• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Buzz

  1. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    This post is a perfect example of denialist BS, and why I don't debate here as much as I used to. Everything I say around here is backed up by the vast majority of climate science, while the crap Lord of Planar and longview push are mostly lies, misinformation, cherry-picked quotes and data, and...
  2. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    Rightly pointing out that long never said anything about satellite measurements is not weaseling out of anything. Whoever said anything about outgoing reflected shortwave radiation in this debate? Certainly not longview or me. And even if he had, it would be stupid to think that there would be...
  3. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    GHGs do increase downward longwave radiation. The data proving this has been shown to you many times. Damn, long... why do you keep repeating this BS? The warming from GHGs have feedbacks that are increasing the energy measured at the surface. Like increasing amounts of melting snow and ice...
  4. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    Longview said nothing about satellite measurements. Now, how about you explain something... If the surface recorded increase in absorbed solar radiation(ASR) came from the clearing of the atmosphere, whether it was a decrease in pollution or fewer clouds, then what would increase solar radiation...
  5. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    So... now you're saying that the increase in GHGs can cause an increase in solar radiation reaching the ground? :ROFLMAO: You really are losing your mind. Yep... you are unconcerned if a study contains outright lies, as long as it confirms your denialist beliefs. No surprise there.
  6. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    You don't know what you are talking about. The measurements came from surface sensors. Go read the study longview cited.
  7. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    Of course not! Are you forgetting where that 6.6 W m-2 increase came from? It was caused by the reduction of aerosols in the atmosphere. It certainly didn't happen because the sun became that much brighter. What the **** are you talking about? You're not making any sense. The authors of your...
  8. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    There you go again. Comparing a top-of-the-atmosphere calculation with surface measurements. This is nothing but scientific malpractice and does nothing but misinform people who don't know better. You should be ashamed of yourself, but I know you have no shame.
  9. Buzz

    Evidence that the climate scam is collapsing

    Nice! Another extreme outlier of a study authored by three engineers(no actual climate scientists) and published in a predatory journal. And when I start reading it, I quickly find an outright lie! Now I am familiar with the denialist works of Herrman Harde, but not the work of Wijngaarden and...
  10. Buzz

    DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

    Of course I do. But that isn't what I have been saying. According to NOAA, the 3-4mm is the uncertainty(or the error range) of the satellite measurements of global sea level. Yes, for one measurement. But when you combine numerous measurements and average them, the accuracy is increased. This...
  11. Buzz

    DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

    Your quote said no such thing. Oh... and here is the quote from your 32-year-old paper you just cited that George mentioned: I'll bet that if we found something similar that is more recent, it would verify the 3-4 mm that NOAA stated.
  12. Buzz

    DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

    Quote where they state that predicted tides are being used to determine sea level rise.
  13. Buzz

    DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

    Umm... Yes, you can. :LOL: Do you not know this? Or are you just lying again? I first linked to that NOAA page over 7 years ago. If it were incorrect, I am sure someone would have complained, and it would have been corrected by now. So what? The point is that the tides are removed using...
  14. Buzz

    DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

    And for everyone's information... Most studies of black carbon on snow and ice and its effect on melting (including many that Lord of Planar has ever cited) all say the same thing. And that is that the melting of snow and ice due to BC is second only to the melting caused by greenhouse gases.
  15. Buzz

    DOE: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate

    For everyone's information... THIS IS JUST MORE DENIALIST BS!! While a single reading of these satellites has an accuracy of about 3cm, thousands of readings over several days yield a much better accuracy of 3-4mm. https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/socd/lsa/SeaLevelRise/ And the satellites...
See more
Back
Top Bottom