• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Zimmerman's lawyers: Cops will testify for us

spanky

Banned
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
5,431
Reaction score
979
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
George Zimmerman defense witnesses: Zimmerman's lawyers: Cops will testify for us - OrlandoSentinel.com

Interesting. Anyone want to offer some conjecture on this?
 
Serino's on the list. Hmmm...
 
I often pointed out in the past the unusual nature of this case of the police, even FBI, testifying for the Defense.
 
spanky said:
George Zimmerman defense witnesses: Zimmerman's lawyers: Cops will testify for us - OrlandoSentinel.com


Interesting. Anyone want to offer some conjecture on this?
Click to expand...

Too obvious.

It appears O'Mara's strategy is not to fight the charges per se, but to actually work toward a manslaughter charge. He knows he can not win, so he will make it seem like he is putting up a fight. When in reality, manslaughter will be a win for him.

"Sanford police investigated the case for several weeks without making an arrest. Lee and Serino said they were working to gather evidence for a manslaughter charge when they decided to hand the case over to State Attorney Norm Wolfinger."

Like the investigation reports by Serino said, Sanford PD was working on charging Zimmerman with manslaughter. Their investigation at the time clearly supported it.
 
Are the police actually testifying "for" someone?
Or are they just testifying?
 
Simon W. Moon said:
Are the police actually testifying "for" someone?
Or are they just testifying?
Click to expand...

Obviously they are just testifying, but if their testimony supports one side over another, which seems to be what omara believes, and as they are on the defense witness list, it can be said they are testifying for someone.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
Are the police actually testifying "for" someone?
Or are they just testifying?
Click to expand...

they will be called as witnesses on behalf of the defense
if they were not expected to offer testimony which would support zimmerman's case
i don't think the defense would have included them on its witness list

now to learn who is on the prosecution's witness list
 
ric27 said:
Clarify any chain of custody issues that might crop up
Click to expand...

why would it be any different with the police on the defense team witness list than it when the police are found on the prosecution's witness list?
 
justabubba said:
why would it be any different with the police on the defense team witness list than it when the police are found on the prosecution's witness list?
Click to expand...

Probably wouldn't be any difference....but sometimes **** happens and its best to be prepared

Some things seem to have been done by the book, but it wouldn't be the first time, the prosecution throws their own people under the bus

For instance, the firing of Chief Bill Lee

The detail into just exactly what went down
 

I believe your speculation is wrong. He could negotiate a manslaughter plea at any time he wanted to. You don't fight for and take risk for what you can get without the risk. I think virtually everyone but GZ-haters recognize this is a manslaughter case and M2 used to allow the jury to "compromise" on manslaughter rather just a yes-or-no verdict.
 

There's a chance Z can get off on self defense, if the jury believes it was TM who initiated the violence and that Z truly was in fear for himself, they could call it that way.

There's no reason for the def and Z to accept a Man plea deal at this point, but they might consider it if the trial is going badly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…