LOL, and how do you know that nobody's only intention is to bash people of faith? Answer: You don't.
I can't imagine why others couldn't respond to me "freely" on this thread. But I do actually understand that (1) the purpose of this thread isn't mockery, (2) that if my beliefs "invite" mockery I should examine them and reconsider, (3) that examination of my conscience should be productive and yet require me to be "open-minded," (4) that whether I should speak my peace or be silent is a case-by-case situation, (5) that criticism of an idea isn't necessarily criticism of a person personally, (6) that criticism isn't necessarily mockery, and that, (7) your "you" is the "universal you" rather than me personally.
I'm guessing that you're assuming that I am breathtakingly stupid and unable to understand the points you've made above without "help." Trust, I get it. I'm actually able to distinguish between criticism and mockery.
And what I have to say here, and I'm repeating myself, is that as somebody who understands the distinction between "dialogue" and "open exchange of ideas" and "constructive criticism" is that it appears to me that sharing my opinions or beliefs, whatever they may happen to be, is an invitation to mockery.
If you'd like to reply and try to school me again, let's just begin with #1: My opinion is that expressing my beliefs or lack of them is just not worth it. I mean, really, if you sincerely believe that nobody's intention is solely to bash others who dare to hold a "religious opinion," then you need to work on your own naievete.
You're really wasting your time trying to defend the observable and indefensible reality. But okay, why don't you and I just watch in this forum how it goes and how many threads aren't derailed by attacks on faith and then moved to the philosophy forum?