• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by jaeger19

  1. J

    Brain-dead woman must carry fetus to birth because of abortion ban, family says

    There you go. When do we start prosecuting women for taking birth control? Why not it’s all living human tissue with living dna.? Please explain. Explain the difference in the above. No I don’t don’t ascribe a whole value of life to people. Thats your schtick which you of course can’t define...
  2. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    Sorry but since you can’t predict the future you can’t know that treatment won’t work . Have a nice day.
  3. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    Of course I do But you said that don’t exist . You forgot that didn’t you. No any researcher can tell you that the number of people who transition is exceedingly small. And then getting a group that literally faces possible death if exposed to talk to a researcher about their experiences is...
  4. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    Not false . Since suicide in people with gender dysphoria is high While dissatisfaction with what you call “ mutilating bodies etc, is low. Then you can’t claim that children with gender dysphoria won’t benefit from treatment. That’s your logic.
  5. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    No it was in the Supreme Court case. First I am a conservative and second that’s a bald faced lie. Thats just right wing propoganda . I defy you to find that these books have become standard reading material in schools. No. No one is demanding that books “ like Kennedy read” be in schools...
  6. J

    How to ban guns without firing a single shot!

    I am sorry but according to you we cannot objectively measure any threat to children. Why do you keep avoiding admitting that YES prevalence can be measured and that data Shows that when prevalence went up, gun violence went down? When you start acknowledging the facts here then we can move to...
  7. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    Yeah you’d rather see them kill themselves to make yourself feel better. “The associations with the highest [adjusted odds ratio] were with decreased suicidality, which is important given the mental health disparities experienced by this population, particularly the high levels of self-harm and...
  8. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    That study shows that long term decades later they don’t have issues And the previous study I cited was an adosecents that received gender affirming care such as HRT Compared to those that didn’t receive it as adolescents and the study found that the group that received HRT as adolescents were...
  9. J

    How to ban guns without firing a single shot!

    Synonym my friend. Can’t get around it. : one of two or more words or expressions of the same language that have the same or nearly the same meaning According to your premise we can’t objectively measure the risk/ threat to children.
  10. J

    How to ban guns without firing a single shot!

    Um no. You just said that you cannot objectively measure a threat . I. E. Risk And before you stick your foot in your mouth again. Synonyms for risk: THREAT. https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/risk
  11. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    I see. So no teaching of science like biology or scientific method , Gosh kids might question that whole bible thing with Noah’s ark No teach astronomy and how the planets move cuz we don’t want the kids to learn the earth isn’t flat and the sun doesn’t revolve around the earth. No teaching...
  12. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    Actually I just provided scientific evidence that showed long term support for those procedures . If you’d like more education on the subject here is another one “Gender-affirming surgery is a durable treatment that improves overall patient well-being. High patient satisfaction, improved...
  13. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    Ummm because the example I gave was banned from a public school school. Feel free to explain why it should be banned. Please show that the book Kennedy read was a staple in elementary classrooms across the country . I’ll wait. Perhaps while I wait I’ll read a book that has incest rape...
  14. J

    Supreme Court backs parents seeking to opt their kids out of LGBTQ books in elementary schools

    No it means that instead of focusing on actual education. ( Which by the way would include teaching about the history and philosophy of actual Marxism ,capitalism etc. ) Education is being bullied into only what religious righties find acceptable. It’s the antithesis of education .
Back
Top Bottom