Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 121,381
- Reaction score
- 32,400
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
More pouting about me.
More undirected childish talk.
More pouting about me.
What’s really childish is continuing to follow me around from thread to thread whining
Same ole whining about me
Same ole Fledermaus inability to educate himself.
Hardly surprising.
But still pathetic.
?? Ooooookaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyy. What is this in reference to? Who in South Korea commits mass murder?and happily defends mass murdering tyrants like the ones who run South Korea
?? Ooooookaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyy. What is this in reference to? Who in South Korea commits mass murder?
I asked who in South Korea commits mass murder. That would be in reference to current leaders. I don't care about pre 1990 dictators in a country that is fully reformed and no longer acts that way.Well gee, the first leader of the country, for starters. And just about every leader right up until the late 1980s. You DO know South Korea was a brutal dictatorship for the first thirty plus years of its existence.....right?
I asked who in South Korea commits mass murder. That would be in reference to current leaders. I don't care about pre 1990 dictators in a country that is fully reformed and no longer acts that way.
I don't know about that. If he did then shame on him. Fledermaus, did you ever support murderous dictators in South Korea?And I pointed out the fact that Fledermaus defends the tyrants who did so.
I don't know about that. If he did then shame on him. Fledermaus, did you ever support murderous dictators in South Korea?
Where he wails “but North Korea” in response to my pointing out what the South Korean tyrants did.
Where he tries to defend the dictatorship by crying “but the economy!”
Where, when confronted by the fact South Korea was a brutal dictatorship, he blubbered on again about supposed “prosperity” as if that was somehow an excuse.
Where he engages in whataboutism en masse to try and defend multiple dictatorships.
Where he excuses the overthrow of democracy and establishment of military dictatorships by crying about “communism” and “people not wanting another North Korea”.
What I see is something like this:
Him: North Korea is a brutal dictatorship!
You: So what? South Korea used to be a brutal dictatorship but you don't care!
Him: So what? NK was and IS far worse than SK was and SK is no longer that way!
You: You are an apologist for past SK dictators!
My question is this: Why is he an apologist for past SK dictators but you are not an apologist for current (and far worse) NK dictators??
Then your reading comprehension isn’t very good. You managed to get it completely backwards
I pointed out the fact that South Korea was a brutal dictatorship, and he responded by trying to defend the tyrants by whining “but Norht Korea” and “but the economy”.
And no, actually, South Korea’s dictatorships were every bit as bad as the North.
Which makes your “question” crash and burn.
So you say but I call BS. What's your evidence for this? And what happened in SK that now makes it a liberal democracy?And no, actually, South Korea’s dictatorships were every bit as bad as the North.
Way to prove me right.....again
A dictatorship collapsing “peacefully” doesn’t make it not brutal bud
So you say but I call BS. What's your evidence for this? And what happened in SK that now makes it a liberal democracy?
And Fledermaus proves me right yet again by engaging in the whataboutism he shrieks about to try and defend South Korea’s vicious tyrants.
Post Korean War right up until the South Korean people overthrew their tyrants both were vicious dictatorships, so I vote neither.