• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by gerrycan

  1. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    That's the NIST model that's blue you clown. :lamo I don't know Mark, not my buddy, and nothing to do with this thread, so maybe better if you just stfu about that and stick to what you are good at, which is humping Mick West's leg. So do you agree with Mick re this FEA study, or do you agree...
  2. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    I noticed the source of the video yes. It's PIXELS. It would take a particular kind of moron to believe that represented FEA data. I haven't seen the data yet for Alaska but it will be released. What can you tell from your pixel video - tell me why WTC7 is all shimmering blue when it should be...
  3. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Mike, it's in the report. Mick just made at least 7 howlers of errors that a 12 year old kid could have picked up on. Of course there's a dynamic analysis, just not the one mick is looking at. Dynamic Vs linear just means a curved graph Vs a straight line for material properties. And that video...
  4. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Mike YouTube
  5. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Alaska recreates the collapse a lot closer than NIST. No inputs from NIST, all inputs coming from Alaska. You trust the science that you can quantify and test. Recreate. If you can't do that with it, it's not science. NIST is not science. No data. your friend Mick has really shown himself up...
  6. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Here's a tweet or two from Mick West, owner of metabunk, and Mike's favourite tech guy...... He is discussing just how outraged he is that these know nothing professors and PHDs have had the audacity to use a "static linear analysis". Mick states how ridiculous this is and dismisses the...
  7. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    How's your very technical friend Mr West, who's expertise you directed people toward for guidance on this specific topic, doing ? You should maybe go and check he's feeling okay just now. I think he could do with a bit cheering up maybe. Ask him how his public attack on the study is going for...
  8. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    It might be worth googling the first name there as an example to see who she worked for while you can still edit this. Therese P. McAllister
  9. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Luckily, you're free to go and test any one of those alternate scenarios that you like. If you ever find one where fire brings it down, you can present your analysis, with your model and input data. Until then, the best you have is NIST, with no way of checking their model or input data. Maybe...
  10. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Yes. He used different analysis. That's the 2 models that I am talking about. A linear one and a dynamic one. I think you may be confusing the types of analysis with the 2 different programs that they used ? (ABAQUS and SAP2000) They do both use assumptions yes, that's a fair comment. Alaska...
  11. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Yeah. For calling Mick a, what's the word, starts with a "C". And even that overestimated his usefullness. That Mick West tried to debate me on the very issue of these omitted elements and the expansion of the beam almost exactly 6 years ago to the day that this report was released, and lost...
  12. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    Sure it is - In one post.... Mick looks at 2 different models, a static linear analysis and a dynamic analysis, and declares "These look like different models". Duh. (he realises they're different types of analysis entirely later) He describes the goal of solving a static linear analysis as if...
  13. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

    I see Mike has posted the pdf up above there. Thanks Mike.
  14. G

    WTC 7 Collapse - UAF - Draft Report Presentation

  15. G

    The Soon-to-Be-Released Building 7 Study: Structural Engineers Weigh In

    Host Andy Steele is joined by AE911Truth board members Kamal Obeid and Casey Pfeiffer, both of whom are structural engineers, to discuss the upcoming release of the World Trade Center Building 7 Study draft report by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks — and the impact they expect...
See more
Back
Top Bottom