- Joined
- Mar 31, 2020
- Messages
- 38,505
- Reaction score
- 30,543
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Jealous?How do you know, did they send you nudes?
Jealous?How do you know, did they send you nudes?
Even if it's a mistake, if you quote Nazis and agree with the quote, you're stuck.Oh it's possible, just not with this bunch.
I actually attended a little talk from an ex-neonazi some years ago, he was sincere. He got sucked into it and eventually it didn't add up and he began to question his shiny new beliefs, and eventually got off the wagon. For him, it was a carry all for his gripes and grievances.
For these bitches, it's a religion.
More curious than anything.Jealous?
We're at the locust stage around here.Are you trying to get plagues? Because this is how you get plagues.
We're at the locust stage around here.
'They’re just gross': Mormon crickets descend on Nevada and wreak havoc
"They look like spiders, and they poop everywhere," Precious Drake of Elko, told a local outlet.www.usatoday.com
Oh, just the usual noods result. Your eyes start bleeding and everyone around you starts chanting shit in Enochian. And the Nazi guy melts. You know the drill.More curious than anything.
Maybe a bit of jealousy?
Excellent.Oh, just the usual noods result. Your eyes start bleeding and everyone around you starts chanting shit in Enochian. And the Nazi guy melts. You know the drill.
God said keep the whores out of the cities, so we did. He agreed to keep the crickets out of the cities in return. God is fair minded. Doesn't even care that the crickets are Mormon.See? That's because you guys can't act right.
Excellent.
Edit: Wait, is THAT what they keep in the Ark of the Covenant?
God said keep the whores out of the cities, so we did
Seems like a lot of inconvenience to keep a cranky old god happy.At the ranch.
Exactly, in 1551 before it was edited to be politicly correct it read;Yeah that's basically saying you can't steal someone else's slave and sell them.
What the quote says is true. If you control the youth, you control the future.Context on a Quote from Hitler? Are you serious?
So Quoting Hitler but not giving him credit makes the quote ok in your book?What the quote says is true. If you control the youth, you control the future.
So yes, context would be great.
Did they attribute the quote or were they just using it to espouse some other belief?
If it is applicable, sure? It's just words. I think Hitler may have used the words love and me, and you, and I. Are those off limits as well, or only when the words are put together in a certain way?So Quoting Hitler but not giving him credit makes the quote ok in your book?
Sure.No using the words of Hitler to make a point is always wrong in normal society. The only ones who think it is ok are Nazis.
I learned alot about them in Scott Lively's "The Pink Swastika".You really have no clue what Nazis are do you?
Uhhhh....what part of receiving the death penalty for man stealing do you not understand?Are you joking? Sounds damn pro-slavery to me...
That's a law against kidnapping. The same book of the Bible explicitly lays out the rules for owning slaves in multiple passages.
The women during the Founding era were given an important job that liberals don't understand today:So the Founders who did not embrace women as equal citizens were not following Judeo Christian values when they founded the country?
Obviously reading comprehension isn't your strong point.Yeah that's basically saying you can't steal someone else's slave and sell them.
Obvously you'er not aware of the diffrent kinds of "slaves" that there are. The bible mostly talks about what we would call a "prisoner of war", and it talks about indentured servitude as well.
The women during the Founding era were given an important job that liberals don't understand today:
Raising a family. It hardly made them "unequal", it made them superior.
See this here shit is real easy - don't 'splain Hitler quotes.'He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future"
Who said it is less important that the truthfulness of it I suppose. Do we have the context?
If you would like to break down your sentence, piece by piece, showing chapter and verse, 'll gladly debate it with you. How about we start off with your first point?The Bible goes into detail about how slaves are your property, their children are slaves, you can buy them from other nations, and you can beat them as harshly as you want so long as it takes them more than a few days to die from it. It’s most definitely not just POWs and indentured servants.
The Bible goes into detail about how slaves are your property
Really? It was superior to have no protected rights or ability to vote?
What kind of slave are you talkng about? POW, indentured servitude, or one that was stolen?Slaves must have been really superior then.
If you would like to break down your sentence, piece by piece, showing chapter and verse, 'll gladly debate it with you. How about we start off with your first point?
Yes, a prisoner of war or someone that has made an agreement for indentured servitude, would be considered "your property" because they aren't free to leave and have to abide by your rules. Their children: The POW or the person who has agreed to indentured servitude are allowed to keep their children, and depending on thier age, as expected to work as well.
I look forward to hearing the rest of your claims, backed by biblical chapters and verses.
The idea of the importance of raising a family is in another universe for liberals, so I can't blame you for not understanding.
What kind of slave are you talkng about? POW, indentured servitude, or one that was stolen?
How about we talk about the latter? You are aware that fellow African tribes put their enemies up for sale aren't you? (if they didn't butcher and eat them first).