• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by SJ-10

  1. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    That was Anwar. The boy was killed in a subsequent strike. Who was the target in that strike?
  2. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    I did, that's how I know those questions have no answers. If it did have the answers, you would be able to tell me them, meaning you wouldn't have read the article either. Once again, your claims have no proof. There's no point in replying to me with messages that don't contain that proof.
  3. S

    Obama: Iran a Year Away From Nuclear Weapon..[W:67]

    The same reason Iraq was invaded despite the fact that it wasn't a threat. To understand the "why" behind it I recommend a document called "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC).
  4. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    3+- You can take your leader's word for it and believe them all you want but this does not prove your claims. When claiming things as facts, you should have proof better than your leaders told you so. He is a terrorist because he plots attacks, and he's plotting an attack because he's a...
  5. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    You didn't answer either question. Who were the terrorists they were "chilling" with? You MUST know who in order to make the determination you did and make the factual claim you did. And do you retract your claim about the active plotting of an attack?
  6. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    Which terrorists were they chilling with? And does this mean you retract your allegation about them actively plotting terrorist attacks?
  7. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    The reason you don't have a number is because the number of Muslims who celebrated 9/11 isn't all that "endless".
  8. S

    Hacking More of a Threat than Terrorist Attack:

    How many people can you kill over a computer?
  9. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    One is too many.:cool: ... I mean what is the number that we should consider "nearly endless"?
  10. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    My fault.. I should have been more specific. I mean examples of the terrorist plots. I'm especially interested in for the other two Americans killed in the drone strikes, and what plot they were hatching.
  11. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    What number is that?
  12. S

    How a U.S. Citizen Came to Be in America’s Cross Hairs

    Not just hiding out in foreign lands. These leaders made it perfectly clear that you can be targeted anywhere in the world. Even on US soil. And who is a terrorist is who they say it is, and whichever of their supporters take their word for it. In other words a "terrorist" who can be killed is...
  13. S

    U.S. to let spy agencies scour Americans' finances

    Suspicious fiancial activity can be investigated by authorities, just like anything else they might be suspicious of in your home, in your car or in your pocket. And the same rules, from the Fourth Amendment, apply: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and...
  14. S

    Israel orders Palestinians out of 'tent city'

    That was already established in 1967. The official borders for Israel were established and officially agreed by UN resolution 242. The territories in the Gaza strip and West Bank are beyond them. No further negotiations are required, and Israel's refusal to agree with this ruling doesn't...
Back
Top Bottom