• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by aociswundumho

  1. aociswundumho

    Should hereditarians and race realists be allowed to express their opinions?

    So all "race realists" are white supremacists? That doesn't seem right.
  2. aociswundumho

    Canada going so bonkers with gun control that they want to ban replica BB guns

    That's because you're not going to tell them what they want to hear.
  3. aociswundumho

    3% wealth tax on billionaires

    It's fine with me if you abolish them too.
  4. aociswundumho

    House COVID relief package supercharges ACA premium support

    Sure, but if healthcare is dirt cheap then you can easily set up a means-tested voucher system to provide the poor with medical services, and everyone's happy. True, but just because something hasn't existed doesn't necessarily mean it can't exist. Yes, but you did make the same argument...
  5. aociswundumho

    3% wealth tax on billionaires

    Easy, abolish the federal government.
  6. aociswundumho

    3% wealth tax on billionaires

    Good point. For income a rate of 1% for the first $40,000 and then a progressive scale to whatever income you like up to a max rate of 10%. The capital gains rate would be equal to the rate the taxpayer pays for income. Problem solved.
  7. aociswundumho

    3% wealth tax on billionaires

    Me as well. Both capital gains and income should be equally taxed at 10%.
  8. aociswundumho

    3% wealth tax on billionaires

    We have property taxes at the local and state level, not federal, and because they are at the state level, you can escape them, as I intend to in the near future.
  9. aociswundumho

    3% wealth tax on billionaires

    Nonsense. If that were true, people would fund the state voluntarily, and you wouldn't need the threat of a long prison sentence to get them to pay up. What people "like" is living at the expense of other people, and the state facilitates that for its own benefit.
  10. aociswundumho

    House COVID relief package supercharges ACA premium support

    No, via competition and the profit motive. Food is more important than healthcare. 100 years ago communists like yourself argued that without state control over the food supply, only the rich will eat. Agreed, probably much, much less than a quarter.
  11. aociswundumho

    Gun Grabbers make another play.

    Ladder control is not a hot political issue with each side having many organized, dedicated groups fighting against each other. Furthermore, a person who gets injured using a ladder did it to himself. With guns, it's often one person using the product to kill another person, which I think most...
  12. aociswundumho

    What future amendments do you want?

    My problem with it is it provides over half of all federal revenue.
  13. aociswundumho

    House COVID relief package supercharges ACA premium support

    No, it would make tremendous sense, as the price for healthcare in the US would drop through the floor. Ironically enough, the low prices would allow your commie system to actually work, in the same way food stamps work for food.
  14. aociswundumho

    What future amendments do you want?

    I'd like to see an amendment to repeal the 16th amendment.
  15. aociswundumho

    What future amendments do you want?

    They can't, because they think a person who makes the choice to kill himself is not mentally sound. If he were, he wouldn't choose to kill himself.
See more
Top Bottom