• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Onesliceshort

  1. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Re: The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426] Sunzi dropped that "witness" on to the thread. Ask him.
  2. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    A reminder for Tristan and Jaydeehess:
  3. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Re: The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426] You guys seem intent on ignoring posts and setting even higher demands. That witnesses must have "flight time" to identify aircraft, or that witnesses must draw the exact same flightpath no matter what their view and deny what those people...
  4. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Tristan says "Their own words"?? Morin says the aircraft was unambiguously over his head, over the Annex, between the Annex and the fence that runs along Columbia Pike, "no frickin way" was it south of Columbia Pike, and you say that he's wrong! The section of the flightpath, when the...
  5. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Don't want to talk about witnesses any more Jaydeehess? :mrgreen: Please provide the "SOC witnesses" that should fall within this "wide range of flight paths". Please provide the images of "passengers still in their seats". Please provide documentation that identified the images of scrap as...
  6. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Tristan, did Middleton see the aircraft over the ANC carpark?
  7. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Read the post again. He claims that the last thing he saw was the aircraft "lift up" as it reached those signs. Then the fireball. There's no in between. There's a stage of him deducing what happened after it reached those signs. Can the aircraft strike the building from the trajectory he and...
  8. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Go watch his interview again and take a screencap of the area where he claimed to have seen the descent. And that's rich coming from you when you read the horsecrap used here by you and jaydeehess to explain away all witnesses, Tristan. Middleton claimed that the aircraft arrived from between...
  9. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Tristan says: If the aircraft's shadow can deduce the position above the ground, Paik saying that the aircraft was heading towards the Annex and Morin claiming it went over his head, I don't see how there is a contradiction. As for Zakhem, from a previous post (I've excluded Ryan from the...
  10. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Second point: AWSmith of JREF and a host of members were drooling over this shadow. JREF Forum - View Single Post The altitude for the northern aircraft is based on witness statements (Paik, Morin and Zakhem) and the necessary altitude for the aircraft to cast a shadow on Paik's shop.
  11. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Sinki Paik is on record as seeing a shadow pass through his shop. End of story. Two points. First a direct quote from the creator of the animation: Contd...
  12. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Jaydeehess says Jesus man, I've posted the image of his POV a few times now. For the last time And we've had this discussion before. Middleton's view of the approach was limited, just as his view of the alleged impact area was limited, but his placement of the aircraft around the ANC...
  13. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Jaydeehess says: As the aircraft passed his shop, no, he couldn't physically see the Annex. But he put it on a trajectory towards the Navy Annex. He claimed that he could only see the right wing when he would have been able to see the entire aircraft on the directional damage path. Again, Paik...
  14. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Jaydeehess says: What's with all of the variations on the word "lying"?? Anyway... No, I'm saying that he couldn't physically see anything beyond the Citgo area. Why he claims that he saw right up to the alleged impact, I don't know. Remember that he was writing an essay to try and clarify...
  15. Onesliceshort

    The Pentagon - National Security Alert [W:1426:1484]

    Jaydeehess says: He claimed that the aircraft was at "third floor level" and that if it had been at first floor level, it would have "taken a lot more out". He was actually quite defensive about it. And I'm not saying he's lying about anything. What information do you think he could...
See more
Back
Top Bottom