• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by alienken

  1. A

    Views of Palin deteriorate as GOP looks ahead

    No no, she quoted CNN. You know the unbiased, bipartisan, just the facts mame kind of orginization. .......NOT!! After this election CNN has NO credibility.
  2. A

    Time to give GW Bush a musical sendoff

    His last term was a disaster. I say good ridence. (oh I need to change my tagline) These politicians seem like they are going out of there way to destroy the economy. I know more about economics then they do and I'm just a bugman that bearly graduated high school!
  3. A

    A New Political Party Is Needed

    The media squeezed out the third parties. None were allowed in any debates. Everyone understands that third parties just pull votes from one of the two major candidates. During this election cycle I wished for a better selection, more to choose from, but all of the choosing can be done in the...
  4. A

    Gay rights protesters disrupt Sunday service

    The ANGRY left strikes again!
  5. A

    Calif. gov.: 'We will maybe undo' Prop 8

    Mariage is between 1 man and 1 woman. Instead of trying to redefine this why don't we have another term that would give devoted gay couples the same priviledges as marriage. Like a civil union or something like it. It's the tampering with the "mariage" definition is what has everyone upset...
  6. A

    Do you support a civilian national security force?

    No I am strongly against the cnsf. Critics of the gun rights issues wrongly point out that the only people who have a right to bear arms are the ones in the militas. The Libs want to create the "Official militia" so they can justify taking our guns away. Why else would Obama need a national...
  7. A

    American Military Attack into Syria

    The Bush doctrine was a very good thing. It simply stated that if you harbor terrorist you are as much as an enemy of the U.S. as the terrorist are. There are too many Head of countries that claim to be our friends while funding, training, and protecting our enemies. Bush was always critized by...
  8. A

    Is Obama due the same treatment as Bush?

    Here we go again about Iraq. Bush didn't lie. If there was never any WMDs then it was a mistake in intelligence agencies of the Bush admin, the Clinton admin and the intellegence of 5 other countries. The "Bush lied" was always just a partisian attack. Bush didn't defend himself so he deserves...
  9. A

    "Moderates"

    No I think that's when people use the neocon label. I think it is conservative to be strong militarily but only attack in defense of the homeland and allys. Pat Bucanon has a conservative international view eventhough I think he is too much of an isolationist.
  10. A

    Barack Obama Elected President!

    I am already hopeing for change and he hasn't even started yet. I am looking forward to 2012
  11. A

    U.S. walls off Baghdad neighborhood

    Yeah, the wall in Israel drasticly reduced the number of suicide bombers. When was the last time you heard of one in Isreal? It's been a while, when it used to be in the news everyday. Rockets are hard to come by when your nothing more than a street thug out to kill someone.
  12. A

    U.S. walls off Baghdad neighborhood

    Yes, dividing Iraq into 3 groups is overly simplistic and a terrible idea. We will never make these three groups of people get along.All we can do is give Iraqi Gov. a chance to control the situation. The wall will work because the neighborhoods are already seperated in groups.
  13. A

    Pentagon Extends All Iraq Tours 3 Months

    Yes, your right about that.The men and women of our military are there for a purpose.Obviuosly they are not expendable but the President should not be afraid to use them when necessary for as long of duration as necessary...I was refering to the comment "everyone's children including the...
  14. A

    Pentagon Extends All Iraq Tours 3 Months

    No, even the military leaders will tell you how bad things go when they have drafted troops that don't want to be there. This country is so great and our military so huge that we can fight a two front war with volunters with no good reason to draft and civilians at home do not have to sacrifice...
  15. A

    Pentagon Extends All Iraq Tours 3 Months

    Of course AQ is attacking Americans in Iraq, IT'S A WAR ZONE! To the people who feel that Iraq is not part of the war on terror. WE HAVE BEEN FIGHTING AQ DIRECTLY IN IRAQ! The last bomb that was set off in the Gov. building in Bagdad recently was by AQ.
Back
Top Bottom