- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 7,692
- Reaction score
- 3,368
- Location
- TN
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
No of course not, the far left feel betrayed by him. He's too centrist for them, and he's too left wing for Conservatives. He may have some of the Independents still but the extraneous actions and obvious misses in his first 3 1/2 years as well as the joke of "HOPE and CHANGE" have many independents wondering if they should just stay home and watch a movie on election night.
I think so... he promised everything to everyone. Frankly, I don't see how he wins given his record. He can't run away from it - I think that's why he's trying to run against Congress.Should the far left not feel betrayed by him? I'd agree with most of your post, though. He's stuck between a rock and a hard place.
I think so... he promised everything to everyone. Frankly, I don't see how he wins given his record. He can't run away from it - I think that's why he's trying to run against Congress.
I think so... he promised everything to everyone. Frankly, I don't see how he wins given his record. He can't run away from it - I think that's why he's trying to run against Congress.
Well, if there ever was another run against Congress now would be the time. I don't disagree with their strategy. If the tables were turned and a (R) were running they might do the same thing.Well Congress does have the lowest approval ratings in history... plus there's the fact they have turned into a bunch of hyper-partisans bent on not agreeing.
killed Bin Laden.
ended Iraq War.
passed meaningful healthcare reform.
passed meaningful financial reform.
put tobacco under FDA regulation.
signed good new nuclear weapons treaty with Russia.
passed new fuel-efficiency standards for cars AND trucks (first time).
stock market back above 12,000 points.
unemployment heading down.
Obama's record isn't perfect, but considering the mess he inherited, he's doing ok.
In 2007, Obama was adamant that the president did not have the power to authorize an attack if there was no imminent threat to the U.S. But now he has authorized just such an action. Full Flop.
During the presidential campaign, Obama defended his 96 percent record as a strong stand for his principles. But when Brown has the same rating in Masschusetts, he's not independent enough. That earns Obama a Full Flop.
Have you never heard of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Dwight David Eisenhower, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Lyndon Baines Johnson, Richard Milhouse Nixon, James Earl Carter, Ronald Wilson Reagan, or William Jefferson Clinton?
Not from any of the righties who insist on wielding the "Hussein" part like a cudgel.
It's a pathetically immature and racially based way of pointing out that Obama is somehow not a real American-- too liberal, maybe born in Kenya, a elitist, has the same last name as the Muslim Arabs over there in the Mideast...
It's pathetic. And hiding behind the "it's his middle name, what?" is wearing mighty thin.
I always find it amusing how Democrats can pummel Republicans with Obama's actual middle name.
I find it amusing that that's what you think is going one here.
It's like sixth graders making fun of a kid with the last name of Wiener. "What? It's you last name, WIENER."
More like, I find it amusing that the kid being called "Weiner" gets others to beat up kids who have no problem with his last name.
Reading your posts is like watching a 10 year old jump on a scarecrow and scream "LOOK MAMA! I GOT ME A STRAW MAN!"
Ahh... so you're confused again by what you call a 10 year old post. What part would you like me to rephrase so you can understand it? Analogies are difficult for you to understanding... I know.
Your entire post is a strawman - I'll explain why:
Radical moderate spoke of "any of the righties who insist on wielding the "Hussein" part like a cudgel."
You twisted it into it being Democrats attacking Republicans and then further distorted his actual argument to be about and I quote "kids who have no problem with his last name."
Ockham said:I always find it amusing how Democrats can pummel Republicans with Obama's actual middle name.
:lamo Is it that you don't have a sense of humor or you just thought you might try an push my buttons tonight? Either way... your little accusations are also very amusing. Is this the part where you claim I'm programmed by "Faux News" or maybe Rush Limbaugh... oh no wait wait... ahh... it's all part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!At no point does Radical Moderate address people who don't use his name to insult yet you, like the feigned outrage agent you are, twisted it to be about something he never even spoke about.
Really, I just thought they were female dogs... or aliens. One of the two.In essence he said "son of a bitch" and you cried foul at the thought that he could call all women bitches.
Oh, are you looking for a date? See sweetums, I don't walk on that side of the road but thanks for asking! I'm really flattered... no really. Flattered.:roflDo you get the point yet Ockham dear?
It's the name he used when he was innaugurated. Are you ashamed of his middle name?
I'll take this as valid when I see someone talk about George Herbert Walker Bush, or Richard Milhous Nixon.
You may be correct, but I really don't recall prior to FDR.
More like, I find it amusing that the kid being called "Weiner" gets others to beat up kids who have no problem with his last name.
Okay, bub. Keep playing dumb. You know perfectly well why people like ronpaulvoter purposefully type out Obama's full name. Almost no other President needs their middle name mentioned, but all of a sudden, people are mixing up their Barack Obamas. Get real.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?