- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,906
- Reaction score
- 489
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If you study african history, you will notice a pattern among african nations. They were all decolonized by the end of the 60s but they went through the same phases at different times. The first phase is a relatively short lived (in some, it's skipped) democracy riddled with corruption. Then the military gets tired of the democracy so they take over the country in a usually bloodless coup. This phase lasts for decades. Eventually, the people are restless with the regime for several reasons involving corruption, sectarianism, or even a crisis. This leads to a civil war. Some countries become stable democracies once the regime is overthrown but most go through a period of instability.
Zimbabwe is in the 2nd phase and its "president", Robert Muggabe, is older than bernie sanders. When he does die, it will likely lead to a power vacuum which will lead to a surge in corruption which will make the people angry which will lead to a civil war. After the civil war is over, there will be president who promises to abide by a constitution and only do 2 terms but he'll try to ammend it and run a third. This will rile up the people again leading to violent protests which may lead to more instability
Zimbabwe is in the 2nd phase and its "president", Robert Muggabe, is older than bernie sanders. When he does die, it will likely lead to a power vacuum which will lead to a surge in corruption which will make the people angry which will lead to a civil war. After the civil war is over, there will be president who promises to abide by a constitution and only do 2 terms but he'll try to ammend it and run a third. This will rile up the people again leading to violent protests which may lead to more instability