• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

‘America is not a museum’: Why Democrats are going big on housing despite the risks

Greenbeard

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
25,418
Reaction score
32,326
Location
Cambridge, MA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
All politics may be local, but the local seems to be going national this year.

‘America is not a museum’: Why Democrats are going big on housing despite the risks
CHICAGO — Democrats are trying to turn a political vulnerability, housing affordability, into a winning issue for November. The strategy carries significant risk: It’s likely to spark a host of fights across blue cities and states.
At the Democratic convention, leaders including Kamala Harris and Barack Obama built on existing momentum in both red and blue states — including Harris’ home state of California — and called for an overhaul of local zoning laws that act as barriers to new and cheaper housing. But the federal government has limited influence on these rules.

Instead, if the pleas work, it would send cheering mayors, city councilmembers and party chairs back to their hometowns to pick battles with Democrat-run planning boards and Legislatures in major metro areas and small towns alike in an effort to fulfill Harris’ pledge to build three million new homes.
The “YIMBY” pro-housing movement, or Yes In My Backyard, hasn’t had a natural political home with its center-left and center-right appeals. But with top Democrats from Obama to Harris to Polis to House Financial Services ranking member Maxine Waters devoting substantial time to the issue at the DNC, the push from the national ranks to apply pressure for more and cheaper housing is unmistakable. There could be wide appeal, from younger people disillusioned by the housing market to more conservative-leaning voters who are also feeling squeezed.

This marks a major contrast, in a race full of them.

Trump's gone full NIMBY.



Whereas the Dems are amping up the YIMBY rhetoric.





Build, baby, build.
 
LOL!! Right.

The Dems cut regulations? Not a chance.

And that blurb about Trump wanting to make housing unaffordable...a lie.

There's only one reason why housing is unaffordable right now and that's because of inflation making it cost more to build housing and the Fed making it more expensive to get loans to build and buy houses.

Trump will do what the Biden/Harris pukes won't do: Reduce the cost to build housing and tell the Fed to stop ****ing with consumer loan rates.
 
LOL!! Right.

The Dems cut regulations? Not a chance.

And that blurb about Trump wanting to make housing unaffordable...a lie.

There's only one reason why housing is unaffordable right now and that's because of inflation making it cost more to build housing and the Fed making it more expensive to get loans to build and buy houses.

Trump will do what the Biden/Harris pukes won't do: Reduce the cost to build housing and tell the Fed to stop ****ing with consumer loan rates.
Trumps Tariffs will increase inflation. So according to your metrics, housing will get more expensive under Trump.

Trump’s tariffs could spark a trade war and an ‘inflation shock’ within a year, expert warns​

 
Trumps Tariffs will increase inflation. So according to your metrics, housing will get more expensive under Trump.

Trump’s tariffs could spark a trade war and an ‘inflation shock’ within a year, expert warns​

Will? Or, could?

Get your story straight, eh? And while you are at it, provide evidence that Trump's tariffs increased inflation when he put them in place back in 2019.

Good luck.
 
Will? Or, could?

Get your story straight, eh? And while you are at it, provide evidence that Trump's tariffs increased inflation when he put them in place back in 2019.

Good luck.
Sure, no luck needed. Everyone knows his tariffs were terrible for our country but here, don't take my word for it. Why he's doing it again I'll never know, you'd think he'd not be promising to wreak the economy again during an election cycle.

A January 2021 study commissioned by the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC) claims that former president Donald Trump’s trade policies cost the United States 245,000 jobs. As a Reuters news report put it, the USCBC claimed that “a gradual scaling back of tariffs” could help stop the bleeding, while also arguing that a failure to do so would lead to even greater job losses and more sluggish growth.
Clearly, the Trump administration’s trade policies were not successful. American deficits with China and the rest of the world were higher last year than they had been in over a decade. And while it is a little unfair to consider 2020 data without recognizing the peculiar economic distortions created by the coronavirus pandemic, U.S. trade and current account deficits were much higher during Trump’s presidency than they had been under former president Barack Obama.

Trump’s Tariffs Were Much More Damaging Than Thought​

Donald Trump’s tariffs and the trade war his administration launched against China turned out to be far more damaging than many believed. That is the conclusion of research finding companies, consumers and the U.S. economy paid a heavy price for the Trump administration’s protectionist trade policies.
 
Sure, no luck needed. Everyone knows his tariffs were terrible for our country but here, ~snipped the blah, blah, blah~
Here are the facts.

1724738712691.webp

(BLS) […] The index for food at home declined for the third month in a row, falling 0.2 percent. The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs decreased 0.7 percent in August as the index for eggs fell 2.6 percent. The index for fruits and vegetables, which rose in July, fell 0.5 percent in August; the index for fresh fruits declined 1.4 percent, but the index for fresh vegetables rose 0.4 percent. The index for cereals and bakery products fell 0.3 percent in August after rising 0.3 percent in July. (link)

CPA – […] Since the Section 301 tariffs were imposed, the share of imports from China has steadily declined from 21.6% in 2017 the year prior to the tariffs to 16.5%, a decline of 5.1%. No other country has lost as much share of total U.S. import penetration over the past five years.

