• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by VoiceOfReason

  1. V

    Will Republicans Help to Impeach Bush?

    There is a ZERO percent chance Bush will be impeached. Not .01 %. ZERO.
  2. V

    Flip flopping deja vu all over again...

    What's nuanced about it? It's exactly what you would expect the Democrat's position to be. " we'lll do the same except we'll getthe warrants"
  3. V

    52% want Bush Impeached

    You think that's sufficient. If they look into this ,and they find that the Justice Dept was convinced it was legal, but were wrong, that's enough for an impeachement? That speaks to criminal intent. And waht if they find he only tapped terrorist supect's calls< i.e., did not us ethe taps on...
  4. V

    Flip flopping deja vu all over again...

    That was weak. With Kerry, there's usually no shortage of self provided ammo to rip him wide open, but not this time.
  5. V

    New Saddam Documents Detail Terror Training

    Total BS. The CIA , the final authority, CLEARED the speech. The British intellignece stood by the story. < btw, the passage said AFRICA, not just Niger. Whatever the contradictory info, the CIA cleared it.
  6. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    It would be if Gonzales made both statements. One statement is by a spokesman, whose expertise is PR, not the law. The other was by a lawyer, whose expertise is the law.
  7. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    Sounds to me like you just wanted to a cheap shot with that poll comment. If he said nothing at all bout this, would you be accusing him of haughtiness and arrogance? C'mon, the truth?
  8. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    Wait , I thought the polls supported what he is doing?You're contradicting yourself. What influence would polls have on the legality of the thing ? Are ' the people ' going to decide that? BTW, do you think he should be impeached for doing this?
  9. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    well you tell us. which is it? does he listen to polls or doesn't he? If he does, as you imply, why is he going on the offensive?
  10. V

    Bush's big sin in Iraq: Acting uniliaterally?

    Nobody who knows anything about intel siad it was ironclad or flawless, with the exception of the CIA director, George " slam dunk " Tenet. Everybody knows you get bits and pieces of intel, some contradictory. Eventually, you have to evaluate the evidence and make a conclusion. Every Major...
  11. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    Getting back on topic. It's another example of the 'tin ear" of the left, not to mention hypocrisy. If< and this is all we know now> Bush was advised by his Justice Dept that this was legal and he was spying on terro supsects, i.e not abusing the program, do yuo REALLY think he should be...
  12. V

    Pentagon Admits Spying on Peace Activists on American Soil

    they are military contractors and ,a s such, are entitled to CIFA protection.
  13. V

    Pentagon Admits Spying on Peace Activists on American Soil

    The Defense Dept is allowed to track terroristic threats against military installations.
  14. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    I think you better brush up on your politcical history.
  15. V

    Americans overwhelming support President Bush in wiretapping.

    So far , there has been one indictment. And it wasn't for leaking a CIA agent's name. If somebody did that < leaked a covert agent's name> there would be more than one indictment. there hasn't been . comments?
See more
Back
Top Bottom