• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Simpletruther

  1. S

    What is (and isn't) the AGW Scientific Consensus?

    Does it have to be exactly 50 years I just told you it's a reasonable long-term planning number. The longer the better but 50 years will be kind of a minimum to be very useful policy wise.
  2. S

    What is (and isn't) the AGW Scientific Consensus?

    Well 50 years seems a minimum number when we consider "long term" and try to make any plans based upon good predictions.
  3. S

    What is (and isn't) the AGW Scientific Consensus?

    50 years is one cycle. I'm going to guess right now that the temperature will rise about 1° in the next 50 years it's very likely that I will be correct based on current trends that doesn't mean I'm a wonderful prognosticator with a good model. It will take many model runs before we know a...
  4. S

    What is (and isn't) the AGW Scientific Consensus?

    If I guess a coin toss then I have been uncannily accurate that one time. There has only been one 50 year cycle (roughly). They have been accurate once. But not exactly accurate just close...... .one time.
  5. S

    What is (and isn't) the AGW Scientific Consensus?

    So far sure. But we don't really know with much certainty at all thet the models are consistantly accurate. We only see a first 50 year reasonable accuracy. If We assume three plausible scenarios: a slight decrease of temperature; a constant temperature; or slight increase in...
  6. S

    What is (and isn't) the AGW Scientific Consensus?

    If you will just reread my post you will see I haven't denied that at all.
  7. S

    Non-Trump voters: Is Trump worse, better, or about the same as you predicted he would be?

    Funny how many doomsday prophets were describing the end of the world if he got elected
  8. S

    Non-Trump voters: Is Trump worse, better, or about the same as you predicted he would be?

    Funny how many were other doomsday prophets if he got elected, and yet there's nobody here saying he wasn't as bad as they thought LOL We're now worse off than doomsday LOL
  9. S

    The glimmer in his eyes and his smirk reveals that Vance would be thrilled if Trump dies or is removed from office.

    Always there with the tribal cheerleaders lol ^
  10. S

    The glimmer in his eyes and his smirk reveals that Vance would be thrilled if Trump dies or is removed from office.

    VDS
  11. S

    MAGA Candidate Takes Flamethrower To Quran In Disturbing Video

    And your side
  12. S

    JD Vance says he's "ready to take over as president"

    love Him or hate him Vance has political chops. He is a much better politician than trump.
  13. S

    MAGA Candidate Takes Flamethrower To Quran In Disturbing Video

    The "piss Christ" was defeated by the left. Not interested in fake outrage.
  14. S

    On climate models

    Stupid post ^
  15. S

    On climate models

    Quote me disputing data. What conclusion?
See more
Back
Top Bottom