In terms of total import value, Mexico gained the most from the tariffs, adding $110.8 billion. Vietnam gained the second most in import value by $78.4 billion and by far gained the most of total share of U.S. imports. In 2017, Vietnam accounted for about 2% of U.S. imports at $46.5 billion. In 2022, the U.S. imported $127.5 billion in goods from Vietnam, and the share of the total nearly doubled to 3.9%. Other countries in Southeast Asia such as Thailand, Cambodia, and Indonesia all saw significant increases in their value of imports by the U.S. (read more)

1724738835709.webp

[…] Prices for imports from China edged down 0.1 percent in August following decreases of 0.2 percent in both July and June. Import prices from China have not advanced on a monthly basis since ticking up 0.1 percent in May 2018. The price index for imports from China fell 1.6 percent for the year ended in August.

[…] Import prices from the European Union fell 0.2 percent in August and 0.3 percent over the past 12 months.



So yes, we know President Trump can save Social Security and Medicare by expanding the economy with his America First economic policy. We do not need to guess if it is possible or listen to pundits theorize about his approach being some random ‘catch phrase’ disconnected from reality. Yes folks, we have the receipts.

This was MAGAnomics at work, and this is entirely what created the middle class MAGA coalition. No other candidate has this economic policy in their outlook, because all other candidates are purchased by the Wall Street multinationals.

America First MAGAnomics is unique to President Trump, because he is the only one independent enough to implement the policy.

That’s just the reality of the situation. They hate him for it…




You can keep your "expert" analysis. I'll take the cold, hard facts. Those facts show that Trump reduced energy prices and food prices. He kept inflation in check. He reduced imports from China, which hit their economy hard. He reduced imports from the EU. And he reduced the cost of the imports that we ended up buying.

And all that is a result of Trump's economic policies...including tariffs.
 
Here are the facts.

View attachment 67528928

(BLS) […] The index for food at home declined for the third month in a row, falling 0.2 percent. The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs decreased 0.7 percent in August as the index for eggs fell 2.6 percent. The index for fruits and vegetables, which rose in July, fell 0.5 percent in August; the index for fresh fruits declined 1.4 percent, but the index for fresh vegetables rose 0.4 percent. The index for cereals and bakery products fell 0.3 percent in August after rising 0.3 percent in July. (link)

CPA – […] Since the Section 301 tariffs were imposed, the share of imports from China has steadily declined from 21.6% in 2017 the year prior to the tariffs to 16.5%, a decline of 5.1%. No other country has lost as much share of total U.S. import penetration over the past five years.

In terms of total import value, Mexico gained the most from the tariffs, adding $110.8 billion. Vietnam gained the second most in import value by $78.4 billion and by far gained the most of total share of U.S. imports. In 2017, Vietnam accounted for about 2% of U.S. imports at $46.5 billion. In 2022, the U.S. imported $127.5 billion in goods from Vietnam, and the share of the total nearly doubled to 3.9%. Other countries in Southeast Asia such as Thailand, Cambodia, and Indonesia all saw significant increases in their value of imports by the U.S. (read more)

View attachment 67528929

[…] Prices for imports from China edged down 0.1 percent in August following decreases of 0.2 percent in both July and June. Import prices from China have not advanced on a monthly basis since ticking up 0.1 percent in May 2018. The price index for imports from China fell 1.6 percent for the year ended in August.

[…] Import prices from the European Union fell 0.2 percent in August and 0.3 percent over the past 12 months.




So yes, we know President Trump can save Social Security and Medicare by expanding the economy with his America First economic policy. We do not need to guess if it is possible or listen to pundits theorize about his approach being some random ‘catch phrase’ disconnected from reality. Yes folks, we have the receipts.

This was MAGAnomics at work, and this is entirely what created the middle class MAGA coalition. No other candidate has this economic policy in their outlook, because all other candidates are purchased by the Wall Street multinationals.

America First MAGAnomics is unique to President Trump, because he is the only one independent enough to implement the policy.

That’s just the reality of the situation. They hate him for it…




You can keep your "expert" analysis. I'll take the cold, hard facts. Those facts show that Trump reduced energy prices and food prices. He kept inflation in check. He reduced imports from China, which hit their economy hard. He reduced imports from the EU. And he reduced the cost of the imports that we ended up buying.

And all that is a result of Trump's economic policies...including tariffs.
His tariffs are bad for the economy. You can just continue to shun the experienced economists and call it a MAGA day! I couldn't care less.
 
His tariffs are bad for the economy.
You can continue to believe that, but the facts from back in 2019 when he had his tariffs show that they were good for the economy.
 
Back
Top Bottom