RightConservative
New member
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 0
If you are a person in your late forties or older, you know (or should know) that the Democrat Party you once knew no longer exists. The Democrat Party of years ago is gone and does not appear likely to return.
Who are the troubling mischief makers these days?
The bulk of today's Democrat leaders, who subscribe to a political ideology and act and obstruct in ways that undermine America and undo much of what is good about America. The radical far left secular extremists have used America's judiciary, both federal and state, to implement a "social" agenda that could not win the approval of either the voters in referenda or the voters' elected representatives in the legislative and executive branches of government. And the Senate Democrats have tried mightily (albeit unconstitutionally) to block President Bush's voter-authorized effort to appoint strict constructionists to the federal courts by denying up-or-down votes contemplated by the Constitution. Under the Constitution, a simple majority suffices for approval of a President's nominee. But a willful Democrat minority blocked a number of President Bush's federal appellate court nominees during his first term and tried to continue to do so during his second term. Only a well founded fear that Republicans, whose Senate majority had been increased as a result of the 2004 elections, would exercise the constitutional option (which Democrats refer to as the nuclear option, in an effort to strike terror in people's hearts) ended the obstruction.
Read the rest
--------------
Did anyone NOT know this would happen?
Who are the troubling mischief makers these days?
The bulk of today's Democrat leaders, who subscribe to a political ideology and act and obstruct in ways that undermine America and undo much of what is good about America. The radical far left secular extremists have used America's judiciary, both federal and state, to implement a "social" agenda that could not win the approval of either the voters in referenda or the voters' elected representatives in the legislative and executive branches of government. And the Senate Democrats have tried mightily (albeit unconstitutionally) to block President Bush's voter-authorized effort to appoint strict constructionists to the federal courts by denying up-or-down votes contemplated by the Constitution. Under the Constitution, a simple majority suffices for approval of a President's nominee. But a willful Democrat minority blocked a number of President Bush's federal appellate court nominees during his first term and tried to continue to do so during his second term. Only a well founded fear that Republicans, whose Senate majority had been increased as a result of the 2004 elections, would exercise the constitutional option (which Democrats refer to as the nuclear option, in an effort to strike terror in people's hearts) ended the obstruction.
Read the rest
--------------
Did anyone NOT know this would happen?