• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by PTPLauthor

  1. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Spoken like a true Conservative ass clown. This isn't Nazi Germany dipstick. Frankly if a president wanted to, he damn well could disarm the public now. He has the military under his control as Commander-in-Chief. And all the conservative dumbasses were pissing and moaning that Obama was...
  2. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Really. So James Holmes and Cho Seung-hui were honest gun owners. Got it. Just say it, you don't give a rat's butthole how many people die just so you can keep stockpiling guns and ammo like some 21st Century Rambo wannabe. Let me put this for you in larger text. I suspect your eyes are not...
  3. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Statist, that's a new one. Should really add it to my siggy. Show me where the hell I called for banning guns? You can't. Know why? I never once called for such a ban. Why would I call for a ban on something I have considered purchasing? You sound like a real Dutch Boy fan. And yes...
  4. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Do you rant this hard against having to get a driver's license?
  5. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    I have no qualms with a Swiss style situation here in the United States, where people are in the reserves and can keep an automatic weapon in their house with a small amount of ammunition, and once their militia service is done, they either can surrender the weapon back to the government, or pay...
  6. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Don't tell me what I comprehend and what I don't. There is little regulation of any militia nowadays since there is little militia nowadays, and from high school English, both versions contain dependent clauses, and thus the right of the people to keep and bear arms is contingent upon that...
  7. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Make up your damn mind. Either booze causes or doesn't cause it. You can't have it both ways.
  8. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Really? How the hell did James Holmes and Cho Seung-hui get guns then? BOTH had extensive mental health histories. Oh. The old Alcohol counter-argument, how original and unique. That's never happened before ever. Yet again, it doesn't work nearly as well as you think. If alcohol causes...
  9. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    Firstly, I never once defined militia. But since you’ve swayed me to outline what I think we should have for a modern Militia, I will. My idea would be that all able-bodied gun-owners would be a part of the modern militia to be deployed in the event of domestic unrest or disaster. They would...
  10. P

    Senate Republicans vote down legislation that would block suspected terrorists...

    This may come as an absolute shock to you, the NRA, and all the ammosexuals in this country, but the Second Amendment does not say the People have the unrestricted right to own any gun they see fit. Rather, for those of us who have actually read the Constitution, it specifically and...
  11. P

    Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene

    Re: Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kha Sure, and dictatorships NEVER EVER lie when it comes to trying to pad the legitimacy of their regime and how popular they are with their public. Just like how the Kims in North Korea manage to be reelected...
  12. P

    Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene

    Re: Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kha *facepalm* Listen up, a country that has weapons of mass destruction in its arsenal is going to protect those weapons at ALL COSTS. Either he used them, or he didn't have the common decency to warn the UN...
  13. P

    Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene

    Re: Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kha Wow your grasp of the conflict is as tenuous as the OP. The US isn't supporting the AQ/MB factions, but other, more moderate factions, who, it's worth noting, only took up arms when military force was used...
  14. P

    Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene

    Re: Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kha The "vermin" would be those that were committing numerous crimes by using chemical weapons against his own people. Ergo: the same scumbag pieces of trash Iran and Russia are propping up. I, and I figure...
  15. P

    Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene

    Re: Russian President Vladimir Putin Met With Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kha Hmm, how does one protect a people from rampant human rights abuses by a regime? Could it possibly be: getting rid of the damn regime? Survey SAYS! Regime Change! *ding ding ding* Screw the UNSC, just...
See more
Back
Top Bottom