• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Objective Voice

  1. O

    Slavery Days or 2021?

    After looking at these men under magnification, I'm pretty sure both men on horse back, as well as the other uniformed guy on foot, are all White. It looks like they are either Texas Rangers or the Mexican version of the Border Patrol.
  2. O

    Bette Midler calls on women to refuse sex to protest Texas abortion law

    🤦‍♂️ You can't withhold sex from rapists.
  3. O

    Now we know the real reason many southerners aren't worried about Covid.

    When we tell our loved ones "be safe out there", does that mean they shouldn't pay attention to things that are happening around them and that this bubble of protection will shield them from all danger? No, of course not. It means they should be alert to the hazards around them and take...
  4. O

    [W:32]Allen Weisselberg’s Lawyer Tells Judge There’s ‘Strong Reason to Believe’ More Indictments ‘Could Be’ Coming in Trump Organization Case

    I don't want to hear anything from the SDNY unless it's a warrant for tfg's arrest ahead of October 2022.
  5. O

    Democrats cannot grant legal status to millions of immigrants as part of budget bill, Senate parliamentarian rules

    I think that's a large part of the Democrat Party's problem...that and ethics. The party wants so much to be seen as the party that plays above board; the party that in a post-Trump era has moral and ethical standards. It wants to be seen as the party that doesn't skirt the rules. It's why...
  6. O

    Biden is a communist traitor dictator and needs to be impeached.

    🤦‍♂️... Let's tackle this foolishness in reverse, shall we? The Geneva Convention only applies to war crimes. I know Trump considered fighting covid-19 as if he were "fighting a war", but theatrics aside...no. Covid-19 is not a POW and mandating the wearing of facial masks or that citizens...
  7. O

    Sweeping new vaccine mandates for 100 million Americans

    I don't disagree. I'm just saying that particular Supreme Court case doesn't provide the precedent for doing either.
  8. O

    Texas social media censorship bill signed into law

    No, sir. It's really not about the users to any large, national social media platform. It's really about these social media platforms themselves. It's why Sect. 120.002(b) reads: If this was just about social media users in Texas, why would the law specifically state "social media...
  9. O

    Texas social media censorship bill signed into law

    This Texas Social Media Censorship law (HB-20) is trying to have it both ways. The law claims to only apply to social media "users" (i.e., residents, businesses) within the state of TX (Sect 120.002(a)) but then goes on to say the law "applies only to a social media platform that functionally...
  10. O

    Sweeping new vaccine mandates for 100 million Americans

    If there is a legal precedent for a vaccine mandate at the federal, it is not contained in Jacobson v Massachusetts. The Supreme Court's ruling in that cast was confined to only what the state's could mandate for a public health emergency, not what the federal government could mandate for same...
  11. O

    Sweeping new vaccine mandates for 100 million Americans

    Agreed. Jacobson v Massachusetts set the precedent for state's to mandate vaccinations, not the federal government. However, I would think in a national health emergency situation the General Welfare clause of the Constitution would provide sufficient just cause at the federal level. Any legal...
  12. O

    Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court is not 'a bunch of partisan hacks'

    "Judicial philosophies are not the same as political parties." - Justice Amy Coney Barrett Aren't they though? Judicial "philosophies" is essentially is how one's ideals figure into application of the law. Put another way, it's your interpretation of what a law means and how it should be...
  13. O

    Texas passes law banning abortion after 6 weeks...

    You bought into the smoke screen, buddy.
  14. O

    Texas passes law banning abortion after 6 weeks...

    However way you wish to describe the 5 Republican SC justices, Roe v Wade won't be overturned. If you pay very close attention to what's been done in red states with abortion laws they've passed each playing around the edges of the case, i.e., when life begins, where abortions can take place...
  15. O

    90 Retired Generals and Admirals Call for Austin and Milley to Resign Immediately Over the Disastrous Afghanistan Withdrawal

    Whether he does or not is irrelevant. But since you brought it up, I just hope this country is smart enough NOT to elect that orange asshole back into office. And while I'd like to say anyone on the Right is better than Trump, you have Sen. "Lying" Ted "Cancun" Cruz, Sen. "Never Ready to Sit...
Top Bottom