obama or his academic achievement as it certainly wasn't about her academic achievement either.So does Obama.
:doh1) Yes, she did.
:dohThe fact that you don't understand the history of Bell Labs and its value to this country, is shocking.
No, the irony is you are the one communicating ignorance.The irony that you are communicating that ignorance via a computer(or smartphone/tablet) , is beyond description.
:doh
Your wildly inaccurate assumptions of other people are what is shocking.
‘Higher than 90 percent’ chance Fiorina will run for president
Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina said Sunday that she is almost certain she will run for the GOP nomination for president.
Fiorina told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace that there is a “very high” chance she will run, and followed it up by specifying that the probability is “higher than 90 percent.”
If she decides to run, Fiorina wants to wait until late April or early May to announce, she said.[COLOR="#0000oo"]
[...][/COLOR]
‘Higher than 90 percent’ chance Fiorina will run for president
Really?
:doh
Why are you asking me? I provided a link, why don't you read it.How did Hewlett Packard fare on her watch?
Why are you asking me? I provided a link, why don't you read it.
I would say most folks already know, so again, why are you asking me?
Wrong. Your biased imagination is getting the best of you and leads you to make false claims.I don't have to assume anything about you; you showed it.
Yes that would be you making irrelevant and false arguments.It's clear who is more informed on the topic.
:dohYou haven't shown 1 clue about understanding the history, present, and (lack of) future for basic research (which she killed)- the hallmark of Bell Labs, and the reason you have solid state transistors, and computer chips today. I linked to a nature article about it, you pasted a puff piece from wikipedia.
Oh gawd.why is bell labs now owned by Alcatel, and why are they no longer doing basic research?
in what time frame did their financial decline begin, and when did they axe their basic research budget?
comeon, YOU know these things (so you claim). This shouldn't be hard to answer.
Oh gawd.
Here you are armchair quarterbacking and making another false claim :doh
She was not responsible for the split which changed the whole dynamics.
You are exaggerating because of your own biases.
Her career with AT&T and Lucent was successful as shown and the information you provided doesn't say otherwise.
Or do you not realize that that success was the reason she got the HP gig?
:dohI didn't say she caused the split. If you are going to lie about what I said, we're done here.
:doh
See, there is your bias getting in the way and causing an inability to comprehend what another has said, leading you again to make another false statement. Double d'oh! :doh :doh
:doh" She was not responsible for the split which changed the whole dynamics."
how else is this to be interpreted? obfuscate away
:doh
As a statement of fact.
The whole dynamics, especially in regards to funding was changed.
Again; Her career with AT&T and Lucent was successful as shown and the information you provided doesn't say otherwise.
Pay attention to what was already said.then why is Lucent owned by another company now? and why is Bell Labs not doing fundamental research anymore?
Pay attention to what was already said.
The whole dynamics, especially in regards to funding was changed.
Again; Her career with AT&T and Lucent was successful as shown and the information you provided doesn't say otherwise.
Do you or do you not realize that she got the HP gig because of her success with AT&T and Lucent?
If you can't recognize that, something is wrong.
Do you or do you not realize that she was repeatedly promoted during her tenure with AT&T and Lucent.
That doesn't happen at that level without success.
To say she wasn't successful when they recognize her success is just dumb.
No I am shaking my head at your continued false claims,smh, I know YOU won't read this, since you insist on perma-ostriching,
There is nothing really to learn in either one.
I doubt you know much about the high tech industry, business, the stock market or what qualifications are necessary for the Presidency.She was a bad CEO. She ran HP into a ditch. Not qualified.
I doubt you know much about the high tech industry, business, the stock market or what qualifications are necessary for the Presidency.
Why not watch the interview and then give your critique. Fiorina likely GOP presidential candidate, attacks Clinton
Fiorina isn't going to get anywhere near where she wants to with this and it's a waste of money. She hasn't been able to punch through the political system. Since her political experience is non-existent, she has to run on her business experience. However, her tenure at HP is lacking in inspiration at best, and at worst, was absolutely dreadful.
Yes. How many people won their party nomination the first time? I suspect, with the massive amounts of money in these campaigns any more, that it will become even more common to run the first time not to win, but to establish the campaign infrastructure that will be needed for later runs, to learn the process, to start building name recognition and establish a brand.
Interviews with close to a dozen current and former HP employees reveal that nearly 10 years after being forced out of the firm, Fiorina remains a deeply polarizing figure. Her tenure, which coincided with the bursting of the dot-com bubble, was fraught with layoffs, leadership transitions and a controversial merger with Compaq that pitted Fiorina against members of the Hewlett and Packard families in an ugly public feud.
Now, Fiorina's public flirtation with a presidential campaign is reopening those old wounds and inviting new scrutiny of her management skills, which she is selling as one of her top assets.
Jason Burnett, the grandson of the late HP co-founder David Packard and a member of the board of trustees at the Packard Foundation, once HP's largest shareholder, said in an interview that Fiorina shouldn't work at any level of government.
Carly Fiorina's HP legacy looms over her 2016 ambitions - CNN.com
Jason Burnett, who resigned from his job with the EPA to support Barack Obama for President. Jason Burnett, whose number one agenda as mayor of Carmel is making it green, reducing carbon emissions, etc. Jason Burnett, who was the darling of the left in 2008 for being a whistle blower on the Bush administration because of his job in the EPA. Jason Burnett, uber wealthy recipient of money inherited from his family connections. Jason Burnett, who according to an NY Times article on him in 2008 applauding him sharing secrets on the Bush administration, had contributed over $100,000 at 31 years old to Democratic politicians.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/us/22enviro.html?_r=0
Yes, that guy isn't the least bit biased against a Republican politician, and we should take his word for it. Good enough for me!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?