-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
gboisjo's latest activity
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.I think its safe to say ASHES gives the ARCCA witnesses 5 gold stars, me not so much. In one of Read's TV clips she talks about pulling... -
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.There won't be a thread, I thought I would just slip it in as a way to say adios to the child murderer. Its all I have to say about her...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.https://idahonews.com/news/local/lori-vallow-daybell-found-guilty-in-third-and-final-trial-of-conspiracy-to-commit-murder-chad-daybell-do...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.I will give credit where credit is due. ASHES trial threads provide an opportunity for forum members to not only follow but to involve...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.Breaking news, Lori Daybell just found guilty in her third trial for conspiring to commit murder. Thankfully this should be the end of...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.3rd party culprits, how can the defense argue 3rd party culprits when they didn't even call Colin Albert or Brian Higgins. DUH! Denied.
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.We shouldn't under estimate the weight jurors give to the likability of all the lawyers in the case. Cases are won and lost based on not...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.I agree, he's the reason why there was no conviction in the first trial. The man is simply boring, no bump in his step.
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.Rentscheler's powerpoint excluded from jurors eyes. Early on today defense is losing a bunch of arguments by the judge
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.Two things that will put the prosecution over the top are the small pieces of tail light found in O'Keefes shirt and Read's own words...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.Having had time to think about Brennan's decision not to rebut probably had something to do with jury fatigue. The jury is off today...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.More bullshit, it was tactical mistake. He could have come up with a million things, he didn't. Its your bias showing your ass again.
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.In Jackson's world Read is the victim, forget O'Keefe, he matters only as it relates to his case. I would give my left nut to see him...
-
gboisjo replied to the thread Karen Read Trial - Take 2.Not taking advantage of the opportunity to rebut by Brennan was a mistake IMO. Its was golden ticket to get the last word in. I couldn't...