• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by element94

  1. element94

    Senator McConnell Blames Tucker Carlson for Demonization of Ukraine

    I would add 'Disgraced Trump Dog' to the beginning of the thread title.
  2. element94

    Queers for Palestine?

    Get back to me next year.
  3. element94

    Agent Removed From Harris’s Detail After ‘Distressing’ Behavior

    That's exactly what one of the alternate links indicated.
  4. element94

    Elon Musk retweets Tucker Carlson white grievance interview

    Nah, not even close: Olin D. Johnston (the D stands for DeWitt!), Governor, U.S. Senator South Carolina - "I don’t run from n******, but I run them from me."
  5. element94

    So the 5 criminally inclined SCOTUSJs are saying it's ok for a President to engage in, plan and direct criminal acts so long as he is doing it with

    Well, they already did their job: delaying the other trials so there is no more serious case verdict before the election. I'd love to hope for Nuremberg style trials of all these nefarious traitors on the right in the near future, and complete in every way like the originals.
  6. element94

    Ha ve the conservatives on SCOTUS shown their true colors today?

    Can't charge without evidence, and the wrong-wing house idiots with theah suthun akseeunts don't betray their lack of it, and their low brain power.
  7. element94

    Senator McConnell Blames Tucker Carlson for Demonization of Ukraine

    I'm talking about four years ago, you know, when he was minority leader and the second impeachment trial was going on. How many more times do I have to explain this to you?
  8. element94

    WSJ Editorial Board on today's SCOTUS immunity case

    Whatever the outcome of this is, it's already clear that the Supreme Court of the United States has inserted itself into this ridiculous notion, and thereby made sure that justice would not be served before the 2024 election in pending cases against the defendant! The once loved and respected...
  9. element94

    YES, FDR COULD have been prosecuted

    And despite Nixon avoiding impeachment and conviction, it was well known he would have faced prosecution if he hadn't been pardoned.
  10. element94

    Trump attorney: President can have military stage a coup - as long as Congress does not impeach and convict him

    Leave it to the Trump cult sycophants to hope for a way around a criminal based Constitutional violation. These people are sick in mind, body and soul, oh, and not "Christian" in the least, so lets put that to rest. :rolleyes:
  11. element94

    YES, FDR COULD have been prosecuted

    The rot is in the con party. We see the stinking corpse they support for president everyday now in a courtroom!
  12. element94

    Trump meeting NYC Union Construction Workers NOW

    Sorry I missed it but I do feel all warm and cuddly.
  13. element94

    YES, FDR COULD have been prosecuted

    Full immunity, total immunity and full and total criminality!
  14. element94

    YES, FDR COULD have been prosecuted

    The process of an impeachment trial has been broken by the GQP. It is no longer viable under current conditions. When you have a violation of the U.S. Constitution that the right-wing party is all for due to corruption, fear and cowardice, the process should be declared defunct. The proper thing...
Back
Top Bottom