• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by SuperFan99

  1. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    What other reason would she have to claim it at all, other than to hope for favored tenure status? And why would Harvard even ask, unless they wanted to brag about how diversified their staff was? "Diversity" has been the Harvard MO for decades. True. But one also needs to be a Massachusetts...
  2. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    I think they meant only to suggest it as a way of laundering it from large domestic supporters, not as if she's popular with rank-and-file al Qaeda members or anything. Because I followed her campaign, which was about as exciting as the one Martha Coakley ran in 2010. The national popularity of...
  3. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    She claimed to be of Cherokee descent in order to gain tenure at Harvard. Once tenured, she retracted the claim. (She also acknowledged in her debate with Scott Brown that she was not of Cherokee descent). Her employment records would prove this out, but she refused to release them. How...
  4. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    Not necessarily. These funds are not required to be itemized, so there's no way of knowing who provided them and in what denominations. Either you believe that she's capable of generating three times as many small donations as the national average, or you don't. There's no way of proving guilt...
  5. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    You mean other than lying about being a Cherokee Indian, practicing law in Massachusetts without a license, and pretending to be a common man crusader despite the fact that she represented large corporations against them (and then refusing to disclose that info just prior to her debate)? Yeah...
  6. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    I'm not even sure what you're looking for from me, exactly. But if you're going to resort to childish name-calling instead of asking direct questions, then this is clearly just a waste of time. Let me know when you want to have an adult conversation. Assuming you're even capable.
  7. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    "Puzzling" and "odd" were your words, not mine. And if you don't understand the meaning of the word "plausible," then look it up. It's a pretty clear and concise word if you know the definition.
  8. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    I made no de facto assumptions of fraud. I simply raised the question of whether it was plausible, considering that she's claiming three times the number of small donations than what is normal. What's even more puzzling is how you could form this conclusion absent any evidence to support such...
  9. SuperFan99

    Conservatives and small government?

    Has it? Not disagreeing, per se, but it might interest you to know that Obama's annual rate of increasing our national debt is lower than both Reagan's and George H.W. Bush's (11.3% vs. 14.2% and 11.7%, respectively)...
  10. SuperFan99

    Sen. Warren - Bank Money Laundering

    Ok, fair point.
  11. SuperFan99

    Sen. Warren - Bank Money Laundering

    She's grandstanding. As a lawyer (though one that practiced in MA without a license), she should know better than most that 90% of all cases never go to trial.
  12. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    I didn't mean to imply any such thing. But don't you find it a bit odd that she miraculously raised three times the national average of small donations? Considering that they come from sites with questionable fundraising methods and don't need to be itemized? And has the personality of wet sand...
  13. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    Looks like a good chunk was from "unitemized" donations. Either massive fraud was being perpetrated. Or maybe it's just her breathtaking beauty and personality that got her three times more small donations than the average Senate candidate...
  14. SuperFan99

    Elizabeth Warren for President in 2016 - and here is one reason why

    She raised $42 million for her Senate race. That's not exactly grass-roots.
  15. SuperFan99

    McCain & Graham Bashes Rand Paul:

    This is the part of Eric Holder's March 4th letter that triggered the filibuster, because when Paul asked follow up questions for clarity, he was ignored:
See more
Back
Top Bottom