• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Spock

  1. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    I have no idea what point you are trying to make and I think it is futle to discuss this issue further with those who cannot invest the effort of a few neurons to the discussion.
  2. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    You think that traffic accidents somehow dimenishes the number of firearm injuries and fatalities? Why do gun nuts always want to compare bathtubs or stairs or automobiles to firearms, since firearms are largely preventable deaths and injuries? It is getting boring.
  3. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    It is not an equivalent society. Is that so hard for your to understand?
  4. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    How many fatalities from traffic accidents?
  5. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    Read the posts and think. You claimed millions of traffic fatalities and injuries.... substantiate that claim.
  6. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    Mexico is not equivalent to the US, as you well should know in almost every area of society.
  7. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    Nonsense, pure opinion, or irrelevant responses are not serious answers. You need to work on substantiating your answers.
  8. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    Substantiation?
  9. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    No cherry picking by me. Look at equivalent countries and explain the difference in firearm violence.
  10. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    You don't seem to understand that basic concept. The prevalence of firearms is correlated with firearm death and injury. Firearms result in greater death and injury during domestic disputes. Who is Jeager?
  11. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    Not an appropriate part of the discussion in this thread, but very indicative of your ignorance on multiple subjects.
  12. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    Apparently you do not consider the risk of a firearm to be an actual risk to life or limb. You do not seem to understand that a firearm is not a swimming pool. Why do you accept 100,000 firearms deaths and injuries?
  13. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    No cherry picking. These are equivalent countries that happen to differ from the US in their approach to firearms. Learn what cherry-picking means.
  14. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    The equivalent risk found in similar countries with fewer firearms. Typically that would be Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, but other advanced countries could be used.
  15. S

    ‘Numerous’ officers shot.

    You should become familiar with firearm violence in Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and Australia and compare those numbers to the US.
See more
Back
Top Bottom