• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Mashmont

  1. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    I doubt Joe has ever asked for forgiveness. He's like you. He doesn't believe in that religion stuff.
  2. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    You missed it, Sky. For a minor to be convicted of a sexual crime, there had to have been 1) force 2) threat of violence or 3) incapacitation of the victim through drugs or other means. NONE of those conditions were present with Josh. You tried to argue forcible rape satisfies the “force”...
  3. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    Josh wasn’t a child molester, according to the law.
  4. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    Nothing wrong with noticing handsome women!
  5. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    Forcible fondling is a legal term. It doesn’t mean force was used. In fact someone can be asleep, as apparently was the case. https://definitions.uslegal.com/f/forcible-fondling/
  6. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    Jinger is a FOX! Or is it Jenna? The one married to Seewald.
  7. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    His sisters have forgiven Josh. God has forgiven Josh. I’ve forgiven Josh. Now if only the leftwingers and atheists can forgive Josh!
  8. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    You don’t think it’s good these girls were untraumatized? The law differentiates levels of offense. What Josh did wouldn’t have gotten him as a minor convicted.
  9. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    The law actually says force or threat of violence. No indication of either
  10. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    They seem untraumatized. That’s a good thing
  11. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    Finally, a rational post!
  12. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    OK? No. Traumatic? No.
  13. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    Wrong, but not criminal. And not a sex offense as determined by the federal government
  14. M

    [W: 1667] JOSH DUGGARARRESTED IN ARKANSASBy Federal Agents

    And there you have it. You just explained why Josh’s acts as a 14-year-old wouldn’t have gotten him either a conviction or an assignment to the National Sex Offenders Registry. They were non-violent. They didn’t involve coercion, and they didn’t involve drugs. The federal government wouldn’t...
Back
Top Bottom