- Joined
- Feb 11, 2019
- Messages
- 3,138
- Reaction score
- 3,625
Within reason, yes they can. However, when doing so, they are still open to civil suits over violation of rights of free speech. They have been protected by the government from that by way of section 230 exemption. My only point is that if they censor one side's political views over the other side, they do not deserve that Section 230 protection.
So you do want to force them to compelled by the federal government to allow content they don't wish.
Wow. Wouldn't expect that from a supposed small government conservative.
Good luck.
True, I am sure there is no glee in librul-land over losing the ability to control the narrative at least on Twitter.
Not sure what librul-land implies but I am surprised you are not a liberal.
What's your beef with liberalism? Not a fan of free market economies or something?
No thanks.
You are confused. I am not asking the government to force Twitter to do anything.
Yes you are.
I am just against the government giving them protection over lawsuits when they are censoring one side over the other.
Then you should start your own social media company. Good luck with that too.
Not sure why that's so hard for libruls to understand. If Twitter were censoring left wing viewpoints in favor of right wing viewpoints, you would be screaming against that protection as well.
No I wouldn't. I could care less what Twitter allows. I could care less what Facebook allows. I could care less what parlor allows. I could care less what truth social allows.
More a matter of when. He should be fully in charge in about six months.
Good for him.
As long as he does not play the partisan censorship game, I will be okay with section 230 exemption.
Well you feel free to get all worried about what he allows to be posted. I will be enjoying life.
Lol. Sadly I am a steel reserve man. Best bang for your buck.Make mine a Coors Banquet.